Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
viahttp://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enctx=mailanswer=1311182
eskimo.com
11:45 AM (15 hours ago)
to vortex-l
Edmund Storms https://plus.google.com/u/0/112904824327993917962?prsrc=4
writes:
Yes, but all of these processes you describe are done
I don't understand your point. Laser stimulation has been done many
times and it simply adds energy to the process. Energy can be added by
increased temperature and application of applied current, which also
increases the power. This changes nothing basic about the process nor
reveals how
Kevin - I could not open that document, but it sounds similar to the
Letts/Cravens effect. Can you post the abstract?
The Letts/Cravens effect could end up being more important than anyone
realizes if the polariton is involved. Here is a Krivit interview with D.C.
on the general subject.
it seems not to work, but
http://repository.ias.ac.in/64627/
and public paper link
http://repository.ias.ac.in/64627/1/10-pub.pdf
works better
2013/2/10 Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com
Everyone seems to have an explanation of the laser effect. I think all
agree that the laser can stimulate energy states in the surface. What
these states do to initiate LENR is the big question.
Hagelstein proposes that the laser stimulates phonons that initiate a
fusion reaction in metal
*The basic questions are, Why does the laser effect work when the surface
is covered with gold so that the PdD was not actually exposed to the laser
and why does a single laser work sometimes and a duel laser is required at
other times?
*
If you want to understand LENR, you must understand how
. Laser stimulation has been done many times and it simply adds energy to
the process.
***That was my misconception as well. But when I talked to KP Sinha on the
phone, he assured me that the process he was involved in for exposing the
LENR environment to lasers was a way to REMOVE energy from
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
viahttp://support.google.com/mail/bin/answer.py?hl=enctx=mailanswer=1311182
eskimo.com
8:10 AM (5 hours ago)
to vortex-l
Kevin - I could not open that document, but it sounds similar to the
Letts/Cravens effect. Can you post the abstract?
I think the paper is
Eric,
It's good to hear Ron Maimon is trying to develop this theory.
But, the math is truly confusing, bewildering and intimidating -
even to formulate the problem, let alone solve it.
When composite particles are involved, calculating tunneling probability
is almost intractable - even in free
The problem Eric is that once the math is solved, the expected nuclear
reaction is hot fusion, not cold fusion. Consequently, this effort is
a waste of time. This is something the hot fusion field needs to
understand to explain the effect of bombarding materials with
energetic deuterons.
Ed,
I assume you are referring to Maimon's theory, which I am not familiar with.
When you say the expected reaction is hot fusion, are you only
referring to highly energetic collisions?
Do you think the theory X.Z.Li, et al, involving resonant tunneling
(at low kinetic energy), allegedly
Lou,
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how the resulting energy is
dissipated. Such energy is dissipated normally by the fusion product
breaking into two parts, which go off with high energy in directions
required
Experiments by Piantelli and information about early Rossi systems indicate
that a cold LENR system will produce high energy radiation, but a hot
system will not.
How can we understand the physical meaning of these experimental results?
It has been shown that coherent EMF in the form of
On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Experiments by Piantelli and information about early Rossi systems
indicate that a cold LENR system will produce high energy radiation,
but a hot system will not.
Alix, this statement does not describe the evidence. All we know is
what
*Yes, but all of these processes you describe are done near absolute zero
while using complex apparatus. This has no relationship to cold fusion.*
http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/02/bose-einstein-condensate-created-at-room-temperature/
From the article: Bose-Einstein condensate created at
*This description has no justification in theory or in observation.
Coherent motion of atoms does no occur spontaneously in a lattice.*
Here is where the size of the micro-particle becomes important.
A 5 micron particle will resonate coherently at a temperature of about 400C,
Nano particles
*If the coherent motion of the lattice is not robust enough, the radiation
produced by the nuclear reactions will be unmodified by the cold lattice
and escape as gamma rays.*
*I have no idea what you are describing by the above comment.*
In my post titled “Right Sizing Nickel Particles” I
Hi Ed,
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Any theory that proposes to use tunneling based on electrons being
concentrated must at the same time show how the resulting energy is
dissipated.
This appears to be different from what Ron Maimon is proposing.
This is coincidental to the BEC paper mentioned by Axil yesterday.
From: Peter Gluck
Can this:
Nanoscopic Microcavities Offer Newfound Control in Light
Filtering: Unique Nanostructure Produces Novel 'Plasmonic
Peter,
You may also be interested in the following paper on nanochannels -
CHANNELING, SUPERFOCUSING, AND NUCLEAR REACTIONS - Yu N. Demkov
http://144.206.159.178/FT/8304/558634/11919154.pdf
While it discusses the extreme focusing of ~1 MeV proton wave-functions,
perhaps particles/ions in
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:08 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
While it discusses the extreme focusing of ~1 MeV proton wave-functions,
perhaps particles/ions in micro-/nano-channels in zeolites,
nano-crevices, nanostructures, ..., experience more wave-function
focusing than expected -
21 matches
Mail list logo
