In reply to Jonathan Berry's message of Sat, 25 Apr 2020 17:40:28 +1200:
Hi,
[snip]
>This needs public pressure behind it!
>
>Makes a LOT more sense than shutting everything down, might take a little
>while to ramp up production but this should be top priority!
>
>Please, pass this on to people!
Hi,
Since the virus doesn't like oxidants, another possible remedy may be the very
old remedy of sulphur tablets.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:29:04 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
> I like it.
>Now imagine all that future you envision having been precision orchestrated in
>the year 2020 by an AI which few humans knew about...
I don't think it was an AI. More like the Illuminati. ;)
Reg
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:38:07 -0400:
Hi,
For paper masks, one could probably also use Ozone or Chlorine gas. That way,
thousands could be done in a few minutes
in a batch process.
>The University of Nebraska Medical Center is sterilizing their N95 masks
>with
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Thu, 16 Apr 2020 07:51:04 -0700:
Hi,
Bio-"weapons" are just a complicated way of committing suicide. The sooner all
nations wake up to this the better.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:12:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Our live is covered/maintained by faint fluctuations on top of highly
>stable matter that does not feel time at all.
I think supernovas would imply otherwise. I think what you are trying to say is
that nuclear
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:18:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Te best atomic clocks are sensitive to 10cm difference in altitude.
>
>But there is one open point: Is only the Rb/Cs crystal oscillating a bit
>slower/faster or is the electronics measuring slower/faster - or b
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:59:14 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Your logic is one way correct.
>
>If you take the path length L given by c covered by one second, then
>this is just one out of infinite many possible gauges.
>A frequency is just the breakdown of L in units of
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2020 00:26:55 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
[snip]
>Time is just the measurement interval or the
>frequency what ever you like more.
How can you speak of interval or frequency without time? Once time itself
exists, you can have an interval of time. You
ar
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 5 Apr 2020 12:53:57 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Bill Gates' noble effort:
>
>https://www.businessinsider.com/bill-gates-factories-7-different-vaccines-to-fight-coronavirus-2020-4
I wonder if a cocktail of all 7 would be reasonable?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandon
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 4 Apr 2020 19:46:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>5000 nm is pretty small. How many SARS-CoV-2 Virions will fit in one
>aerosol particle?
The only reference I could find for the size of the virus is 0.1 micron. So
assuming that both measures (i.e. 0.1 & 5)
refer
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sat, 4 Apr 2020 18:35:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I found an old Hoover HEPA vacuum bag and thought to make a mask. Then I
>Googled the idea. Nothing new under the sun. HEPA spec is 300 nm but test
>show them effective down to 50 nm (depends on the rating). SAR
In reply to H LV's message of Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:48:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>UMass Tries Innovative Method To Clean N95 Masks: UV Light
>March 27, 2020
>https://www.wbur.org/commonhealth/2020/03/27/umass-memorial-disinfects-masks-ultraviolet-light
Just wash them in bleach.
Regards,
Robin van Spaa
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 11 Mar 2020 20:22:49 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>The interesting dynamic is this: why does a few degrees of extra heat in
>springtime kill the virus? Say, maybe there is an additional irony to "global
>warming"?
Perhaps in the warmer months people's immune
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:44:46 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>$2.4T World GDP loss? Hah! The stockmarket lost $6T last week alone.
BTW stock market losses don't really count, because there is a winner for every
loser. The net impact is small. GDP
losses OTOH imply a loss o
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:44:46 -0500:
Hi,
It will be much more than that. If no cure/vaccine is found then about 250
million will die World wide. (worst case).
>$2.4T World GDP loss? Hah! The stockmarket lost $6T last week alone.
>
>https://markets.businessins
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sun, 1 Mar 2020 17:25:15 + (UTC):
Hi Frank,
[snip]
>I put in a ventless heater that does not require electric power.
What does it burn?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sat, 29 Feb 2020 20:33:43 + (UTC):
Hi,
>The mathematics of my model came before I had the words to describe it. Out
>of the model came this mega-hertz meter relationship. Someone on vortex told
>me that megahertz-meter was a velocity. With that I f
In reply to Blaze Spinnaker's message of Thu, 27 Feb 2020 15:37:26 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
https://stationfy.imgix.net/cm/5e5808bfe3daa3000772bb7c.jpg?w=570&fit=fillmax
This looks like only the outside of the bundle gets disinfected.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:58:45 -0500:
Hi,
>*All schools in Japan told to close until April over virus outbreak*
>
>https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/02/27/national/hokkaido-coronavirus-school/#.XlfJtmhKg2w
>
[snip]
First they take a stringent measure, then i
In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:47:22 -0500:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
>Ideally the choice should be the product of investigation and (conscious)
>deliberation rather than just be driven by perception.
