You have good arguments.
anyway, using the grid, or local grid, to average the production capacity,
might be interesting.
because most of the cost of e-cat/hyperion is not in fuel, or even
refueling, but in building the plant.
so reducing the total capacity, will reduce the cost.
anyway the grid
this is a scam.
this is totally impossible to have superconduction at high temperature.
no cooper pair can survive at that temperature.
I'm sure the scientist that make those experiments either make mistakes or
fraud.
we should look at the video of their experiment.
their ampmeter are tricked.
since we don't know the theory of operation of the reactor,
and especially because the absence of gamma in nuclear reaction seems
strange,
we cannot rule out some change of regime, especially when temperature get
abnormal...
eg: if you play with U235 in big pots, sometimes, given enough quantity
there are interesting theoretical arguments.
If they are right it means that all Ni+H experiments are fraud, not only
e-cat and hyperions.
this is an all or nothing argument, for NiH reactions.
about their (seems good) stellar argument, that nickel cannot transmute to
copper in star for
I agree that green energy policy (ang green everything) will be a big
source of trouble for LENR generators.
those regulation are not rational, nor efficient, by design (they are
subsidies, and dogmatic).
LENR, as it looks, is simply efficient.
as I've already discuss with you, I know an old
About the risk of big black hole,
the CERN have accepted to start the LHC, not only because current theory
say that small black hole will evaporate quickly (they don't take risk
based on, even consensual, theory),
but because Auger observatory have shown that we receive daily huge cosmic
particle
just about the shielding,
what about the chamber itself as shielding (what material/thickness?) for
some kind of emissions.
at least it should stop alpha and beta, protons, weak X, and reduce X, and
maybe soft gamma.
2011/12/5 Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com
According to Nelson's slides, the
not so false.
according to Rossi's E-cat figures, it would consume 25% of annual Ni
production to produce the annual energy.
in my opinion, according to defkalion info, the powder seems simple.
the reactor and the H bottle seems the most expensive
nb: assuming it works, as told.
2011/12/5 Peter
sorry, I mismatch between french million/milliards/billion/billiard,
and the US million/billion/trillion/quadrillion
best is SI prefix kMGTPE/mµnpfa, or Scientific notation
I mean many Gyears (4Gy for earth AFAIK)
about difference between LHC vs Corsmis Rays, an imperfect collision
millions of
from your experience,
what are the relative merit/domain of
- piston/rotative steam engine (like the one people talk here)
- steam/gaz turbine (with water or volatile fluids)
- Stirling engine
assuming the temperature proposed by Hyperion small and medium, working
alone or in farm like e-cat
Lying is one thing, but the subject is also important...
I won't be surprised if, during industrialization, rossi said that it
works, while he had a big problem...
that is common in business. We call that the demo effect...
the method to detect liars is not only to detect the uncontrollable first
Is it in that experiment that the core take 40minutes to cool down?
in that case, if really disconnected from electricity, and still hot for 4
hours it is a proof that something else produce heat?
correct me.
2011/12/3 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
In the Oct. 6 test, which is the one in
It's true that the QP and GR are incompatible at planck scale , and that is
the subject of quantum gravity research.
however about galaxy, dark matter and dark energy, seems more and more able
to explain the facts (better that modified gravity, according to recent
research). It raise chalenge in
I've look a gain, and I'm still suspect about using ZPE, because ZPE is
only an energy that you cannot use to go below... by definition.
note that about the law I talk about, GR, QP, TD1/2, I'm just very very
suspect about theory that assume a violation of that laws...
I know that in some
after defkalion who say they will install a webcam to show
an hyperion working
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=587
it seems that rossi agree too for a 24x7 show
http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/12/rossi-open-to-live-streaming-video-of-his-e-cat-technology/
Note to MY : I
the world is small,
good luck. clearly such a device with NiH CA-LENR reactor, priced a bit
more realisticaly (WhisperGen is priced around 15KEur 8-o , but maybe
expensive gas impose overdesign),
can catch the market.
2011/12/2 Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com
My dad and the kid next
I've seen a forum question to Areva on their forum, askin if they have
research on LENR
It's written in french,
http://www.areva.com/ajaxpub/Dialog/DetailQuestion.aspx?show=3idQuestion=975
Someone ask also them their opinion on E-cat and hyperion, and alerting if
they have legal data about fraud.
this kind of cost analysis is on the good path.
however the price are not yet stable. already rossi say's thate the cost of
thermal W is reduced from 2k$ to 500$, and to be honnest like software or
drugs, the cost is research, not building. thus it can get down with
volume. Rossi talk about
The government in US does not exist. it is a puppet of business, and this
is a concept that in Europe we had to learn to fight. But it is hard to
import.
US Government is a vehicle to make business run nicely.
In europe a big change is in process, but not event to the quite coherent
system of US.
Rossi talk about it...
He says he uses five nine, thus 99.999% pure.
Defkalion seems more tolerant.
Globally they seems to behave like engineer like me...
