[Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Zachary Jones
On Mar 18, 2007, at 5:13 AM, R.C.Macaulay wrote: Last year we tested a high speed water vortex inducer that produced a near perfect cylinder shaped vortex. This shape differs from a parabolic tornado shape we are all familar with. The cylinder shape has an eyewall like a hurricane. This

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Terry Blanton
On 3/19/07, Dean McGowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I incorrect in assuming that a particle travelling at the speed of light has infinite mass ? There you go . . . trying to destroy everything that Richard Feynman did to earn his Nobel. Next, you'll be asking about the electron mass and it's

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Dean McGowan
'Nuff said :D Dean Original Message Follows From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:00:21 -0500 On 3/19/07, Dean McGowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I incorrect

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Dean McGowan
: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:00:21 -0500 On 3/19/07, Dean McGowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I incorrect in assuming that a particle travelling at the speed of light has infinite mass ? There you go . . . trying to destroy everything that Richard Feynman did to earn his Nobel

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Harry Veeder
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: vortex-l@eskimo.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 21:09:43 +0100 Sure it is quantized, but this doesn't make it apparent. Michel - Original Message - From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-19 Thread Harry Veeder
Oops! I meant No, instead of Yes, hmmm...but then again... Harry Harry Veeder wrote: Yes, but I would put it this way: an infinite force is required to accelerate a non-light particle to the speed light. Harry Dean McGowan wrote: Am I incorrect in assuming that a particle

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-18 Thread Zachary Jones
I built a trap version, and spent time looking at several demonstrated and proposed trap configurations (along with a host of testimonials from users). In the end, building a magnetic trap was the most satisfying route for me. The material that it collected was quite interesting, for a

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-18 Thread Zachary Jones
On Mar 17, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Jones Beene wrote: Well - the Ormus stuff and David Hudson, in particular, have been mentioned many times in the (far) past on vortex. Some of that Yea, I vaguely remember. A little secret; I transitioned to Vortex-L from Skeptics-L (was that what it was

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-18 Thread R.C.Macaulay
Zac wrote.. Did you hear about the recent assert of a 'new state of matter'? http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-03/ns-hrf031407.php Howdy Zac, My what big eyes you got, Granma as Little Red Riding Hood said to the big bad wolf. The people pursuing this theory are parallel

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-17 Thread Zachary Jones
Funny that ORMUS comes up here - a nice emergence. I worked with Barry a while ago; even pitched the ozonation tech he is connected with at a DOE shindig in 2001. I have a giant poster session in a closet somewheres. Seems like an age ago. Even back then they were pretty hush-hush about

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-17 Thread thomas malloy
Zachary Jones wrote: Funny that ORMUS comes up here - a nice emergence. I worked with Barry a while ago; even pitched the ozonation tech he is connected with at a DOE shindig in 2001. I have a giant poster session in a closet somewheres. Seems like an age ago. Interesting post

[Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-16 Thread R.C.Macaulay
Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts grin that can range from rail guns to Ormus... and that is a stretch. Now that light has been accepted as

[Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-16 Thread Jones Beene
Richard, One other thing turned up in my mini-quest to ascertain if there were any valid alternative energy aspects - to be found in the various allotrope's of oxygen This particular company/patent/consultant (ARAN) may be where you started, as it seems that you have been at this

[Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-16 Thread Michel Jullian
. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation_pressure Michel - Original Message - From: R.C.Macaulay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-16 Thread Harry Veeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone Howdy Jones, You amaze me with your ability to stretch the elastic of the mind. One must eat a heartly breakfast and tighten the safety belt before launching into one of your posts

Re: [Vo]: Re: Di-Ozone

2007-03-16 Thread Terry Blanton
On 3/16/07, Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is also the claim (unsubstantiated) that NASA is already using polyoxygen, and will be accelerating that use, but that seems unlikely, as the last shuttle launch still had the foam insulation - and something as basic as a new fuel would