Is it not true that the mass is conserved when an electron and positron combine
and two photons emerge? The total mass-energy is the same.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Philippe Hatt
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 6:09 AM
To: Jürg Wyttenbach
Cc: bobcook39...@hotmail.com;
janv. 2018 à 17:04, Dave Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> a écrit :
Is it not true that the mass is conserved when an electron and positron combine
and two photons emerge? The total mass-energy is the same.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Philippe Hatt
Sent: Thursday, January 25
Robin,
I guess I do not understand how many far away objects would get information
about the conversion that takes place. If the mass equivalent remains the same
and its center also is conserved then what is different? Of course the photons
would interact differently than the two particles
I believe that the theory is that those falling into the black hole see time as
being normal. Only outside viewers see time slow down.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 2:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Podcast of
I just read the article and was left wondering whether or not the hydrogen
deposited upon the surface of the metal made it much more reflective at the
frequency of the laser. That might explain why it took so much longer to cut
the metal. Does anyone know whether or not the actual energy
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2019 7:31 AM
To: bobcook39...@hotmail.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com; jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Magmo in the land of lost wages...
I want to let Vortex folks know that I did not merely hear about the Manelas
device.
Nice sized flywheel. Could store a lot of energy so it is going to be hard to
prove that the magnets are the real source. I am skeptical.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Terry Blanton
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 8:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Magmo in the land
The discussion of a violation of the conservation of energy or angular momentum
perked up my curiosity. I have searched many times for a trick that gets
around the rules to no avail. So, I decided to simulate a simple yet elegant
model system that I think might be of interest to the group.
My
Vibrator, I am confident that if you confine your concept to a closed system
that both the angular momentum and angular energy will be conserved. In a
simple case of a rotating object, if the MoI is changed by a factor of two,
then the object spin will speed up or down by that factor. And,
Interesting results. One question I have is what material is used as a gasket
between the end flanges and the SS reaction chamber? It is hard to believe
that nothing is required to prevent leaks.
Dave
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 5:18 PM
In my opinion, the rate at which heat energy is removed from the casing by the
airflow is a strong controller of the reaction stability. As expected, as long
as the internally generated heat due to the reaction is less than the amount of
heat energy escaping through the case at a given
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Dave Roberson
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2019 1:40 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:It is unlikely Mizuno’s results are a mistake
Interesting results. One question I have is what material is used as a gasket
between the end flanges and the SS
12 matches
Mail list logo