From the problems they take into account, I can guess not only they make
the machine work,
but they expect it to be maintained, abused,
/advice welcome
2011/11/25 Alain dit le Cycliste alain.sep...@gmail.com
FYI i've found this FAQ
http://faq.ecat.com/113090/i-was-wondering-if-you-may-inform-us-as-to-the-amount-of-hydrogen-that-will-be-required-to-run-an-ecatfor/
say that for 24h the 10kW e-cat use 0.2g of H...
it is hard
maybe is it still legal to build a similar reactor, with a pattented, or in
process of patent, technology,
but you have to obtain the allowance of the inventor/owner... and not steal
it.
normally rossi before applying for patent, should have put a document in a
third-party file, that proove that
what is more sensible for me is that in the article they pretend that
the e-cat cannot be stable for more of 24hour because of the design that
create hot-sport in the middle(explanation is credible)...
the second most sensible point is that they pretend to have solved the
problem,
meaning that it
the need to merge the patent like it has been for plane seems reasonable.
the notion of taxing cold fusion is classic for IP or any business. Windows
is a tax on PC...
state or private is a polemic detail.
the CF inventors could merge their patents to accelerate the developpement
of
not so sure.
Lithium batteries, (except the LiFePO4, that are an interesting product)
are known to burn or explose if badly build or badly treated (chargeed or
discharger roughly).
this is hy normally (except in some chinese fraudes copy) there are safety
Mosfet that limit discharge deepness and
LENR are not well understood. it seems they happens, but the by product are
not sure, and the theories are not proved.
It is as presumptuous as to say that any kind of fusion produce neutron,
gamma, and so-on,
as presumptuous as to pretend that any current circulating produce heating
, or any
OT :
the LiFePO4 battery don't have that problem.
they can sustain hard charge or discharge, support fire or explosion,
staying as flegmatic like an english man.
they have a slightly lower massic capacity, but not so much after some real
use.
I don't understand why they are not so common... maybe
experience of small companies owning patents, or small inventors owning
patents,
is that big corps usually find a way to get around, especially when
collaborating with the inventor before.
(It is why the inventor of smartcard get out of France, feeling abused by
his big partner)
I'm sure that
by the way, we observe the situation from far away, without
good legal tools.
abour Rossi's company, Defkalion and so on, the only reasonable possibility
of scam, is that Defkalion is a fake company, partner of the scam,
the secret client(s) too...
does anybody have access to the legal registrar
Rossi's behavior is quite coeherent with a soft-paranoid version.
Scam is not defendable.
let's imagine the option.
MY say, there are no clients, or fake client (actor, friend of scam).
if no client, no cash from clients. (as say MV here)
where from ? from investors ?
no public share sales...
a better analysis...
2011/11/24 Alain dit le Cycliste alain.sep...@gmail.com
so two article of the same FAQ are not coherent.
http://faq.ecat.com/112273/how-much-ni-is-in-the-cell/
http://faq.ecat.com/112449/how-much-nickel-and-hydrogen-will-it-take-to-generate-one-megawatt-of-heat-continuously
the critics could look ok when anomaly was around 20W and below % with old
instruments.
maybe even critics could not sustain honest check (accusing a chemist of
failing heat computation, is like accusing an accountant to break a
balance).
with reports, if they are honest, like the one about the
moreover Deuterium is known to be a killing contaminant of Ni-H cells...
maybe is it why the fuel have to be changed despite very few is used?
i'm curious to know why the Ni fuel have to be change every 6month, while
it is very little consumed?
it is cooked (crytal lattice modified by heat,
seems reasonable to fear that kind of problem.
could reduce/kill the diffusion of that technology to small home units ,
and globally increase the price.
the good point of price, is that it is not raw materials, but work, unlike
middle-east oil and alike.
the governance of that energy shall be
months) + 1g of hydrogen per ecat per day (in reality far less than this is
used, but there will be leakage etc).
On 23 November 2011 20:33, Alain dit le Cycliste
alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
that is not what rossi says on the FAQ.
he talks about 10mg/kW of H, and 100mg/kW of Ni
however
2011/11/24 Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
Not impossible, just unlikely, in the absence of good evidence.
I don't agree. SC was not understood, but the idea that quantum
transitions could be inhibited at low temperature was not contrary to any
calculations of reaction rates or
some peopl here imagin that rossi can be a scammer...
It does not seems credible, according tou his strange behavior itself.
if you try to profile him from his behavior, you find more a weak-paranoid
style persister in process com.
He does not behave like the usual weak-sociopath style promoter
just to cite data from the FAQ
http://faq.ecat.com/112273/how-much-ni-is-in-the-cell/
so the needed Ni is about 10mg/kW (with pg really consumed in 6 months)
the needed H is about ten times less 1mg/kW
note that CF according to the presented success, need a 1/1 loading ratio
(in atoms) between
that is not what rossi says on the FAQ.
he talks about 10mg/kW of H, and 100mg/kW of Ni
however, in my previeux computation I'me made a mistake...
1MW should need 10g of H
and 100g of Ni
if the number for Ni is Ok, but H is a bit exagerated,
for 100g of Ni you need 100g/59=1.7g hydrogen...
for those that repeat that CF is impossible , I can answer simply :
- it breaks no basic rule of todays most validated models : Quantum Physic
Reference Frame, and generel Relativity (unlike Opera neutrinos, perpetual
movement, usable antigravity). it only breaks usual approach to compute.
- it is
40 matches
Mail list logo
