Merging Holmlid and HeffnerNow that I have studied the Heffner paper identified
by Jones, I understand the potential connection between of UDD (Rydberg matter)
and the possibility of catalyzing a reaction among nucleons and electrons. It
suggests a mechanism to explain the Holmlid LENR and also
http://www.gizmag.com/physicist-smartphones-pocket-cosmic-ray-detectors/34121/
App turns a smartphone into a pocket-sized cosmic ray detector
We talked about this many times.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Russ and Jones--
>
> Steve Jones had a method for catching negative
Merging Holmlid and HeffnerRuss and Jones--
Steve Jones had a method for catching negative muons in hydrogen to effect a
muon catalyzed fusion reaction. That fusion reaction would produce a good
signature to suggest the presence of muons. I think a batch of liquid hydrogen
behind a high densi
Russ George wrote:
What part of my qualifying word about Rossi’s test “as openly” did you not
> understand.
>
I understand perfectly, but I disagree. He has not been very open. He has
repeatedly withheld critical details. He has refused to answer questions,
or to allow qualified people to attend
Yes, dig up that old aquarium in the garage or attic and get some dry ice. Here
is a design that uses Peltiers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqM4CsM4ewI
From: Axil Axil
>From the top of my head, a cloud chamber...
Russ George wrote:
What might be a variety of means, lo
From: Russ George
Ø What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target
and emission be?
Muons are generally absorbed in linear proportion to the atomic number of the
target.
Since Uranium would be among the best targets, and since the secondary
reactions wou
Having said all that . . .
I believe that Rossi took part in the first Levi experiment, which was
pretty good. He deserves credit for that. He reportedly played no role in
Lugano. Perhaps it would have been better if he had.
His work is sometimes sloppy, but I have seen worse. I guess that is
dam
The normal expectation of re-emission might not be happening in LENR.
Holmlid produces many billions of high speed neutral particle fragments per
laser shot whose speed is a goodly fraction of the speed of light. And yet,
Holmlid is still alive. The gamma radiation that should be produced when
thes
What about a secondary muon target re-emitter… what would the ideal target and
emission be?
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:38 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner
>From the top of my head, a cloud chamber...
On S
Mesons production implies that protons and neutrons are being destabilized
and are decaying. Kaon formation is very strange because of the symmetry
violations that kaon formation implies. What this state of affairs means
for the various nuclei in the volume that this decay is happening is not
defin
What part of my qualifying word about Rossi’s test “as openly” did you not
understand. I see no complaints about Rossi’s work coming from those who have a
history of work at the lab bench as opposed to the keyboards. Of course there
is no end of whining from many who are his ‘competitors’ and se
>From the top of my head, a cloud chamber...
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Russ George wrote:
> What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low
> energy muons?
>
>
>
> *From:* Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM
> *To:*
What might be a variety of means, low tech to high tech, to detect low
energy muons?
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Merging Holmlid and Heffner
The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is still
The deflation hypothesis of Horace Heffner is still of significant interest
- but seldom discussed. Here is the paper
http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/DeflationFusion2.pdf
There is a new twist which is possible to consider on this hypothesis since
it was last updated. (The following suggestion
Russ George wrote:
> I for one have no end of admiration for Rossi in performing his test so
> diligently and as openly as he has done.
>
He has not been open. He has withheld many critical details.
The tests he has published have been poorly done and not convincing, in my
opinion and in the o
It seems to me that all the chatter about the 350 day term of Rossi’s test is
just so much babble from armchair dilletantes. It is tantamount to trolling. I
for one have no end of admiration for Rossi in performing his test so
diligently and as openly as he has done. In the face of the nasty tro
>From some very personal reasons- a shorter issue today.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/02/feb-21-2016-lenr-executive-summary-of.html
all the best to you!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Jed,
I would expect the 350-day term to be a condition in some kind of agreement,
e.g. something between IH and Rossi.
To me it looks like a condition set up by managers, not engineers, who want to
find a water proof condition for making sure the technology is valid, not only
for themselves but
18 matches
Mail list logo
