This can be actually good, a sign of powerful energy release. Not very
probable- I understand it was a reactor with fuel (?)
If other 2 cases happen: active cells explode, dummy cells not- we cant
start to be happy- but with doubts.
Let's see the details
Peter
Peter
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at
FYI:
The explosion occurs at approximately the 3:00:43 mark of the 4:00:04 video.
Mark Jurich
-Original Message-
From: Craig Haynie
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dog Bone Project
They just ran a test with a live rossi core, and
That is probably the targeting laser spot for the Williamson pyrometer.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:17 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
After the explosion there is a small white spot that persists after
most of the tube ceases to glow white.
Is that lens flare or a residual hot spot in
After the explosion there is a small white spot that persists after
most of the tube ceases to glow white.
Is that lens flare or a residual hot spot in the reactor?
Harry
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:58 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Do you believe the sensor, or your eyes?
-mi
Be careful not to get the integrity too strong, otherwise you could have a
real pipe bomb on your hands..
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ryan Hunt reports that the failure mode was NOT the compression fitting
giving way under pressure - the fitting
There must be a some sort of reaction component to this explosion because
the gamma counter when wild for a few seconds. Gammas are produced by
nuclear causes.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
Ryan confirmed that the tube used was of the original
It is premature to assume that the explosion was caused by the Rossi effect.
The temperature was rising smoothly a few seconds before it occurred, but there
seemed to be some indication of a very rapid rise immediately before everything
went haywire.
According to my simulations this might be
Bob Greenyer https://disqus.com/by/bobgreenyer/ Obvious
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/06/live-video-feed-from-mfmp-feb-5th-experiments-planned/#comment-1838945044
• 40 minutes ago
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/06/live-video-feed-from-mfmp-feb-5th-experiments-planned/#comment-1838958558
I wrote:
The spike showed up on the screen after the explosion I think.
Yup. In the video above, Bang! The explosion occurs at 2:31. The spike
appears at 2:49. If the spike were already on the screen when the explosion
occurred I might suspect that it was the beginning of an anomalous
At 2.29 a white spot appears in the field of scarlet but the power going
through the coil is still nominal. This means that the reaction is not
caused by a short circuit in the heater element.
The area of white expands throughout the 2.30 timeframe and at the end of
that time period, the power to
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is premature to assume that the explosion was caused by the Rossi
effect. The temperature was rising smoothly a few seconds before it
occurred, but there seemed to be some indication of a very rapid rise
immediately before everything went haywire.
Do you believe the sensor, or your eyes?
-mi
From: James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 10:42 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dog Bone Project
The pressure release hypothesis is inconsistent with the PSI read out in the
video, which never reaches
Ryan Hunt reports that the failure mode was NOT the compression fitting
giving way under pressure - the fitting remained intact. This experiment
was of the easier Parkhomov design, posted previously where the seal was
made with a compression fitting, in this case with the use of a soft
aluminum
Ryan confirmed that the tube used was of the original Dogbone design with a
4mm ID and a 6.35mm (1/4) OD. This has a wall thickness of only 1.18mm
compared to Parkhomov's 2.5mm wall thickness. For the strength of the tube
used, the amount of LiAlH4 inserted was just too much.
Fortunately they
So the short answer is that rather than not thinking to hook up the
pressure sensor, the they thought to not do so given the exigencies of
their particular situation.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I wouldn't call that bizarre, I would call that a
Bizarre that they would think to hide behind an explosion shield -- which
is rational given prior pressure excursions -- but would not think to hook
up the pressure sensor.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob Greenyer https://disqus.com/by/bobgreenyer/
Well, this is only sort-of possible. The capillary nature of the plumbing
will make it difficult to get much of a vacuum on the portion of the
reactor that has the bulk of the volume, but it could be possible to reduce
the atmosphere by an order of magnitude.
Then you have to deal with the fact
There is a second or two delay from the time of increased heat production
and the production of radiation. A facto-fusion event would produce the
simultaneous onset of the heat/radiation occurrence.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would be hesitant
FYI:
MFMP might also want to use this plumbing setup to pump out the headspace at
the start of the run, pulling 30” of vacuum on it, to remove any
nitrogen/oxygen/etc.
Mark Jurich
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 1:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dog Bone
I wouldn't call that bizarre, I would call that a sense of
self-preservation kicking in.
Remember that these fellows have come together for only a limited time to
run these experiments. It could be that the appropriate plumbing was not
readily available to hook up the pressure sensor in a way
I saw a comment that stated the ticking sound was not from the Geiger
counter but from an H2 leak detector. Can anyone verify this?
ALso, is i possible to verify there was not an audio delay of about a
second in the video that might explain the delay in the ticking picking
up speed?
This is all true. The only reason I mentioned this, is that MFMP has gone to
the trouble of adding this beautifully working extension (which is
non-Parkhomov), they might as well use it to research other deviations once
some type of replication is done, especially if the design hasn’t been
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1404.5685v2.pdf
*Quantum Mass Acquisition in Spinor Bose-Einstein Condensate(BEC)*
*It seems that excited spin 2 spinor quasi-particles (dark mode polaritons)
become massive do to quantum fluctuations in their energy state when these
vortexes are in an excited state within a
Hello All:
Please let me know if I've made any mistakes in the analysis which follows.
