theories (e.g., neutron capture), this may be moot.
I have some more data, but not enough time to post it right now.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
I'm learning more and more how different the worlds of quantum mechanics
and high energy physics are from that of everyday experience
Andre,
This may be a preview of what he presented:
Coupling between a deuteron and a lattice
P. L. Hagelstein, I. U. Chaudhary
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2159
-- Lou Pagnucco
Andre Blum wrote:
Hi,
I may have missed this, but does anyone have more details about or a
pointer to Peter
.pdf)
All just guesses, though.
-- Lou Pagnucco
MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
[NOTE: I changed the Subject line, but this msg was sparked by Lou
Pagnucco's posting Thursday, July 05, 2012 11:06 AM]
Well, from a qualitative reading of the paper referred to in Lou's
posting,
it would appear
Coldfusionnow.org posted the following video today:
Robert Duncan discusses experiments at Sidney Kimmel Institute for Nuclear
Renaissance
http://coldfusionnow.org/robert-duncan-discusses-experiments-at-sidney-kimmel-institute-for-nuclear-renaissance/
Scientists developing pulsed nuclear fusion system for distant missions
(Phys.org) -- The ticket to Mars and beyond may be a series of nuclear
slapshots that use magnetic pulses to slam nuclei into each other inside
hockey pucks made of a special, lightweight salt.
A physics team from The
A very good question that involves the issue of self-energy and/or
effective mass of electrons in plasmas and currents.
A contentious issue.
I am looking for papers on scattering experiments that elucidate this -
especially involving ballistic currents or plasmons in nanostructures.
Jojo Jaro
Yogi Berra allegedly said:
Theoretically, the theoretical and the empirical are the same
- empirically, they're not
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo Jaro wrote:
What you are saying is the current carrying capacity of a conductor is
proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor. That is true
only
of ballistic.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Lou Pagnucco wrote:
Jojo,
I believe in both metal nanowires and carbon SWNTs, current density is
directly related to radius^2 - Refer to equation(1), page 1 of -
Stability of Metal Nanowires at Ultrahigh Current Densities
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cond-mat/0411058v3.pdf
absolute purity?
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo Jaro wrote:
I read these patents and most of it is beyond my ability and skill. And
they're mostly about how to produce SWNTs, which no distinction between
the Metallic SWNTs from the Semiconducting SWNT varieties.
I've found many papers discussing production
?
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo Jaro wrote:
I read these patents and most of it is beyond my ability and skill. And
they're mostly about how to produce SWNTs, which no distinction between
the Metallic SWNTs from the Semiconducting SWNT varieties.
I've found many papers discussing production of SWNTs
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1005.0345v1
- Lou Pagnucco
Jojo Jaro wrote:
Interesting paper Lou.
This is giving me some more to chew on. Might it be possible that Rossi
is
processing his Nickel powder with the expressed goal of creating
Quasi-One-Dimensional Nickel tubules. These nanosized
Since some readers on this list are experimenters, I thought I would
post the following news release:
Scientists establish link between autoimmune diseases and nanoparticles
http://www.news-medical.net/news/20120612/Scientists-establish-link-between-autoimmune-diseases-and-nanoparticles.aspx
David,
I don't think your test will work.
The 782 keV figure assumes no additional energy is lost in producing
neutrons. Second, you have to assume you can get the process to work in
Be.
The cooling effect (albeit totally infinitesimal) should occur if you use
a stream of super-cooled
dissipate quickly in high temperatures, and also are subject to
dynamical constraints. I would be surprised if they could couple to a
proton and form anything analogous to muonic hydrogen.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
Sorry -- mis-transcription. That's 511 KeV for the electron.
Eric
neutrons should be found may be correct.
However, the interaction of low energy neutrons with nanoparticles, or
surfaces with nano-topography seems complicated, so I'm unsure.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
Ed Storms brings up an excellent point about neutron-based explanations.
Here is my
-sections to capture low energy
neutrons, the enrichment would probably not help if W-L neutrons are
responsible.
(The Lattice Energy website on Nickel-Seed LENR Networks that may have a
more complete analysis than mine.)
Rossi claims the e-cat LENR results from Ni-proton capture.
-- Lou Pagnucco
- Prelas, Miley, et al, research.missouri.edu/vcr_seminar/Prelas.ppt
-- could be checked this way?