I agree.
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 26 Feb 2020 15:24:06 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 3:08 PM wrote:
>
>> In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:57:52 -0500:
>> Hi Harry,
>> [snip]
>> A frame of reference is exactly that. It's a mathematical construct.
>> Choose any frame
In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:57:52 -0500:
Hi Harry,
[snip]
A frame of reference is exactly that. It's a mathematical construct. Choose any
frame you like, and stick to it, and the
math will all work out.
Difficulties only arise when we, sometimes sub-consciously, change our f
In reply to H LV's message of Wed, 26 Feb 2020 14:21:20 -0500:
Hi Harry,
>In Galilean relativity if I walk eastward towards a tree with uniform
>velocity this is equivalent to saying the tree is moving westward towards
>me with the same uniform velocity. As a fundamental proposition of modern
>phy
In reply to Jonathan Berry's message of Sat, 15 Feb 2020 10:31:40 +1300:
Hi,
[snip]
>To have any idea about how the number of infected and dead compare to
>the lethality of this Virus we need to know two things.
>The mean time it takes someone to die from the virus after it is
>recognized they hav
Hi,
Creating a bio-weapon is like designing a gun to backfire.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:46:17 + (UTC):
PS - They also mention that Canada & Alaska report little or no sea level rise.
Perhaps this is because of loss of ice
cover pressure on land causing the land to rise.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = t
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:46:17 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>Why do many tidal gauges show almost zero sea level rise over the past 40
>years and almost none of them match the satellite data?
>This is from the NextBigFuture and is a hated topic among many climate expert
Hi,
Apparently it's susceptible to oxidants. Sodium chlorite is an oxidant.
There was an article called "MIRACLE MINERAL SUPPLEMENT: AN INTEGRATED THERAPY"
in NEXUS vol. 16, no. 4 (June-July 2009)
on medicinal use of Sodium Chlorite. Maybe an "out of the box" treatment that
requires no research,
Hi Frank,
If you can think of any experiments that would either confirm or refute your
theories, then you know what you could use
funding for.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Jonathan Berry's message of Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:18:50 +1300:
Hi,
[snip]
>https://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/en/news-page/news-nation/coronavirus-in-china-20-million-quarantined-2-8-million-infected-112-000-dead
>
>Maybe people are dying because there is no food, no trucks allowed
In reply to Jonathan Berry's message of Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:44:04 +1300:
Hi,
Note that when deriving the mortality rate, one needs to take into account the
time it takes an average victim to die.
E.g. if that is 2 weeks, then the deaths now need to be compared with the
number of people that wer
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 9 Feb 2020 11:59:17 -0500:
Hi,
The COP however still leaves a little to be desired. I don't think they can use
this for electricity generation just
yet. As an efficient heat source, yes.
>On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
>>
>> ...
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:08:24 + (UTC):
Hi,
[snip]
>https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2020/01/densest-object-on-earth-made-from-compressed-copper.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fadvancednano+%28nextbigfuture%29
[snip]
This
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 13 Jan 2020 20:37:25
+:
Hi,
I suspect that only the angular momentum of photons is quantized.
Allowed atomic transitions can be found by making that assumption, without
applying any other rules, i.e. Occam's razor.
[snip]
>Comment:
>
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 1 Jan 2020 03:51:42
+:
Hi Bob,
Nemo explained that the power came from splitting water & recombining the
gasses IIRC.
Normally that would be considered impossible, however if a Mills type reaction
occurs, with water molecules as the c
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:51:58
+:
Hi Bob,
Minor difference here is that Verne obtained the energy from water, whereas in
your case it comes from Uranium. ;)
Obtaining energy from water could mean either some form of dense hydrogen or
fusion or
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 03:23:03 +, "bobcook39...@hotmail.com"
wrote:
Hi Bob,
What first hand experience are you referring to?
>Jones
>
>Jules Verne was science fiction in the 1800s. I know first hand that it was
>NOT science fiction.
>
>Bob Cook
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
loca
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 28 Dec 2019 22:53:00 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
Thanks. It seems they are well ahead of me on this one! :)
[snip]
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 28 Dec 2019 20:22:55
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>Jones
>
>If dense H has accumulated on Earth as you suggest, it may sink deeper into
>the crust and Mantle where the conditions are ripe for LENR to happeni.e.,
>geothermal heating.
