I do not mean they got no positive results at all. As I recall, they got
small results and made little progress toward reproducibility. One of them
retired and the project ground to a halt.
- Jed
Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Could they no longer get the *original* *cell* to work, or was it just new
cells that didn't work?
As far as I know they used the same cell, but different cathodes. In cold
fusion, when you fail to reproduce most of the time the problem is in the
quote from Amoco document
This report will discuss briefly some of the early calorimetric
experiments on cold fusion and in more detail, a single experiment
just concluded.A closed cell electrolytic experiment has been
conducted using a palladium cathode and platinum anode with accurate
(+/-0.001
A cleaner copy is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
See also:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhisconstanthe.pdf
- Jed
I wrote:
A cleaner copy is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
The authors went over this. They may have made a few corrections. I seem to
recall there was a problem with a figure, which we fixed.
This is easier to read, and quote from.
Note the Discussion, which
From Jed:
I wrote:
A cleaner copy is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
Yes, adding page numbering would be useful.
When was the original report published? I don't see a date displayed on the
PDF copy.
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
When was the original report published? I don't see a date displayed on the
PDF copy.
It was circulated around 1994. They brought a copy to ICCF-4 (1994). I
well remember what happened when showed it to John Huizenga. He turned
green and fled. It
That was messed up! They sent me Fig. R5 but I forgot to add it. I added it
in now, plus I added page numbers. You may need to reload the file to see
them:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
- Jed
I wrote:
I talked to one of the researchers and some people who assisted. The
old company did not suppress this
I meant the oil company not the old company. I wasn't even using
dictation. I got that wrong the old fashioned way.
This file was originally dated March 19, 1990.
I have an
On 11-12-28 03:09 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I wrote:
A cleaner copy is here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/Lautzenhiscoldfusion.pdf
The authors went over this. They may have made a few corrections. I
seem to recall there was a problem with a figure, which we fixed.
The title of
On 11-12-28 04:37 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
I talked to one of the researchers and some people who assisted. The
oil company did not suppress this result. The researchers could not
reproduce it. After years of trying they finally gave up. However,
they stand by the original result.
Jed, do
11 matches
Mail list logo
