Re: [Vo]:OT: New Book on the Wright Brothers, by David McCullough

2015-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:


 at time of Wright brothers, US tried to catch the bandwagon by creating
 NACA, but probably state agency are no more adapted to modern innovation.
 we see with DoE.


The NACA was formed in 1915. By that time European aviation was getting
massive amounts of war funding. The U.S. did not catch up until after the
war. After 1918, the NACA did an excellent job, and by the mid-1930s the
U.S. dominated the industry, especially civilian aviation.

Orville Wright was a permanent member of the NACA Board. He was very shy
and seldom commented. Historians say that Wilbur made more intellectual
contributions to the invention, and he was a superb writer. Orville made
many practical contributions. He also came up with the movable vertical
tail, which was the last step in 3-axis control. They were both superb at
engineering physics.

- Jed


Re: [Vo]:OT: New Book on the Wright Brothers, by David McCullough

2015-05-18 Thread Daniel Rocha
So, I'd like to know about the NACA period of Orville. Maybe he had an
important part in putting the whole thing to catch up with Europe.


[Vo]:the real significance of the Shafeev paper

2015-05-18 Thread Peter Gluck
Dear Friends,

For today:

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/05/the-real-significance-of-shafeev-paper.html

It is there about a paper, by G.A. Shafeev showing a miracle
made with nanoplasmonics, This also makes LENR possible
AXIL has explained this to us many times.
You will see it.

Peter

-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com


Re: [Vo]:OT: New Book on the Wright Brothers, by David McCullough

2015-05-18 Thread Alain Sepeda
The parallel, the sad prediction with LENR is fascinating.

The fact that demo are ignored because published in less accessible place
(less accessible in the modern way, I mean not in Nature... ), and the bad
will in getting informed

the fact that most energy by the pioneer will be wasted in patent war, is a
warning to people in the field...
the fact that blossoming unplanified efforts overcame the US pioneering
show the importance of innovation ecosystem, motivation, sharing, compared
to pure intellectual property...

Nothing is new, we are warned since few years that unless we change the
logic around LENR innovation, it will be the same.
(does it remind you someone?)

at time of Wright brothers, US tried to catch the bandwagon by creating
NACA, but probably state agency are no more adapted to modern innovation.
we see with DoE.


2015-05-17 23:43 GMT+02:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:


 It isn't bad. It covers the lost years from 1906 to early 1908 in more
 detail than most biographies. During those years, the Wrights did not fly.
 They spent most of their time negotiating business deals and improving the
 motor. It is frustrating to think of it. In this book, it is frustrating to
 read how Wilbur had to spend nearly as much time convincing investors and
 customers that the airplane was a real, viable product, as he spent
 inventing the thing.

 I still say they could have cut short the time by doing better
 demonstration flights, and by using the photos and affidavits they
 collected from the flights.

 They were not experts in motors. They should have had experts working on
 that, which they concentrated on the airplane itself. They could not hire
 experts because they did not have the capital they needed. All that changed
 in August 1908 with the public flights in France and Washington DC. In the
 spring of 1908 they returned to Kitty Hawk for flight testing. Kitty Hawk
 was difficult to reach in those days. Some famous reporters made the effort
 to get there, and they published accounts of the test flights saying it is
 all true, the Wrights can fly! but the public still did not believe it.
 They should have conducted those tests in Dayton, in full view of the
 public. It would have brought about the recognition they needed months
 earlier.

 Here is one of the news reports from Kitty Hawk, Arthur Ruhl, History at
 Kill Devil Hill, Collier's, 30 May 1908:

 https://digital.lib.ecu.edu/exhibits/wright/htmlFiles/HKDH.html

 This is accurate and detailed, except that it ignores the fact that dozens
 of people had seen the earlier flights, and many had signed affidavits
 testifying as much, including a bank president. The reporters should have
 believed those people. They never interviewed them or expressed any
 curiosity. Even the local Dayton papers ignored them.

 - Jed




Re: [Vo]:OT: North Korea: What should we make of latest 'execution'?

2015-05-18 Thread Alain Sepeda
Someone told me how Staline was killed... not sure it is exact but it seems.

Staline was paranoid and was executing many people around him for real or
imaginary crimes... not so different from kim the killer today...

one day the doctor of Staline learned that he was on the list of the next
purge (it seems there was anti jews purge , attacking even non jews
doctors ).
Staline was sick, ad the doctor maintain him in his bunker, victim of a
brain stroke until he was dead.

one day the man who will learn he will be killed soon will manage to make
kim the killer disappear. A dictatorship is an exchange with all
stakeholder (giving security to the population, advantage to the elite), or
slowly it finish like V like Vendetta, or like Tunisia.

one day Kim the killer will be replaced by by a more open character like
the one in Myanmar, who will slowly normalize the relation with neighbour,
the society, the economy...