Dense hydroge
Hi,
Coeliac disease is caused by the body's own immune system attacking other wise
healthy cells in the gut due to the presence of a protein called gluten.
I wonder if an analogous method could be employed to get the immune system to
attack cancer cells?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asy
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 15 Dec 2019 12:58:21 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>A LENR reaction producing 4-He (alpha) from D*-D* does not emit kinetic
>alphas as there is no momentum available. All nuclear magnetic flux is
>symmetric!
>Only in a case where e.g. 3-He 3-H would be produced
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 14 Dec 2019 23:42:37
+:
Hi,
Another variation on this theme might be to allow the alphas to strip electrons
off other atoms, then let the electrons radiate in the field as they return to
the positive ions.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 14 Dec 2019 23:42:37
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>Robin and Jones
>
>One thing I noticed is that the Nano -sized MG particles are made (a least in
>part) by ion deposition. I can envision a Ni-H base or a Pd base or merely a
>Ni base particle wi
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:26:04 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
> Bob,
>Yes glassy iron is cheaper and Glassimetal, Inc also has an iron based product
>on their site, presumably available now. The glassy iron could possibly
>catalyze H2 to dense hydrogen more efficie
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:59:57 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Standard tensor calculous will not work for a general EM-mass solution
>in SO(4) as the action is circular. Quaternions works for a subclass of
>the problems namely the Clifford torus based core flux. But the
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 24 Oct 2019 23:31:25 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
1) Do you have nucleus-nucleus distance for H*-H*?
2) What does "for D*-D* up two 2002keV" mean? Is it a typo?
[snip]
>We know that the formation of H*-H* releases 496eV and for D*-D* up two
>2002keV But there ar
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Tue, 1 Oct 2019 12:37:50
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>In this regard I am not able to identify aay closed systemsnone seem to exist
>in the known universe. They are only a virtual construct like quarks IMHO.
[snip]
There may not be any truly closed system
rooly!
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Fri, 6 Sep 2019 03:17:16 + (UTC):
Hi Frank,
You may also find https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ground_wave_propagation of some
use.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Fri, 6 Sep 2019 03:17:16 + (UTC):
Hi Frank,
[snip]
Since I know next to nothing about radio, take these comments with lots of salt.
:)
1) If some signals are horizontally polarized, and some vertically, then perhaps
you could try creating an antenna t
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 6 Sep 2019 00:49:53 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Randy Mills will face the same, if he cannot manage to enhance his
>reaction with a second LENR step.
>J.W.
I've been trying to tell him that for years, but he won't have a bar of it.
Regards,
Robin van Spaan
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:58:02 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The answer is simple
>
>q^2 --> rm. Charge square is proportional to rotating mass. In a proton
>much more mass is needed to produce the same charge. Ergo adding an
>electron can do nothing...
>
>J.W.
Given tha
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:36:57 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
>nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
>function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
>gen
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:59:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>First a small theoretical update.
>
>A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
>with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
>structure. In SO(4) we have a 5 ro
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>PS: And please forget the matter anti matter story. It is childish old
>physics thinking. Why e.g. can a nucleus expel antimatter
>(positron...) Annihilation is only one option when e- e+ meet.
Perhaps un
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Some years ago people feared that CERN might produce black holes...
>
>the imagination of such things is deep old children instinct driven
>behavior that outplays the brain.
No, it's just caution, which is wise
Hi,
Suppose that an anti-proton annihilates a proton. If any of the resultant
particles have a negative charge, and are capable of converting another proton
into an anti-proton, then in dense matter, the result may be chain reaction that
ends up converting all matter into gamma rays.
Perhaps this
Hi,
Rossi seems to think the Compton wavelength of the electron is important, and
Proton21 uses 600 keV electrons.
Perhaps 511 keV is the minimal energy needed by an electron to convert a proton
into an anti-proton (pair -production??).
If so then the theoretical maximum energy gain per reaction
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:50:10 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The value ?
think Sudbury basin with gold plating ...
>
Yup, and that's not all. There's a chance that large meteorites create cracks in
the crust that allow deep oil/gas to reach up to near the surface. Think "Gul
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 17 Aug 2019 23:14:46
+:
Hi Bob,
No, I was just wondering where you expelled electron came from?
>Robin
>
>You may be correct: However the x-rays associated with replacement of the
>captured electron have not been reported for Pd system
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 17 Aug 2019 18:12:14
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>First a pairing of H isotopes in a tight spin 0 Cooper pair- like entity
>(still part of the coherent system) and second an change of a proton to a
>neutron with expulsion of an electron.
