Thanks Abd for that clear explanation,
As usual you are very strict with the required level of proof.
I have gathered some data that I think valid, but please all here correct
me if I'm wrong.
As far as i know, NiH heat anomaly was known sine 89 with some ignored
experience by Piantelli.
in 93
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Well, Mr. Gibbs, while I appreciate your reporting on Defkalion, you
continue to confuse and conflate two separate issues.
1. The reality of cold fusion as a physical phenomenon.
2. The existence of practical applications.
Exactly.
Reliably
Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as i know, NiH heat anomaly was known sine 89 with some ignored
experience by Piantelli.
in 93 I have been reading among the thousands of abstracts on CF, few
results about NiH , yet like everybody of that time I took them as minors...
It
On 2012-10-25 17:05, Jed Rothwell wrote:
1. It is lot harder to accomplish than it sounds. I can summarize it in
a single sentence, apply the Arata technique to nickel but that
describes years of effort.
This might sound like a naive question, but isn't the Arata technique
documented? And if
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
This might sound like a naive question, but isn't the Arata technique
documented? And if it isn't, why it isn't?
First, Arata's technique is documented, but not well according to some
people. He tends to keep secrets.
Second, when I said
Well, Mr. Gibbs, while I appreciate your
reporting on Defkalion, you continue to confuse
and conflate two separate issues.
1. The reality of cold fusion as a physical phenomenon.
2. The existence of practical applications.
The kind of information you request below is
entirely focused, in
Dear Abd,
Some people are focused on Truth, some on Value.
Mark is interested in Value- he wants CF/LENR to be useful, to do something
good- give energy to the people.
Your premises being different there is difficult to arrive at compatible
views.
However if CF generates Value, than it is
Hello group,
After contacting Michael A. Nelson directly and receiving confirmation
that he attended as an independent witness to Defkalion GT testings, it
looks like Mark Gibbs changed his tune a bit. Full article here:
Le Oct 21, 2012 à 12:44 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com a écrit
:
After contacting Michael A. Nelson directly and receiving confirmation that
he attended as an independent witness to Defkalion GT testings, it looks like
Mark Gibbs changed his tune a bit. Full article here:
I wrote:
Storms, McKubre and Miles by implying that they are somehow not serious
scientists.
I have given away my Anglo-American ethnocentrism. I should add that these
three are are just several in a long list of capable researchers from all over
the world.
Eric
Gibbs:
I know that there will be a handful of people (the “believers” I
wrote about some time ago) who read that statement and cry “lies” but
the fact is that no one has yet demonstrated, definitively, that cold
fusion or LENR exists in a form that is actually useful.
Now the argument is being
of the story. He
does not yet realize that there is only one real side to this amazing story!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Oct 21, 2012 11:21 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A little more positive article on Cold Fusion
positive article on Cold Fusion from Gibbs
Gibbs:
I know that there will be a handful of people (the “believers” I
wrote about some time ago) who read that statement and cry “lies” but
the fact is that no one has yet demonstrated, definitively, that cold
fusion or LENR exists in a form
Sigh . . . Another ignorant article by Gibbs.
Here is what I just wrote in the Forbes article comment section:
The author wrote: Even so, the Defkalion tests were, as far as any cold
fusion experiment performed to date has gone, the best so far and they
were witnessed by someone who is, for
Good question Peter. I've been wondering something similar, just slightly
more specific. Ni-H has gotten a lot of attention lately. But what sequence
of Pd-D experiments over the years was most significant to the ...slow
erosion of the psuedoskeptic position... that Abd described in email to
the
If you go back and re-read my previous columns on cold fusion you'll see
that my interest has *always* been in useful cold fusion ... The cold
fusion phenomena,
while scientifically intriguing, amounts to to nothing of practical
interest if you can't do something useful with it ... rather like
Best we figure out a way to contain the neutrinos, fission and fusion
products. I don't believe voids in a lattice is the answer, just creates
more fission and fusion products and corresponding low levels of radiation.
I still like the Papp idea if it can be contained safetly. Just my take
on
I don't have the time to review the huge amount of literature you people
have already looked at ... if any of you, Rothwell included, would like to
help build a list of successful experiments I'd be happy to build it into
an article with full attribution to all contributors. I'd like to see a
list
For the technical reader, this has already been done, here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf
I would be interested in cooperating to put something aimed at
non-technical readers together.
Jeff
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
I don't have
I should add that I don't have the training or experience to take the lead
on such an effort. I am just a basically competent writer with an interest
in the subject matter.
Jeff
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Jeff Berkowitz pdx...@gmail.com wrote:
For the technical reader, this has already
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
The cold fusion phenomena, while scientifically intriguing, amounts to to
nothing of practical interest if you can't do something useful with it ...
rather like muon catalyzed fusion ... Interesting but not practically
useful.
Oy veh. Where to begin?!?
Dear Mark,
First- thanks for the article. And may I invite you for a friendly
visit to my blog http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com, papers
labelled NEW ENERGY?
A good candidate for the best Pd-D LENR peak performer
is described here:
I wrote:
So, there has never been the *slightest doubt* that cold fusion is
capable of producing useful levels of energy if it can be controlled. There
is not one reason to think that!
Per a suggestion by Jeff Berkowitz, I should clarify what I meant by that:
It was established that cold
...@gibbs.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A little more positive article on Cold Fusion from Gibbs
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, October 21, 2012, 10:37 AM
If you go back and re-read my previous columns on cold fusion you'll see that
my interest has always been in useful cold fusion
24 matches
Mail list logo
