...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 5:23 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of value
to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate us
about some practical
Russ George wrote:
It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of
> value to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate
> us about some practical derivatives that might be revealed due to the
> findings.
>
You never know
There is an entire field of possible technological applications of GW. But
for GW to have practical applications they have to be at high frequency and
so not as the one discussed in the astrophysical context (these waves have
frequencies that range between few Hz to thousands of Hz). This is
o be congratulated if the detections continue to be
> confirmed. I remain weary of announcements that are produced so quickly.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Se
From: Giovanni Santostasi
Ø There is an entire field of possible technological applications of GW. But
for GW to have practical applications they have to be at high frequency…
Even at low frequency, it is too bad that there were no reports of simultaneous
energy bursts in ongoing LENR
ig claims again...I hope it is
>> true but it is unlikely.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
>> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>> Sent: Thu, Feb 11, 2016 9:28 p
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Feb 11, 2016 9:28 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
By the way, gravitational waves were the topic of my dissertation so feel free
to ask any question abo
Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 11:08 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
Here is the paper:
https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102
The detection statistics is 5.1 sigma, that corres
The paper of the event
https://dcc.ligo.org/public/0122/P150914/014/LIGO-P150914%3ADetection_of_GW150914.pdf
The event leaves no room for the GW was propagated other than c.
ce making big claims again...I hope it is
> true but it is unlikely.
>
> Dave
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Thu, Feb 11, 2016 9:28 pm
> Subject: Re: [V
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
Sounds impressive! Perhaps I was a bit too skeptic and am warming up to the
idea.
If a collision 1 billion plus light years away produces a 24 dB SNR, then it is
going to be amazing how clean a collision only 1 million LY's away
this issue?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 11:42 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
There was not much filtering going on because the signal was so evid
tances. Has
anyone address this issue?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 11:42 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
There was not much filtering going on b
gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 11:42 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
There was not much filtering going on because the signal was so evident, 24
SNR.
Other searches like looking for GW from rotating neutron stars try to dete
Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 11:42 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
>
> There was not much filtering going on because the signal was so evident,
> 24 SNR.
>
> Other searches like l
ct distance assumed? It
>> would seem that a two dimensional measuring platform would not be able to
>> accurately determine the distance once large distances are anticipated.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: Giovanni Santos
e far, far less sensitive or that there just
>> happened to be no collisions during the sample time at these distances.
>> Has anyone address this issue?
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Giovanni Santostasi <gsantost...@gmail.com>
Surfing the universe on gravity waves!
;vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Fri, Feb 12, 2016 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:LIGO Gravity Waves... So what?
The distance is not a free parameter. When you have 2 detectors waveforms you
can fix the masses of the black holes, spins, orbital plane, final mass of the
system, distance (of course with
maybe the best account and video of first LIGO gravity wave 2015.09.14: The
New Yorker: Rich Murray 2016.02.11
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2016/02/maybe-best-account-and-video-of-first.html
http://www.kurzweilai.net/we-have-detected-gravitational-waves-ligo-scientists
1:38:33 hour NSF event
Energy equivalent of three sun mass is dissipated as GW in 1/10 second and this
energy appears not well absorbed by the universe. This is interesting from
conservation of energy. If dissipation takes too much time there would be
always a GW background noise which correspond to a energy density.
It seems the announcement of showing gravity waves are real is only of value
to obscure academic discussions. Unless someone here might illuminate us
about some practical derivatives that might be revealed due to the findings.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
wrote:
By the way, gravitational waves were the topic of my dissertation so feel
> free to ask any question about the topic. It is very fascinating.
>
Given enough time, development and resources, will it be possible to
By the way, gravitational waves were the topic of my dissertation so feel
free to ask any question about the topic. It is very fascinating.
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
wrote:
> It opens a complete different window on the Universe.
> The analogy
It opens a complete different window on the Universe.
The analogy that is often given is imagine the cosmic show is like a TV
show. Until now we had video but not audio. Finally we turned the audio on.
Gravitational waves are a different but complementary way to observe the
universe.
We already
In another report I heard black hole collisions are thought to occur only
once in a million years.
Is that true?
Also how can they know for certain that this not a seismic event? After all
there is a great deal we do not know about the Earth's interior.
Harry
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:27 PM,
Like Russ George (see below), I see no connection between our CMNS field and
gravity waves.
Ludwik
=
On Feb 11, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
> It opens a complete different window on the Universe.
> The analogy that is often given is imagine the
27 matches
Mail list logo