A neutron ma
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:28:57 -0700:
Hi Jones,
In an early post on vortex - decades ago, I proposed that the reversion of a
superconducting state to normal, would result in a very fast magnetic field
collapse, which due to V = - L di/dt could produce a local high v
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 4 Aug 2019 13:52:03 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Unluckily there are some exceptions with Cu/W and there may be more.
>
>J.W.
It's not clear whether you mean Cu/W is the input to the reaction, or the output
from the reaction.
Could you provide an example?
Rega
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Adding H* to any useful isotope would result in a much better energy
>gain in the range of 1..8 MeV at best. Adding H* is neutron like and
>not always harmless...
I would have thought that adding H* would only
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 3 Aug 2019 19:00:53 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>I would roughly estimate that about 10^5 105Pd disappear for 3kW/s.
Is "3kW/s" a typo, and if not, then what do you mean by it?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:05:31 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>This is according to my older version of his theory which may have changed.
>Hydrogen ions (bare protons) also qualify as self-catalytic but they are
>usually too reactive.
Bare protons can't catalyze anything, bec
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:52:00
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
Have you found any evidence that gamma ray emitters don't emit gamma rays when
the nucleus emitting the gamma ray is incoporated in a semi-conductor crystal?
Note that absorbtion of external gamma
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sun, 28 Jul 2019 18:46:39
+:
Hi Bob,
Your answers don't appear to have appeared. ;)
>Robin
>
>You raised the following questions and comments:
>
>
>
>1) What is this "coherent system", and specifically, in what respect is it
>
>coherent, i.e
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:28:29
+:
Hi Bob,
[snip]
>Robin-
>
>
>
>During NMR isomeric transitions, nuclear species are stimulated with a radio
>frequency EM field to gain kinetic spin energy in the form of increased
>angular momentum in small quanta
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Wed, 24 Jul 2019 13:19:02
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>For example, spin energy transitions within a coupled coherent system may
>not entail any radiation at all, if there is a perfect conservation of angular
>momentum during the LENR event. Of course r
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Wed, 24 Jul 2019 14:15:44 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>K shells are not usually vacant, so such an electron would still upset
>things. Regards,
>
>You miss the point! If you increase the nuclear charge by +2 then
>exactly 2 k-shell electrons are missing!
True, I d
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sun, 21 Jul 2019 18:39:48 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Bob
>
>One reason why the D* path is working like adding +2p/2e could be that
>the internal electron from the neutron only needs to do a little push to
>get to the k-shell. Thus no need to emit an electron!
K
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 23 Jul 2019 16:39:57 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>If a nuclear reaction (fusion) was responsible for the transmutation,
>wouldn't gamma radiation be produced?
Not necessarily as much as you might expect. It depends on the actual reaction.
If there are particles avail
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 22 Jul 2019 00:41:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.jmcchina.org/html/2019/1/20190101.htm
>
>Replication of biologic transmutation using a chemical reaction.
>
>The productivity of the transmutation was a function of the ambient
>temperature of the solution.
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 20 Jul 2019 18:09:51 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Two simple samples:
>
>7-Li + H* --> 8Li --> 8-Be --> 2 4-He. (Lipinski reaction)
>
>105Pd +D* -->107Cd --> 107Ag classic P&F.
>
>You can identify the decay paths by the typical gammas emitted.
So which gammas a
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 19 Jul 2019 23:05:52 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>In nuclear transformation (LENR) D* adds like a double proton and H*
>adds like a neutron. That's what we see (exactly measure) from the gamma
>radiation signature of complex reactions.
Could you give a couple
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:14:19 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The energy release per atom would be useful, to narrow down the
>possibilities.
>
>Yes. No doubt this detail would be very useful to know, but is it even
>possible to know?
I think that with careful work, it is p
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:37:44 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>In the Hydrogen LENR (?) the H-H --> H*-H* condensation produces about
>500eV of magnetic potential energy due to SO(4) spin coupling of the
>perturbative proton mass. This can exactly be calculated.
If it c
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:08:50 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>So fusion only occurs infrequently. But why then is there NEVER any
>neutrons detected? Why are the the transmutation produces ALWAYS stable?