While a negative result would not be completely definitive, a positive one
would certainly be.
--- Lou Pagnucco
involving many coherently moving charges
cannot
be reduced to high energy collisions involving single charged particles.
I do like Storms's approach.
I wonder whether the surface cracks serve as notch antennas which can
focus incident fields many thousands of times.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jaro Jaro
energy can
dwarf its kinetic energy in nanostructures.
For example, see (and plug in some nano-sized numbers into formulas at:)
How Much of Magnetic Energy Is Kinetic Energy?
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/kinetic.pdf
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jaro Jaro wrote:
Just to add to my
it as delocalized.
Equating the energy an electron can deliver during a collision only with
its kinetic energy is probably pretty accurate when sparsely distributed
particles collide in accelerators, but not when in dense coherent beams.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jaro wrote:
Yes, Lou's freight train analogy
Excellent questions.
I will try to find some good references.
But, I think only masochists try to understand magnetism.
Dave Roberson wrote:
What happens if you assume a frame of reference that is at the same
velocity as the moving electrons? No relative motion exists under that
condition
.
-- Lou Pagnucco
Jaro Jaro wrote:
Hey Gang, I tried posting Ed Storm's new paper as an attachment to this
forum as per Ed's request but it did not post properly.
Hopefully, Jed has it posted on his site already. Jed, is it up on your
site?
What do you guys think of Ed Storm's new model
determine what those are.
David Roberson wrote:
The half life of Ni63 is 98.7 years. That path would not be useful in
Rossi's device.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: pagnucco pagnu...@htdconnect.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 5, 2012 11:14 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:about
-isomeric isotopes.
I wonder if isomeric isotopes might have beta-decay modes which regular
isotopes do not.
Lou Pagnucco
Lou Pagnucco wrote:
Good point, David
I should have checked that first.
Unless huge amounts of Ni63 are created, it would not be useful.
Perhaps, the Ni65 is viable since
wind
up with about an excess of over 0.006[u] energy - close to your
calculation.
I am not sure whether you are proposing direct proton capture via
screening. If not, it looks like either W-L theory, or hydrinos could
explain the transmutations Rossi is claiming.
Lou Pagnucco
ny.min wrote:
http
to consider the coulomb barrier. Excess energy is released, if we
assume the conversion of electron+proton--to--neutron takes approximately
780 Kev. So W-L theory, or hydrinos, or some kind of screening, could
explain the transmutations, if they are real.
Lou Pagnucco
David Roberson wrote:
I took
David,
Can you explain your conclusion.
I can't see how any energy is released in these Ni -- Cu transmutations.
Lou Pagnucco
David Roberson wrote:
I may have been a bit to fast in pointing out the possible endothermic
nature of the Ni62 and Ni64 reactions. They actually are the best two
Some of the authors have a similar paper in ICCF-15 and also at
http://jcfrs.org/file/jcf10-proceedings.pdf
Looks like localized hot fusion, and also appears to be sensitive to
experimental parameters.
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Hybrid this that and the other cold fusion:
Phys. Rev. C 85, 054620
to Nanospire's.
I do not know enough about cavitation-LENR to have an opinion on it.
Lou Pagnucco
Jed Rothwell wrote:
http://www.lenrforum.eu
an EMP large enough to cause a cascading failure.
Looking at the state of politics, there is no reason for optimism.
Lou Pagnucco
Mark Goldes wrote:
Vo,
A pair of little reported Time Bombs threaten to end billions of human
lives.
The first is the Fuel Ponds at Fukushima. A highly probable
From http://brillouinenergy.blogspot.com/ ---
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
We have closed our first round of funding this month, and are now
completing negotiations to collaborate with SRI -www.sri.com - on our 3rd
generation boiler design. Stay tuned as we will be redesigning an updated
wet boiler
in colloids of
metal micro- and nano-particles. I am not sure how intense the resulting
electromagnetic fields or temperatures are. It is improbable that this
explains LENR, but maybe it's worth at least a look at whether Rossi or
Defkalion have found optimum operating points for this effect.
Lou Pagnucco
- and nano-particles. I am not sure how intense the
resulting
electromagnetic fields or temperatures are. It is improbable that this
explains LENR, but maybe it's worth at least a look at whether Rossi or
Defkalion have found optimum operating points for this effect.
