On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Charles HOPE
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote:
Murray should apologize to Earthtech for making derogatory comments on
Rossi's experiment that were quotes of Cude's criticism?
Not at all.
I am saying that Murray should have copied the following to EarthTech.
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from 22passi blog interviewed again Andrea Rossi on
February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-di.html
And this is an English translation courtesy of PESN, edited by Hank
Mills from a Google
On Feb 16, 2011, at 9:15 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini from 22passi blog interviewed again Andrea
Rossi on February 13th. This is the original link:
http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/02/energy-catalyzer-facciamo-un-po-
di.html
And this is an English translation
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
snip
Independent evaluation of the commercial viability and utility of an
invention like this is typically made, and could have been made in this
case, by an independent third party, under a nondisclosure agreement
Hello Terry,
I'm still doubtful about the Rossi claims, due to the enormous
confusion about the output water-steam flows, and the weak claims
about gamma detection.
I am not a doctrinaire skeptic, but as a scientific layman serve as a
pragmatic skeptic about the simpler aspects of cold fusion
And that changes what I said how?
T
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Terry,
I'm still doubtful about the Rossi claims,
Murray should apologize to Earthtech for making derogatory comments on
Rossi's experiment that were quotes of Cude's criticism?
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
And that changes what I said how?
T
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Rich Murray
7 matches
Mail list logo