Thank you...
Considering all the problems related to the Parkhomov Charge Amount and MFMP
Replication, I have decided to formulate an Engineered Version of the
Ideal Gas Law to calculate maximum
Thanks Rich.
I have read of Jones Bennie's comment where he speculates that transformer
action lies at the heart of the cold fusion phenomena. This is very close to
my logic, however, I have come up with a velocity associated with the
transformer action. The product of the nm dimension
I would be hesitant to ascribe a transient radiation detection as
necessarily due to LENR. When the reactor exploded, there could have been
fracto-fusion which is known to produce a pulse of neutrons. Also, when
the tube exploded, it shattered the silicon carbide heater that they were
using, no
Since QM applies to all physical systems, the question arises: does your
simple approach apply to systems that do not have an atomic nucleus, such
as positronium, an electron and a positron in orbit around their common
center of mass?
with appreciation, Rich Murray
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:25
Will Gravitational Waves Ever Be Found?
http://news.discovery.com/space/astronomy/bicep2-vs-planck-will-gravitational-waves-be-found-150206.htm
quotes
It’s official: data from the Planck satellite has revealed no signs
of gravitational wavesembedded in the cosmic microwave background, the
I believe they should check their sensor.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:58 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
Do you believe the sensor, or your eyes?
-mi
*From:* James Bowery [mailto:jabow...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, February 06, 2015 10:42 AM
*To:* vortex-l
*Subject:* Re:
thank you so much- great idea- in part inspired by the molten tin idea
this will be AXIL DIXIT for today in the Blog
Peter
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Peter's instinct about liquid tin as a heat transfer medium is well
founded, but in the context of
Weaponiized! Yeah!
On Friday, February 6, 2015, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
So, the test is over. No good result.
Are you kidding? They successfully replicated results experienced by
The Radiation Count Plot showed nothing strange through the whole incident.
High Voltage Particle Instrumentation is very sensitive to noise, especially
during explosions. Any anomaly in Geiger Counting at the time of the explosion
needs to address this. A common technique is to run 2 (or
From: James Bowery
Ø Geiger counter readings:
6:14:13, 8e-6
6:16:46, 9e-6
6:17:15, 3.3e-4
Ø a few seconds later BANG
Apparently, a tiny burst of either background radiation or internally generated
radiation preceded the event.
Perhaps we should be looking at the timing of
Short segment showing the explosion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfRaDY2R_Afeature=youtu.be
Craig
YAM (Yet Another Mistake):
I wrote:
Consider Charles’ Law for an Ideal Gas
should read:
Consider Amontons' Law for an Ideal Gas
(named after Guillaume Amontons)
Mark Jurich
From: Mark Jurich
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015 8:37 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Re:
Good show,
Thanks, Craig.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
Short segment showing the explosion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfRaDY2R_Afeature=youtu.be
Craig
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
So, the test is over. No good result.
Are you kidding? They successfully replicated results experienced by
both Rossi and Parkhomov. g
Watch the Dogbone BANG run https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfRaDY2R_A in
HD to see these data points.
Geiger counter readings:
6:14:13, 8e-6
6:16:46, 9e-6
6:17:15, 3.3e-4
a few seconds later BANG
The pressure went down initially from 0.7 to 0.5 the back up to 0.9 but at
no point did the PSI
favorite quote so far:
Anyone know what that is supposed to smell like?
uhh.. death.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 7:32 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Watch the Dogbone BANG run https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDfRaDY2R_A
in HD to see these data points.
Geiger counter readings:
Dear Friends,
I have published:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/we-have-vaporized-reactor-lenr-explosion.html
Where speculation is prohibited, creativity dies.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
It is my opinion that the Pressure Transducer was not working during this run,
at all. Consider Charles’ Law for an Ideal Gas ( Pressure proportional to
Temperature). In other words, P = kT, where k is some arbitrary constant (Yes,
you can start with the Ideal Gas Law, PV = nRT if you want
I wrote:
Now let’s increase the Temperature from 273 K to 1273 K (increase of 4.6
times)
should read:
Now let’s increase the Temperature from 300 K to 1273 K (increase of 4.2
times)
300 K is roughly Room Temperature.
Mark Jurich
From: Mark Jurich
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2015
Did anybody else pick this up? When the explosive sequene begins at 2:30
with a bang, the radiation counter goes wild. The counter seems to
correspond with a color change in the center of the tube from white to
scarlet that proceeds left to right on the underside of the alumina tube
until all the
At 2:29/2:30 into the short segment posted by Craig, it looks like the
right-side end-plug, or whatever is sticking out that end, blows out. And I
use that term specifically since one also sees some hint of a pressure release.
Whether that release is at an appropriate level is apparently
The pressure release hypothesis is inconsistent with the PSI read out in
the video, which never reaches 1.0.
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:39 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
At 2:29/2:30 into the short segment posted by Craig, it looks like the
right-side end-plug, or whatever is
45 matches
Mail list logo
