Robin, I guess I do not understand how many far away objects would get information about the conversion that takes place. If the mass equivalent remains the same and its center also is conserved then what is different? Of course the photons would interact differently than the two particles but that effect would be localized I think.
Does Mills suspect that the gravitational mass is different between photons and electrons of the same energy? Dave Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 2:20 PM To: email@example.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Podcast of interest In reply to Dave Roberson's message of Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:17:02 -0500: Hi, [snip] >I realize that mass and energy are two different forms of existence, but >should we expect the remainder of the universe to know this has happened other >than by the interactions between the two objects before and after the event >and other particles. > >Dave If I understand Mills correctly, then he says that it precisely the conversion of mass into energy that causes the expansion of the universe. IOW, yes the rest of the universe does know. Regards, Robin van Spaandonk local asymmetry = temporary success