Lou Pagnucco
Peter Gluck
I would not repeat that experiment.
See 'Nanoparticles May Cause Kidney and Brain Damage'
http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/09/20/nanoparticles-may-cause-kidney-and-brain-damage/
Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Can Cause Brain Damage in Fish
Another common type of nanoparticle is
.
Lou Pagnucco
Peter Gluck wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
A nice comment has inspired me to write:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2012/05/sequel-to-my-way-to-lenr-truth.html
It is actually a question, a bit rhetoric but if the things go well
it could be really interesting
The Page Info states -
Modified: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 3:36:53 PM
I am not sure if that means it was uploaded at that time.
On 2012-05-24 12:57, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Here's a related blog post by Dennis Bushnell (Chief Scientist, NASA
Langley Research Center). I don't know
And, if the calculations in the paper -
ESTIMATION OF ENERGY RELEASE IN PROTON-21 EXPERIMENTS
http://www.proton21.com.ua/publ/Proton21_Energy_EN.pdf
- are correct, the process is exothermic.
So it may not have energy costs if the energy generated can be recaptured.
Alan J Fletcher on Tue, 22
Thanks,
Slide #14, entitled Hypotheses, lists the major theories -
- Electron Screening (Parmenter Lamb)
- Band States (Chubb Chubb)
- Shrunken Hydrogen (Maly, Vavra Mills)
- Ultra Low Momentum Neutrons (Widom Larsen)
- Dislocation Loops (Hora Miley)
- Bose-Einstein Condensates (Kim)
anyone know which?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Interesting.
Hopefully, costs of made-to-spec nanoparticles is coming down.
It would make Patterson-cell/Miley experiments easier to do.
Axil wrote:
Prebuilt nanowires
Reference:
http://www.chkiang.rice.edu/docs/US7112315.pdf
This patent describes how to build single walled nanotubes
-destructive.
Since LENR activity is so finicky, and singular in parameter space, do you
think the 'distortions' mentioned above, would change results?
Lou Pagnucco
This:
Using Electrons to Map Nanoparticle Atomic Structures:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120504110404.htm
can
stabilized it at very high
temperatures
and when I say very high I mean it. We understood the reason
of the instability, so now the work is going on hard.
Warmest Regards,
A.R.
So, given the above and Defkalion's claims, do you think either has a
reasonable chance of being correct?
Lou Pagnucco
Extremely childish.
Isn't this site moderated?
You do not need sound to appreciate the metaphorical message ...
http://www.youtube.com/embed/xWMkOwq2qIU?rel=0
://www.slideserve.com/dallon/d-d-fusion-neutrons-from-a-strong-spherical-shock-wave-focused-on-a-deuterium-bubble-in-water
The signal-to-noise level in LENR reporting is still way too low.
Cheers,
Lou Pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote:
-Original Message-
From: pagnu...@htdconnect.com
Jones,
I realize that I did not make clear in my earlier reply, that I am not
advocating in any way for sonofusion.
What I am looking for is any reasonable case in which LENR (likely) occurs
without large local current flow on a metal surface. Some of the
sonofusion papers suggest they inject a
/StringhamRwhenbubble.pdf
Nanospires Cavitation Re-Entrant Jets Useful in Micro-Nano Fabrication
http://www.nanotech-now.com/news.cgi?story_id=44551
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Peter Gluck wrote:
My dear Friends,
In case that VORTEX has resurrected, is alive
and focused on essential problems. perhaps
This could be the case also.
It seems that most reported LENR surface phenomena result when intense
local currents are generated either locally by superfocusing of e-m energy
by nanostructures, or, maybe by these plasma jets from collapsing bubbles,
by electron arcs/beams, or by current filaments
A new paper, perhaps of interest to some. Maybe relevant to LENR -
Localized surface plasmon modes in a system of two
interacting metallic cylinders
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.5773v1.pdf
The simulations show enormous enhancement of incident e-m fields
between two parallel nanorods (radii ~ 50
How does the initiating step differ from the electron-capture
proposed in W-L papers?
Hasn't someone here rebutted the physics of e-c capture?
Not freshly minted?
Jones Beene wrote:
Well, the short answer is instantaneous. The Brillo boys are using a
variant
of W-L theory, which to the
irregularities, e.g., tips and/or fissures, forming
superfocusing e-m antennas (or notch antennas) are necessary for LENR?
