Hi Mike,
Do you have a link to this paper please?
Thanks, joe
On 2 Feb 2014 at 02:38:08 am GMT, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
A new paper, by Mills and Lu, has been posted. It is quite technical and not
directly related to the performance of the SF-CIHT device, but is strongly
Ooooh! I've just ordered one! Thanks :).
Joe
On 27 Oct 2012, at 18:28, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Without the glove:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d6KuiuteIA
Available from leapmotion.com for less than $75 delivered (in early 2013).
Yes, that's true isn't it. The whole closing the loop discussion is predicated
on all types of energy being convertible, which is another statement of the
conservation of energy. The whole over unity issue is that either conservation
is broken in some circumstances, or that there are other
On 29 Dec 2011, at 14:17, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Having said all that, Stephen, please prove you exist.
That's a tough one.
Descartes's proof was defective, of course -- it proved only that I do not
see how I could not exist, not that I could not possibly not exist. Among
other
On 23 Dec 2011, at 03:13, Ron Kita wrote:
Greetings Vortex-L,
Dr Takaaki Musha, former electrogravitics researcher with Honda RD and now
with the MoD, Ministry of Defense- Japan has a Field Propulsion- Gravity
Shielding book:
http://www.benthamscience.com/ebooks/9781608052707/index.htm
On 29 Nov 2011, at 22:49, Horace Heffner wrote:
In 2007 I converted Jemimenko's theory into a full isomorphism between the
laws of electromagnetism and the laws of gravimagnetism. Creating this
isomorphism involves the use of the imaginary number i in gravimagnetic
terms, and thus the
On 30 Oct 2011, at 23:44, Man on Bridges wrote:
However the title Professor is to my knowledge not a protected title, so
anyone could use it.
Here in the UK at least, professor is a job title not a qualification.
Joe
On 24 Oct 2011, at 07:58, Harry Veeder wrote:
The witty remarks on 'bad science' are worth reading in this welcome
message to ICCF 17.
http://www.iccf17.org/sub01.php
(The message is an image file so I could not copy and past it)
Why on earth did they do that? I guess that they don't
On 19 Oct 2011, at 04:48, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
A new understanding of flux pinning is the most important relation in 100
years. The magnet floats on the superconductor. Apply an RF field of 10
mega hertz to a small disk and the magnet drops. That what I saw, so what
you say. Now
On 25 Sep 2011, at 05:31, Axil Axil wrote:
That is to say, neutrinos changing their flavor will go very fast (at warp
speed) for a very short period of time during flavor change then once flavor
change is complete, continue to move along indefinably at light speed.
Hi Axil,
I thought
On 23 Sep 2011, at 23:23, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint's message of Fri, 23 Sep 2011 01:07:14
-0700:
Hi,
[snip]
What are the ends of the dipole? Getting back to the above paragraph of
just what’s oscillating… and the aether being under tremendous
this bunch of loomies!
Oh, and that's loomies, as in, 'Luminaries'! :-)
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Dr Josef Karthauser [mailto:j...@tao.org.uk]
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:01 PM
To: mix...@bigpond.com
Cc: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Another advancement
On 23 Sep 2011, at 21:09, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
2011/9/23 Dr Josef Karthauser j...@tao.org.uk:
There's no other evidence for anything other than a 3+1 dimensional universe.
If this observation about neutrinos is true, then we do not have
anymore even 3+1 dimensions, but only three
On 23 Sep 2011, at 21:09, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
2011/9/23 Dr Josef Karthauser j...@tao.org.uk:
There's no other evidence for anything other than a 3+1 dimensional universe.
If this observation about neutrinos is true, then we do not have
anymore even 3+1 dimensions, but only three
On 23 Sep 2011, at 20:46, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On 11-09-23 03:30 PM, Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
From first principles if one starts with the notion that everyone should see
light as travelling at the same speed, then a simple derivation naturally
leads to the Lorenz contraction
On 23 Sep 2011, at 00:55, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint wrote:
My understanding of that postulate of relativity was “nothing with mass”
could attain or exceed C. Because, as the speed of the object approaches C,
inertial mass approaches infinity, attaining infinity when v=C, and infinite
mass is
On 23 Sep 2011, at 15:30, Terry Blanton wrote:
Don't bury Einstein yet:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
Sher also mentions a third option: that the measurement is correct.
Some theories posit that there are extra,
WTF! I really makes me sad that there are people trying to rip people off in
this way. :(. No idea where they got my email address from.
Joe
Begin forwarded message:
From: Maurice Brown maurice_br...@aol.com
Subject: The Easiest 100% FREE Electricity...Build It In Less Than An Hour!
Date: 1
On 6 Jun 2011, at 20:39, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
But that has not been true at all and will not be true in the
future, because next demonstration will be 20.6. where Defkalion will
show E-Cat for Greek government . . .
I assume you mean June 20, 2011.
(Date formats
On 3 Jun 2011, at 13:43, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
From Jed:
That is WEIRD. What is the point of airing it? Did BLP pay for it?
I would speculate that BLP did indeed pay for the commercial. I have no
proof of that however. Who else would pay for it, and for what purpose
On 3 Jun 2011, at 23:01, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I thought OCR would make a more compact file, but apparently not.
This is an OCR layer added underneath an image file. The image file is
intact, so the whole thing is bigger.
This is a messy way to
On 3 Jun 2011, at 19:55, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:40 AM, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
You make a valid point. Perhaps it came from a Communication Art's
student completing a final class assignment on assembling a commercial
for a
Ok, I'm game. What is a Casimir Cavity? I'm sure it's been explained here
already, but probably in the middle of one of the amply populated threads. I
know the smallest part the theory of the Casimir effect. Is this related? Is
there a paper with a worked through example on Casimir Cavities
I went to an Italian restaurant last week. We had some food left, which we
asked to take home with us, but instead they gave us one of Rossi's reactors
(http://twitpic.com/4e8apc). Exciting times. Can't wait for them to turn up in
the bottom of cereal packets! :)
Joe
On 23 Mar 2011, at 17:29, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
Sterling Allan, researcher and founder of Peswiki.com will be joined by
Andrea Rossi (Inventor of The Energy Catalyzer) tonight on Coast To Coast AM
with George Noory. Among other promising energy technologies Sterling will be
discussing
On 23 Mar 2011, at 18:06, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Dr Josef Karthauser wrote:
Shame he's being bundled with David Icke. :(.
I have never heard of him. I just looked him up and found this asinine
comment about Fukushima:
[cut]
I gather he also believes that reptilian humanoids
On 16 Mar 2011, at 01:37, Harry Veeder wrote:
Pi day threatened by Tau protestors
http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/interviews/index.html?story=%2Fent%2Ftv%2Ffeature%2F2011%2F03%2F14%2Fnational_pi_day_viral_videos
http://tinyurl.com/4pecdjl
Includes a fast talking defence of tau
On 14 Mar 2011, at 16:42, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 07:10 AM 3/14/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
3.14
Thought we needed a smile.
This afternoon you have a second chance for:
3/14 1:59:26
Myself, I'm waiting for Tau day :)
http://tauday.com/
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Robin van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 April 2008 03:13
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stupid Academic stunt
In reply to Dr Josef Karthauser's message of Fri, 4 Apr 2008 18:12:51
+0100:
Hi Joe,
[snip]
I'm a
-Original Message-
From: Standing Bear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 April 2008 05:58
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Stupid Academic stunt
Like to see Randall Mills' black light rocket as a real space
propulsion
enabler, but have a feeling that behind the
30 matches
Mail list logo
