Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Bob Cook
QM system being considered. The Pd system may be less complex. Bob - Original Message - From: "Jones Beene" To: Sent: Sunday, February 09, 2014 8:53 AM Subject: RE: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts From: Bob Cook * Ni is a ferro magnetic metal which can retain an

Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Axil Axil
Here are some pictures of the process of vortex formation http://www.nature.com/nnano/journal/v8/n5/full/nnano.2013.69.html On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > http://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2009/4133/pdf/Andre_Diss-00_Main_final.pdf > > When the temperature of ma

Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Axil Axil
http://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/volltexte/2009/4133/pdf/Andre_Diss-00_Main_final.pdf When the temperature of magnetic metals gets above the Curie temperature, their magnetic nature changes in state to the formation of magnetic vortex nano-domains. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jones Beene w

RE: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Jones Beene
Yes, there is a limit in the case of atoms (without getting into nuclear magnetics). In a number of papers, Dennis Letts recognized the possibility that the internal magnetic field for hydrogen, in particular - would be much stronger than an external field which could align it - on the order

Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Bob Higgins
This thought is sort of absurd. The magnetic field only increases with inverse square law when you are well OUTSIDE all of the sources and they can be considered an equivalent far point source. Just like the Earth's gravity doesn't become infinite as you approach the Earth's center of mass. As y

RE: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-09 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Cook * Ni is a ferro magnetic metal which can retain an alignment of the electrons so as to create a permanent magnet and B field after the elimination of an external field. Pd which is paramagnetic loses its internal B field when an external magn

Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-08 Thread Bob Cook
Axil To: vortex-l Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2014 9:31 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts There is no limit on the strength of a magnetic field. From the inverse square law, how strong can a magnetic field be at one nanometer on the walls of a nano-cavity, when

Re: [Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-08 Thread Axil Axil
There is no limit on the strength of a magnetic field. >From the inverse square law, how strong can a magnetic field be at one nanometer on the walls of a nano-cavity, when it is detected at 18cm to be 1.6 tesla? It is at least atomic level (10^5 tesla) or on the high end about 10^12 to 10^16 te

[Vo]:More Magnetic Coupling Thoughts

2014-02-06 Thread David Roberson
Looking deeper into the magnetic coupled positive feedback LENR reaction, I have a few ideas to pass along. I understand that a magnetic field has essentially unlimited access to the atomic structure. By this I mean that a large, static external field can penetrate through the electron cloud