David:
I typically enjoy your posts but I find the “Global Warming Hoax” material
utterly ridiculous. It is being driven by strong nonscientific motives.
Please examine your motives for embracing it.
Then answer this question, “If there is even a minimal chance that WE
(humanity)
great
hopes for Rossi, but until we have proof I remain a bit skeptical. My thermal
models suggest that what he says is true provided his fuel actually delivers
the required watts per kilogram for an extended time period.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ransom Wuller
David:
You said: “No one should assume that the guys making the global climate
computer models are great experts, which is what is happening at the world's
peril.”
What PERIL?
Ransom
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 2:58 PM
deniers
but I instead suggest that you may be under the influence of those that would
take away your civil rights using scare tactics. Please take the time to study
the issue before you pass judgement on my beliefs.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Ransom Wuller < <mailt
Serious, explosive document? Too who? Too the few souls in the world who
follow this?
Replications will need to come from multiple sources before they are
considered significant in any overall evaluation, but any positive
replication is in essence positive.
Further, so far I haven't seen any
Blaze:
That’s a good question. The license was only good for three years (based on a
leaked example) and it relied on products being available for sale, otherwise
it had no value. If IH had no plans for production during the remaining window
(1 year or so), the license would have been
Precisely, so if there are no products to sell, the sales quota is not met and
the license expires. The licensee is left with nothing. So either sue for
misrepresentation on the basis that the agreement assumed a product would be
available for sale, try to negotiate an extension (assuming
Jed:
The problem is the issue is NOT scientific. The issue is actually rather
simple at this point. Is a very juvenile fraud being perpetrated or not. The
latest test leaves little to talk about scientifically (notwithstanding the
issue associated with the alumina) making the issue of
Wait a minute, is everyone suggesting that all the ash was NI62. Where is
that coming from?
Only 10% of the ash was even sent as a sample for testing and then I think
only certain particles of the ash were tested for isotopic composition.
Other than to say that some of the nickel was in a
I suppose it doesn't really matter, but he was talking about the 1Mw plant
supposedly in operation at a customer of Industrial Heat, not the 3rd
Party Report.
Gasp..He is loosing me!
Courtesy Alain Coetmeur:
What does anyone make of this Paper?
http://www.benthamscience.com/open/topcj/articles/V005/17TOPCJ.pdf
Maybe it was already discussed.
Cude:
Why do you bother to respond when you post replies like that.
The result of the paper is different than the paper? Come now, the result
of the paper is a component of the paper, as a component, if it advances
knowledge, then the whole advances knowledge. Didn't you take logic in
your
I loved Carl Sagan but the biggest mistake he made in his lifetime was
making that phrase popular. A claim requires evidence, it doesn't matter
what kind of claim.
If what you are saying is science can't consider the possibility of
something extraordinary unless they are clobbered over the head
How do you know I'm not one of those rich guys. Sorry, stupidity isn't
confined to class groups. When the pie shrinks we all lose, when the pie
increases we all gain. The silly policies that have taken over
conservative thinking are not designed to promote prosperity and that's
all I care
Jed:
The leap too far point is incorrect. That had little to do with the
shuttle's issues.
The main problem was that it was designed to be everything. A truck, a
car, a lab all rolled into one. You wouldn't design a passenger carrier
and add a large truck carrier to it. It makes both
I am just suggesting that commercialization of the ecat will require more
then Leonardo Corp or Rossi. If Rossi is really developing a commercial
product he will need Partners and the structure of that relationship would
have been the first order of business after October. So it would not
Jed:
LENR does not require neutrons and he claims they will not be able to
demonstrate LENR not Cold Fusion. He must be talking to Krivit.
Ransom
I predict that Dick Smith will find an expert who will say: there are
no
neutrons, so there is no fusion. That will be the last we hear from
I think the assumption must be that Rossi has a device which will work,
otherwise there is not much point in this speculation.
If Rossi's device works, I think he will get his patent if the application
is properly written and complies with the application requirements.
However, that doesn't mean
Well, maybe the scam doesn't work anything like your speculation.
Listen, that interview was a huge waste of my time. This Bryce guy knows
far less about any of this then anyone following this on the Vortex.
Maryyugo could have done a much better job then Bryce discussing why not
to invest or
Exactly, you have no proof. What you have is the same thing Rossi has,
Rossi says, Smith says, Shaun says
I didn't hear half of the nonsense you are posting in that interview with
Bryce, who by the way seems as clueless to me as a lot of the Rossi
followers just on the other side of the nut
I wouldn't characterize MY as troll either, but annoyingly repetative and
of no value whatsoever to this site, absolutely. I don't care that you
think Rossi is a fake, I would prefer this site be restricted to technical
discussions of the science and even technical discussions of the evidence
So some things are impossible? You should keep an open mind. It doesn't
violate any principles of physics for a mist of micrometer droplets to
travel through a hose, and it is far more plausible than radiationless
nuclear reactions producing heat.
Joshua:
Considering this mist after
That calculation also requires an assumption that the steam that escapes
at
the end of the hose is dry. That is highly unlikely. If in fact, a fine
mist or fog was entrained in that steam, to explain the disappearance of
water, very little gain is established.
Sure, but the output after
23 matches
Mail list logo