1) There are occasionally a few neutrons detected. Try searching for neutro
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:28:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Well that is simple. If fusion was was a viable ongoing process during the
>LENR reaction, then there should be lots of gamma rays and neutrons
>produced, and LENR experimenters would all be dead in short order. But LE
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:10:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>The one undeniable aspect of this ferrosilicon transmutation example is the
>shear volume of unexplained material produced. In 11 weeks, an extra volume
>of 327.25 tons of "anomalous" ferrosilicon output was unaccount
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 16 Jul 2019 18:53:04 -0400:
Hi,
All the anecdotal stories I have heard to date report the engine running "cold",
sometimes "hand cold".
>One of the formats that energy production in the LENR reaction can assume
>is shock wave generation. The Papp engine pr
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 16 Jul 2019 19:49:22 -0400:
Hi Harry,
You are making the assumption that it actually has something to do with nuclear
structure. However it is by no means certain as of yet, that such is the case.
That's precisely why the energy release per atom would be useful,
In reply to H LV's message of Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:44:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>IMO the focus on mass-energy equivalence at the present time is not helpful
>in this field. It should be set aside until there is a rough explanation of
>the nuclear dynamics without it. Harry
[snip]
Calculation of the ener
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Mon, 8 Jul 2019 12:49:39 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Bob,
>
>For some reason despite the logic which you mention and the obvious problem
>with activation, NASA still believes that W&L got it right. Go figure.
[snip]
...that's probably because it's more palatable to th
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:58:27 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
>As shown in Table 1, he adjusted the gas during the 111 day run, to see the
>effects of pressure. He kept an inventory of gas to measure loading. But
>this could be kept constant in a future test. Plus you could
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 27 Jun 2019 17:08:27 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>> The best rationale for the belief that this design will not runaway is the
>> very low inventory of reactant and/or the fact that the gainful reaction is
>> not nuclear fusion.
>>
>Yes.
If the amount of gas in th
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Wed, 26 Jun 2019 15:05:38 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>Yes -- It is almost certain the magnitude of the effect he claims could not
>be so far wrong as to negate most of the strong anomalous thermal signal.
>
>But what about other kinds of testing? (non thermal)
>
>
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 25 Jun 2019 10:17:06 -0400:
Hi Jed,
If the heater is only consuming 50 W, why does it need to be a 500 W heater?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Chris Zell's message of Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:11:48 +:
Hi,
[snip]
>Could be. It may be like causes for war. The US starts militating against
>some nation and by sheer coincidence causes for immediate military action
>appear, as if by magic.
Nice to see that at least someone has
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:58:08 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>It is as I read somewhere, as long as there are several trillion dollars of
>oil untapped, cold fusion will remain "fringe science". When we need it,
>it will suddenly become accepted. Same with AG.
1) If we wai
In reply to Lennart Thornros's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2019 07:02:52 -0400:
Hi,
>If there is such a nonaggression pact. Shouldn't we the people 've
>informed? Why is that secret.? W go benefits from the secrecy?
>Lennart Thornros
[snip]
1) Yes, we should be informed.
2) It's secret because those in
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2019 10:53:01 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I think they are following still the guidance offered in the Brookings
>Report:
>
>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19640053196.pdf
At first glance, my impression is that like most people in p
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Fri, 21 Jun 2019 13:44:42 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
PS - The non-aggression pact guarantees that they are no danger to the navy.
They simply get out of the way. :)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 20 Jun 2019 22:55:29 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
1) The President doesn't believe they are extra-terrestrial, and also isn't
worried.
2) If they were "home grown" no senate briefing would have been needed.
Not worried implies they are already known not to be a threa
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Thu, 20 Jun 2019 13:02:01 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin,
>
>The separation distance of dense deuterium is about 2 picometers in Holmlids
>model
So, when you were talking about 2 nm, you were talking about the size of the
cluster as a whole then rather than the se
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Thu, 20 Jun 2019 07:00:24 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The strong force may become involved at this point to provide the binding
>energy in similar way that gluons bind quarks.
[snip]
2 nm = 20 Angstrom ~= 28 times the separation distance of the of the D nuclei
in a D
Hi,
Should separation distance between metals prove to be important, then a very
small separation between two metal sheets can be obtained by etching a honeycomb
pattern into fine gold leaf, and using it to separate the two target metal
sheets.
This could allow gas pressures as high as 17 atm. to
Hi,
Observation:-
When Hydrino formation energy is used to clone more Hydrinos of the same size,
the maximum energy gain is a factor of about 6. This is pretty close to what
Mizuno is getting.
I wonder if he tried Hydrogen vs. Deuterium, and if the result was different?
(BTW cloning depends on
1 - 100 of 3347 matches
Mail list logo