- Would you suggest any approaches to embrittle metal hydride surfaces to
accelerate appearance of LENR?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
My dear Friends,
Ed Storms' CF Students Guide
Brief Video -
Plasma Fusion -- hoax or breakthrough reality?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49p0cZEisTA
Any opinions on whether aneutronic fusion research is being shortchanged?
Team,
Sorry to disappoint, but I own no shop.
However, if the tech you refer to is real, it should be easy to set up a
persuasive public demo.
LP
Teampositive wrote:
Pagnucco,
If the boys in the back of your NJ shop are successfully finished their
free Lattice Energy through arc plasmas
No. Not me. But I did spend most of my life in the semiconductor business,
too.
Pagnucco
Lou Pagnucco, Kulite Semiconductor Products Inc, Leonia, NJ Â
Not you?
Sorry.
Â
The video clip from The Larry King Show shows a clip of a UFO that I
would bet is ball lightning.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmh2NJxc3BQ
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
hello,
how about ball lightnings?
First of all, are they real, i.e. has anyone or does anyone know someone
who has seen such
IF Rossi's e-cat is real, it never made sense that anyone would use
a world changing technology for something as mundane as heating a
industrial building.
What are the odds Rossi is stating the facts? (See below.)
Lou Pagnucco
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=614cpage=1#comment
It would be interesting to know if some of these (and maybe other bursty)
phenomena were due to self-sustaining generation of micro-fractures -
i.e., some kind of tipping into a phase transition.
Also, it would interesting to know if the protons seen long after energy
production stops in
First, I have to say I am not sure Piantelli's observations are real.
Maybe he had faulty instruments. But, if he did see protons, and they
were from decaying neutrons (sequestered in some decay-attenuating niche),
then, he should have seen electrons (and probably some X-rays), I think.
But,
. Brillouin's video claims that (W-L theory) electron capture
initiates a reaction chain that ends with alpha-particle production.
Do you communicate with McKubre and have any update on his theory?
- especially wrt Brillouin's LENR hypothesis.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote
Terry Blanton wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:08 AM, fusion.calo...@gmail.com
fusion.calo...@gmail.com wrote:
Where there is He there is Rossi Fusion.
He has never been claimed to be a byproduct of the Rossi eCat.
Terry,
That does not mean it's not there, though.
It should be checked for.
unfortunate enough to collide with one.
I will try to find a local college with appropriate lab resources.
There's a slim chance I can get it done.
Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery.
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote
). Shouldn't gamma energies
and directions change as current flow is modulated? If not, is the
calculated effective electron momentum incorrect, are the electron surface
density or scattering cross-sections too low, or is my interpretation
wrong?
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote
a few radioactive gamma sources inside nanowires
and observing whether gammas are attenuated and/or directionally scattered
during current flow?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 08:59 AM 4/5/2012, Jones Beene wrote:
This is hot, so to speak. Cough, cough ... that can be understood
Jones,
Sure, some of those experiments produce hot plasmas, but there are many
experimental results which appear to produce transmutations with
temperatures too low to produce collisions energetic enough for fusion -
unless the energy is focused and hidden in infinitesimal volumes.
My
Jones,
Good points.
I do not know the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect. I will research it tonight.
There could be a number of confounding effects that coexist.
Our tendency to look for a relativistic collision behind every nuclear
event (except radioactivity) could be the problem.
Lou Pagnucco
resources.
There's a slim chance I can get it done.
Probably expensive. Too bad I lost the lottery.
Lou Pagnucco
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 03:29 PM 4/5/2012, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd,
Regarding the absence of gammas -
... is it reasonable to suppose that a high energy gamma would
exploding wire experiment did appear to produce Helium.
Their original paper is -
EXPERIMENTAL ATTEMPTS TO DECOMPOSE TUNGSTEN AT HIGH TEMPERATURES
- Amer. Chem. Soc. 44 (1922)
http://www.uf.narod.ru/science/WendtIrion.pdf
Would this provide some link between CF and LENR if reproduced?
