On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Charles HOPE
wrote:
> Murray should apologize to Earthtech for making derogatory comments on
> Rossi's experiment that were quotes of Cude's criticism?
Not at all.
I am saying that Murray should have copied the following to EarthTech.
He left them without "the
Murray should apologize to Earthtech for making derogatory comments on
Rossi's experiment that were quotes of Cude's criticism?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> And that changes what I said how?
>
> T
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
> > Hello Terr
And that changes what I said how?
T
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Rich Murray wrote:
> Hello Terry,
>
> I'm still doubtful about the Rossi claims,
Hello Terry,
I'm still doubtful about the Rossi claims, due to the enormous
confusion about the output water-steam flows, and the weak claims
about gamma detection.
I am not a doctrinaire skeptic, but as a scientific layman serve as a
pragmatic skeptic about the simpler aspects of cold fusion res
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
> Independent evaluation of the commercial viability and utility of an
> invention like this is typically made, and could have been made in this
> case, by an independent third party, under a nondisclosure agreement (NDA)
> before commercia
On Feb 16, 2011, at 9:15 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from "22passi" blog interviewed again Andrea
Rossi on February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-
di.html
And this is an English translatio
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from "22passi" blog interviewed again Andrea Rossi on
February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-di.html
And this is an English translation courtesy of PESN, edited by Hank
Mills from a Google tr
7 matches
Mail list logo
