Robin wrote:
...and both chose the number three because we live in a 3 dimensional universe.
And we live on the 3rd planet from the sun (between three jovian planets)
northwest of the Bermuda Triangle.
Regards
Fred President CEO, Third Planet Industries InK. :-)
Regards, Robin van
thomas malloy wrote:
John E W Keeley believed that there were three
subunits that made up the atom, Dale Pond created an
excellent graphic showing three spheres dancing around one another, It
can be seen at http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html#animatedtriplet
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
...and
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:32:35
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What
I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a
3 dimensional universe.
There's a
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:32:35
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
All the smoke and mirrors don't detract from the basic facts. What
I said stands. The number 3 is a direct consequence of living in a
3 dimensional universe.
There's a nonsequitor if ever I head one.
Not if
At 03:20 pm 20/03/2006 +1100, you wrote:
In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros.
One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates
to define space. one could use the locations along a big
ball of
- Original Message -
At 03:20 pm 20/03/2006 +1100, you wrote:
In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros.
One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates
to define space. one could use
At 07:37 am 20/03/2006 -0600, Richard wrote:
[snip}
What does all this mean ? It means that while
everybody was sipping tequila in the cantina,
the US went broke last week and nobody's got the
money to buy the next round of drinks no matter
how many dimensions you wind up with, call
RC Macaulay wrote:
- Original Message - From: Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17
-0600:
Hi Richard,
[snip]
Howdy Robin,
Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The
rings,
like the favorite magic trick using
- Original Message -
From: Robin van Spaandonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17
-0600:
Hi Richard,
[snip]
Howdy
-Original Message-
From: RC Macaulay
I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts
group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch
considering the universe is only an image of the real.
Really, all that is needed is 2 dimensions. As in
At 11:10 am 19/03/2006 -0500, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: RC Macaulay
I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts
group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch
considering the universe is only an image of the real.
Really, all
-Original Message-
From: Grimer
In short, it all depends how you choose to look at things.
Innit da trut!
Ackshully, the singularity contained all.
Terry
___
Try the New Netscape Mail Today!
Virtually Spam-Free | More Storage | Import
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:25:11
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Howdy Robin,
I agree that the number 3 represents three as I agree many in the Vorts
group are the SPOTP. A 3 dimensional universe may be a stretch considering
the universe is only an image of the real.
Richard
In reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s message of Sun, 19 Mar
2006 11:10:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Really, all that is needed is 2 dimensions. As in hologram, all the
information needed to create the third dimension is contained in the
two.
Terry
A Hologram does not contain all the information of a 3 D
In reply to Grimer's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:46:28 +:
Hi,
[snip]
Or even one come to that - a string of ones and zeros.
One doesn't have to use the three Cartesian coordinates
to define space. one could use the locations along a big
ball of wool. It may not be so convenient but is
, March 18, 2006 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi-nuclear LENR?
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:01
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up
any one of them, the other two
will follow. However, if you cut one
In reply to RC Macaulay's message of Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:17
-0600:
Hi Richard,
[snip]
Howdy Robin,
Simple explanations of physics are never as simple as viewed. The rings,
like the favorite magic trick using loops, may actually each be shaped in
the figure 8 .. plus in mobus form. Cutting
Frank,
This structure
has the property that no two rings are interlocking, therefore
if
any one of the rings is removed, then all three separate. That
would indicate temporary stability...
I was trying to visualize it with three proper rings and I
couldn't. I now
see why. It's cos they
Jones.
You picked up on the 137 contact points of (Crotalus cerastes Particlaes)
didn't you? :-)
Particle Wavelength Lambda = hc/E = circumference of frictionless jar.
containing said snake
Frequency f = c/lambda = 1.23e20 Hz for electron or positron.
Displacement current I = q*f =19.68
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:01
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up
any one of them, the other two
will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two
will fall apart, Chin said.
There is something magic
At 10:16 pm 15/03/2006 -0900, Horace wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm
This ring means that three objects are entangled.
If you pick up any one of them, the other two will follow.
However, if you cut one of them off, the other two will
fall apart, Chin
Howdy Frank,
Which is also an excellent theoretical description of the principle of the
Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube.
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Grimer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: Efimov state - key to multi
At 07:47 am 16/03/2006 -0600, you wrote:
Howdy Frank,
Which is also an excellent theoretical
description of the principle of the
Ranque-Hilsch vortex tube.
Richard
I see what you mean. You got there before
I did. But with all your very tangible
experience of such phenomena - that is
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up
any one of them, the other two
will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two
will fall apart, Chin said.
There is something magic about this number of three.
Ha! In a number of past posts I have tried to wax
At 09:10 am 16/03/2006 -0800, Jones wrote:
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up
any one of them, the other two
will follow. However, if you cut one of them off, the other two
will fall apart, Chin said.
There is something magic about this number of three.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/03/060315174950.htm
This ring means that three objects are entangled. If you pick up any
one of them, the other two will follow. However, if you cut one of
them off, the other two will fall apart, Chin said. There is
something magic about this
26 matches
Mail list logo