Lou Pagnucco
in how magnetic fields can act as reservoirs
for delocalized momentum, you might want to read -
Thoughts on the magnetic vector potential Am.J.Phys. Nov-1996
http://www.uccs.edu/~jmarsh2/links/AJP-64-11-1361.pdf
Lou Pagnucco
Eric Walker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
Lewis Larsen (Lattice Energy LLC) has posted a new presentation entitled -
Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
New neutron data consistent with WLS mechanism in lightning - at -
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen
He presents evidence that electrons and protons in coherent/collective
motion
Brillouin's website and the paper describing their theory at -
http://www.brillouinenergy.com
http://www.brillouinenergy.com/BrillouinEnergyHypothesis.pdf
gives more details.
I believe that a number of metal alloys are used for hydrogen storage.
It makes sense that they do not limit materials to
There are several prediction markets that allow legal wagers on political,
economic, technological, ..., events.
The Wikipedia page at -
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction_market - lists and describes them:
Prediction markets (also known as predictive markets, information
markets, decision
You make a excellent point, Jed.
I have heard accusations that some of these markets may have been
manipulated by certain political election campaigns. It probably doesn't
require a huge investment to move the odds.
However, these markets are probably too small for a major corporation to
make
it, or misunderstood part of the
application.
Does anyone have any insight?
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Axil wrote:
http://www.google.com/patents?id=nWbjAQAAEBAJpg=PA2source=gbs_selected_pagescad=2#v=onepageqf=false
Energy Generation Apparatus and Method
This patent application explains the mechanism for the H
http://coldfusionnow.org/?p=15344
In nano-particles/wires/structures, ambient electric and magnetic fields
can be superfocused and amplified by a factor of ~50K. This seems quite
counter-intuitive and pretty spectacular.
I appreciate the interesting responses to my questions Xavier. From the
information you supplied I draw
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
To be presented March 22, at The Woodslands, TX at
NETS (Nuclear and Emerging Technologies for Space meeting)
http://anstd.ans.org/NETS2012/NETS2012Home.html
Corrections:
Title line should read 350W/Kg - date is March 23 - session URL is
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
Does anyone know whether Dick Smith's offer extends to Miley's lab, and
whether Miley would accept?
Lou Pagnucco
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low
:
Corrections:
Title line should read 350W/Kg - date is March 23 - session URL is
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/sess462.pdf
Does anyone know whether Dick Smith's offer extends to Miley's lab, and
whether Miley would accept?
Lou Pagnucco
A Game-Changing Power Source Based
Lewis Larsen has just posted a presentation on W-L theory
covering both history and theory. It is timely, since one
of W-L's proponents (Y.N. Srivastava) will be co-presenting
at CERN with Celani on March 22.
A closer look at LENRs in condensed matter systems
George Miley and Xiaoling Yang have just published the abstract -
A Game-Changing Power Source Based on Low Energy Nuclear Reactions (LENRs)
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/nets2012/pdf/3051.pdf
- which will be presented in the
ADVANCED CONCEPTS: LENR, ANTI-MATTER, AND NEW PHYSICS Session
Axil,
Miley, et al, are working on Ni-H cells also.
I am getting the impression that the old timer LENR researchers are hung
up on deuterium and Helium 4 ash as the only true path toward LENR
success.
Not true. Ni-H is the golden path ahead. You will find gold where others
are finding it,
Tech Bubble 2.0: It's a Private Thing
http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/ipo-facebook-ipo-social-media-social/2/22/2012/id/39516
Along with private, secretive dark pool markets, investment markets
appear to be becoming exclusive clubs.
Hope this doesn't happen to LENR, if it
Jones,
There too many theories to be partisan. They all may be wrong.
First - E-C cannot occur in hydrogen.
Probably true, but plasma is not hydrogen.
Plasma e-p wave functions are not stationary.
Second - I agree - relativistic collisions can be ruled out.
That's why I conjectured direct
, nonlocality, Bose condenscation, ... really needed?
I'm uncertain. Good data is hard to find.
Thanks for the reply,
Lou Pagnucco
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Alain Sepeda wrote:
if you red WL theory, they say that the neutrons are generated
from coherents pairs of p+e, and the result is a group of possible
I believe that W=L theory proposes that LENR is initiated by strong
focusing of E-M fields on metal hydride surfaces. I may be
misunderstanding, but wouldn't activation energy loss be too small to
detect in the energy released?
I don't understand Jones Beenes' point.
If correct - how do neutrons
Too many points to address.
Perhaps, the Celani-Srivastava presentation at the March 22 CERN LENR
Colloquium will discuss them, since Srivastava is a proponent.
