To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Garbage Collection of a Fool's Imagination
Orion,
Hopefully my comment is not understood as trolling
but as polite criticism.
It is nice to have imagination and to think about things that are considered
by main stream science as impossible. I
: Re: [Vo]:The Garbage Collection of a Fool's Imagination
There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark.
Thanks for clarification re Moon -- has a two-week night, while one
of its poles is always dark -- so surface temperatures get low
anyplace it's dark for over a day -- that's how it can hold plenty of
H2O as ice within the highly insulating dusk on the surface.
I saw a reference to a paper by an
Rick,
Thanks for your commentary.
BTW, you recently stated:
... I have been repeatedly denigrated as a pathological skeptic
-- despite a proven track record of submitting detailed, evidence and
reason based, critiques of CF claims since December, 1996, when I
evolved from being a naive
Analysis of the design using established physics predicts that it will
not exhibit pertual motion when it is built. It also goes without
saying that you can't expect to design a perpertuum mobile using
established physics. If the built device did exhibit perpertual
motion, then it would be by luck
Well, sure any celestial body in the solar system has one side that is hit
by sun light and the other that is not. But usually people talk about the
'dark side of the moon' as the side that is not visible of the moon and my
point was that is a misnomer. But yes there are regions of the moon that
Harry,
I agree with you. In the end one has to rely on experimentation. If one
builds a machine that works at over unity and this is verified all over the
world, on a regular basis, by many independent experimenter than no matter
what the theory says, this phenomenon should be accepted.
What I
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
I bet most scientists would be ecstatic if
one day somebody can produce reliable LENR supporting results (or any other
anomalous over unity energy experiment).
Excluding those whose livelihood depends on fusion
you are right scientist would love to search on LENR.
Some did it officially and got black listed by their administration and the
community afraid of the press reactions, thus of politicians and citizen
(furious of fund waste)
Some did is officiously and keep the results in drawaer
Some did it in
Hello Steven V. Johnson,
Wow ! I ended my post this morning at 10:58 AM with the phrase Woo
Woo Big Time, not knowing you would be using the phrase woo woo in
your fine effort to tactfully and playfully expand and deepen the
range of discourse here, and not knowing that 4 skeptics had been
Orion,
Hopefully my comment is not understood as trolling
but as polite criticism.
It is nice to have imagination and to think about things that are
considered by main stream science as impossible. I wish more professional
scientists could do that (some do and they wait until they come close
I found this on peswiki:
By the way, speaking of timing and synchronicity, as I was
workinghttp://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:_Hidro_--_Water_Pressures_Energy_Conversion_(WAPEC)#
on
this page, about to get on a plane coming back from the Next Gen
Expohttp://next-gen-expo.com/ in
Florida, Glen
Steven,
what's the difference between those 'viruses' and the MEMES postulated by
Richard Dawkins- see Memetics?
Peter
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.comwrote:
Orion,
Hopefully my comment is not understood as trolling
but as polite criticism.
It
The Hydro machine has masses moving in a closed path in a gravitational
field so the total energy balance is zero.
When you consider the motion of the gas in and out of the chambers, that
unavoidably will have some friction and losses, then the system is going to
have a negative energy balance.
Hi Giovanni Santostasi,
buoyant perpetual motion --
the ever effervescing fluctuations of the quantum space-time foam --
our universe bubble as an expanding geometic instability from a minute
quantum fluctuation --
floating? in something?
so the biggest thing we see is the smallest thing we
Rick,
There is not a dark side of the moon
it is misnomer. It should be called the non visible (from earth) side of
the moon. The sun shines on that side as it shines on any other part of the
moon. In fact it is the only lighted side when the moon is between the sun
and the earth for example.
There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark.
Yes, it is a misnomer, it is the side that is away from the earth and it is
never seen from the earth, but it receive exactly the same amount of light
than the other side does (over a full orbit of the moon around the earth).
The moon is locked tidally with the earth in such way that one orbit
18 matches
Mail list logo