2015-05-18 8:33 GMT+02:00 Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson 
orionwo...@charter.net:

 It has been making the rounds that North Korean Defence Minister, Hyon
 Yong-chol, was purged and publicly executed by anti-aircraft gunfire. BBC
 news wrote a reasonably objective analysis of the matter. At present it is
 difficult to verify the accuracy of the claimed specifics:



 http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32749107



 Assuming the latest purge is accurate…



 It would suggest that Kim’s inexperience of leadership skills has resulted
 in him becoming terrified of anyone he perceives to be a potential alpha
 male, a rival within the bureaucracy he inherited from his farther. What I
 see are the actions of someone who believes instilling abject fear within
 the ruling party is the ticket to keeping himself safe from being bumped
 off. I suspect he is dead wrong on that. I cannot imagine the remaining
 survivalist oriented, savvy, well-entrenched old guard that is decades
 older than their 32 year old leader being willing to put up with such
 antics for much longer. Orchestrating public executions of this kind is
 highly disruptive to maintaining a sense stability and standard of living.
 Seems very likely to me that there are interesting off-the-records
 discussions occurring in obscure undisclosed quarters in the middle of the
 night. It's imperative to discover who remain fanatically loyal to Kim and
 who are waffling.



 It would not surprise me to hear of additional changes in upper management
 in the near future.



 Regards,

 Steven Vincent Johnson

 svjart.orionworks.com

 zazzle.com/orionworks





[Vo]:US Navy Purchases First Order of MagneGas

2015-05-18 Thread Lewan Mats
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-navy-purchases-first-order-of-magnegas-300083985.html

MagneGas Corporation (MagneGas or the Company) (NASDAQ: 
MNGAhttp://studio-5.financialcontent.com/prnews?Page=QuoteTicker=MNGA), a 
technology company that counts among its inventions a patented process that 
converts liquid waste into a MagneGas Fuel, announced today that following a 
specific request from the US Navy, it has successfully completed a 
demonstration using its MagneGas2(r) cutting fuel at a designated US Navy 
facility.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#Magnecule_theory

Magnecule theory

Santilli claims to have developed novel fuels, named MagneGas and 
MagneHydrogen.[10]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-10[11]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-11[12]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-12
 They are produced by plasma arc 
gasificationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_arc_gasification of liquid 
waste.[13]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-13
 Santilli claims that these fuels are composed of 
magnecules.[14]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-14[15]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-15[16]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-ijh-16
 These hypothetical particles are a type of theoretical chemical 
specieshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_species proposed by Santilli, 
distinguished from better-known species by containing a novel type of 
bondhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_bond called a magnecular bond, 
which he claims consists of atoms held together by magnetic 
fieldshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field which arise from 
toroidalhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroid polarization of their electron 
orbitalshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital.[16]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-ijh-16[17]http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-17
 Neither these claims nor the existence of magnecules have been accepted by the 
scientific community.
Magnecules have also been invoked as an explanation for a purported HHO gas


Mats
www.animpossibleinvention.comhttp://www.animpossibleinvention.com




Re: [Vo]:OT: New Book on the Wright Brothers, by David McCullough

2015-05-18 Thread Jed Rothwell
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:

So, I'd like to know about the NACA period of Orville. Maybe he had an
 important part in putting the whole thing to catch up with Europe.


I do not think he played a leading role in anything. He was a timid person.
However, he was serious and intelligent and I do not think he would have
been content to act as a mere figurehead. Pres. Wilson appointed him in
1920. I do not think he would have accepted the appointment if he did not
want to contribute.

Tom Crouch, in The Bishop's Boys describes his role in the NACA and the
Guggenheim foundation:

Orville remained a member of the NACA longer than anyone else in the
history of the committee. His record of attendance at the annual and
semiannual meetings over a period of twenty-eight years was exemplary, yet
his personal contributions had no special impact on the NACA program. He
concentrated on those issues of greatest interest to him, such as
championing the cause of the small inventors who wrote in search of advice
or assistance. He participated in discussions but rarely exercised
leadership. . . .

His service on the board overseeing the operation of the Daniel and
Florence Guggenheim Fund for the Promotion of Aeronautics fol­lowed a
similar pattern. The single most important privately funded effort to
improve the quality of American aeronautical enterprise during the interwar
years, the Guggenheim Fund began operation in 1926 and went out of business
in 1930. . . .

The members of the Guggenheim board funded pioneering research leading to
the development of early blind-flying instruments and sponsored the most
important of all U.S. aircraft safety competitions. The fund was
short-lived but had an extraordinary impact. Through his faithful
attendance at meetings and his participation in the deliber­ations of the
board, Orville helped to shape a program of lasting importance. His name
was a distinct asset to the work of the fund. As in the case of the NACA,
however, he rarely exercised leadership on the Guggenheim board.


- Jed


Re: [Vo]:OT: New Book on the Wright Brothers, by David McCullough

2015-05-18 Thread James Bowery
It is easy to underestimate the impact of the Kelly Act in all of this
history.