Jones Beene wrote:
Well - all of us on vortex would love to be able to focus on a consistent
theory that works. W-L theory seems
an good analogy would be an arrow. Only the
tip's electrostatic coupling to the rest of the arrow gives it piercing
power.
BTW, I am not sure of any of the above. Just speculating.
I welcome corrections.
Thanks for the reply,
Lou Pagnucco
Jones Beene wrote on Mon, 20 Feb 2012:
-Original
Hopefully, this helps -
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/news/2007/1999-RussGeorge-APS-Presentation.pdf
I'm attempting to obtain a copy of Production of Helium-Four from
Deuterium Using Nano-Particle Palladium by Russ George, published in the
May 6, 1999 issue of Cold Fusion Times on page 1.
Microstructures
http://www.cmth.ph.ic.ac.uk/photonics/Newphotonics/pdf/lfplslet.pdf
Comments/corrections very welcome,
Lou Pagnucco
I have a hard time seeing why Rossi would pay any attention to this:
(1) If his e-cat is real, $1M is a miniscule distraction.
(2) If it's a mistake or fraud, replying would foolish.
On 2012-02-14 17:14, Chemical Engineer wrote:
_Smith Offers $1 Million Prize for Successful E-Cat Demo_
Better still, if Smith is convinced the e-cat is not real, why not pledge
the $1M to a worthy cause if it's not verified by end of 2012?
- or offer bets through an on-line site like intrade.com?
Otherwise, it's hard to be sure he's not a flamboyant publicity seeker.
An X-Prize would be an
Rossi is certainly an enigmatic character, but it is highly improbable
that he would slow his race with Defkalion if they both have real LENR
technology for such a small amount, nor would Rossi accept it if e-cat is
a fraud. Either way, Smith can be pretty sure his offer will receive no
response.
Since Energetics Technologies (featured on 2009 60 Minutes tv-show) uses
ultrasound -
Ultrasonically-excited electrolysis Experiments at Energetics Technologies
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/DardikIultrasonic.pdf
- is it possible that their wideband ultrasound is really inducing
cavitation fusion
Perhaps, someone could devise a long-running magnetic energy extractor
building on the simple approach in:
A Magnetic Linear Accelerator
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/~mcdonald/examples/lin_accel.pdf
If so, I bet it would be popular in toy stores.
William Beaty wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012,
of high-temp Cooper-pairing, plasmons, and anomalous
fusion. Some other papers by the author also address this issue:
http://arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Dvornikov_M/0/1/0/all/0/1
Any opinions on this series of papers?
- Lou Pagnucco
Axil Axil wrote:
When protons enter a micro cavity
On a 2008 CNN Larry King Show, former air force officials showed videos of
UFOs which I think may be ball lightning.
The videos are available starting at --
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTBqwTuSuMM
Has anyone seen these?
If so, any opinion on whether ball lightning is a good explanation?
.
Is it possible the lightning ball was due to some unusual localized
lasing effect leading to the theorized isotopic changes?
- Lou Pagnucco
Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
Equation for Light Leptonic Magnetic Monopole and its Experimental Aspects
Georges Lochak
http://arxiv.org/abs
Jones,
You wrote:
The video in question demonstrates that even a bulb not designed to
operate as a plasma emitter, can create an local plasma, and produce
copious light with a few watts of input (like the CFL which can operate
at a subwatt level).
Did the experiment measure radiant+thermal
to (somehow) close the loop in this huge state-space to stay in the
tiny and elusive stable optimal operating spaces.
Thanks,
Lou Pagnucco
Lou,
This kind of photon stimulation was of great interest a few years ago and
is
known as the Letts/Cravens effect. They had a tortuous path to get
Marten,
You might want to google or bing nickel nanowire grow or nickel whisker
grow.
Some of these techiques are hazardous, so better use extreme caution.
My guess is that (poly-)crystalline nanostructures are most promising.
Hello guys
I have a q, i have been reading all the posts about
Along those lines, you might want to read -
PROGRESS ON DUAL LASER EXPERIMENTS
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Hagelsteinprogresson.pdf
EXCERPT:
We have continued our experiments using duel laser stimulation of
electrochemically loaded PdDx. In earlier work, we used two properly
oriented and
401 - 500 of 560 matches
Mail list logo