*The Kelly Act of 1925 (Contract Airmail Act)
http://web.bryant.edu/~ehu/h364proj/sprg_98/bolduc/act1925.htm*

The Kelly Act of 1925 was provoked by the vision of *Juan Trippe*
http://web.bryant.edu/~ehu/h364proj/sprg_98/bolduc/trippe.htm*.* He used
his Yale influence to persuade a fellow Yale friend, Congressman Clyde
Kelly (chairman of the House Post Office Committee), to introduce an act
that would open the flying of airmail to private contractors. The Kelly Act
put commercial aviation firmly in private hands, averting any prospect that
this industry would grow as an arm of the state. This act authorized the
U.S. Post Office Department to sign contracts with private companies for
carrying the mail at rates ranging up to $3 per pound, rates that amount to
government subsidies for airlines. It is this act that ultimately enables
the airline industry to evolve.

Likewise the impact of the Launch Services Purchase Act of 1990 about which I
testified before Congress in 1991
http://web.archive.org/web/20081212071704/http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/testimny.htm.
It is likely that Lori Garver (then head of the National Space Society and
generally favoring NASA launch technology development) would not have
changed her orientation to favor commercial launch technology
development, thereby
enabling SpaceX
http://spacenews.com/36673exit-interview-a-brief-conversation-with-outgoing-nasa-deputy-administrator/,
were it not for the battle we fought to get the LSPA passed.


On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:

 Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:


 at time of Wright brothers, US tried to catch the bandwagon by creating
 NACA, but probably state agency are no more adapted to modern innovation.
 we see with DoE.


 The NACA was formed in 1915. By that time European aviation was getting
 massive amounts of war funding. The U.S. did not catch up until after the
 war. After 1918, the NACA did an excellent job, and by the mid-1930s the
 U.S. dominated the industry, especially civilian aviation.

 Orville Wright was a permanent member of the NACA Board. He was very shy
 and seldom commented. Historians say that Wilbur made more intellectual
 contributions to the invention, and he was a superb writer. Orville made
 many practical contributions. He also came up with the movable vertical
 tail, which was the last step in 3-axis control. They were both superb at
 engineering physics.

 - Jed




[Vo]:OT: North Korea: What should we make of latest 'execution'?

2015-05-18 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
It has been making the rounds that North Korean Defence Minister, Hyon
Yong-chol, was purged and publicly executed by anti-aircraft gunfire. BBC
news wrote a reasonably objective analysis of the matter. At present it is
difficult to verify the accuracy of the claimed specifics:

 

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32749107

 

Assuming the latest purge is accurate.

 

It would suggest that Kim's inexperience of leadership skills has resulted
in him becoming terrified of anyone he perceives to be a potential alpha
male, a rival within the bureaucracy he inherited from his farther. What I
see are the actions of someone who believes instilling abject fear within
the ruling party is the ticket to keeping himself safe from being bumped
off. I suspect he is dead wrong on that. I cannot imagine the remaining
survivalist oriented, savvy, well-entrenched old guard that is decades older
than their 32 year old leader being willing to put up with such antics for
much longer. Orchestrating public executions of this kind is highly
disruptive to maintaining a sense stability and standard of living. Seems
very likely to me that there are interesting off-the-records discussions
occurring in obscure undisclosed quarters in the middle of the night. It's
imperative to discover who remain fanatically loyal to Kim and who are
waffling. 

 

It would not surprise me to hear of additional changes in upper management
in the near future.

 

Regards,

Steven Vincent Johnson

svjart.orionworks.com

zazzle.com/orionworks

 



Re: [Vo]:US Navy Purchases First Order of MagneGas

2015-05-18 Thread Alain Sepeda
If I read well, the claim of Magnegas is that it cuts metal faster than
acetylene  ?

One possibility is that the theory is wrong, and the practice is right ?

2015-05-18 10:25 GMT+02:00 Lewan Mats mats.le...@nyteknik.se:


 http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/us-navy-purchases-first-order-of-magnegas-300083985.html



 MagneGas Corporation (MagneGas or the Company) (NASDAQ: MNGA
 http://studio-5.financialcontent.com/prnews?Page=QuoteTicker=MNGA), a
 technology company that counts among its inventions a patented process that
 converts liquid waste into a MagneGas Fuel, announced today that following
 a specific request from the US Navy, it has successfully completed a
 demonstration using its MagneGas2® cutting fuel at a designated US Navy
 facility.




 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#Magnecule_theory


  Magnecule theory

 Santilli claims to have developed novel fuels, named MagneGas and
 MagneHydrogen.[10]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-10
 [11]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-11
 [12]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-12
  They are produced by plasma arc gasification
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_arc_gasification of liquid waste.
 [13]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-13
  Santilli claims that these fuels are composed of *magnecules*.[14]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-14
 [15]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-15
 [16]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-ijh-16
  These hypothetical particles are a type of theoretical chemical species
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_species proposed by Santilli,
 distinguished from better-known species by containing a novel type of bond
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_bond called a magnecular bond,
 which he claims consists of atoms held together by magnetic fields
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field which arise from toroidal
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toroid polarization of their electron
 orbitals http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_orbital.[16]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-ijh-16
 [17]
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruggero_Santilliredirect=no#cite_note-17
  Neither these claims nor the existence of magnecules have been accepted
 by the scientific community.

 Magnecules have also been invoked as an explanation for a purported HHO
 gas





 Mats

 www.animpossibleinvention.com