[mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 6:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
TimesImprovement In Yield
Axil-
Did you leave Ni out of your list of LENR capable metals on purpose? B
The surface arrangement of
m: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 12:43 PM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
Reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03899
Weyl-Kondo Semimetal in a Hea
nt: *Thursday, December 21, 2017 12:43 PM
> *To: *vortex-l
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
> TimesImprovement In Yield
>
>
>
> Reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03899
>
>
>
> Weyl-Kondo Semimetal in a Heavy Fermion
do-quantum-semimetal-defines-deuterated-palladium/
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM
To: vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovem
lladium/
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
> TimesImprovement In Yield
>
>
>
> IMHO, the muons come from hadroniz
]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the metallic
hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic hydrogen
My baby...the hohlraum!
On Dec 16, 2017 7:28 PM, wrote:
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:15:59 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>? What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
destroyed
>and replaced with each reaction. Now I h
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:15:59 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>? What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
>destroyed
>and replaced with each reaction. Now I haven't run the numbers, but intuitively
>I suspect that t
From: mix...@bigpond.com
➢ What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
destroyed
and replaced with each reaction. Now I haven't run the numbers, but intuitively
I suspect that the cost of the little device is going to exceed the monetary
value of the energy produced in
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:47:14
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>I checked to see if the reports say anything about gammas or neutrons
>associated with the B-11 fusion reaction or what happens to B-10, which is
>about 20% of natural boron. There may be activation a
ect: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the metallic
hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic hydrogen
accumulates and is eventually converted to mesons. This energy storag
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the
metallic hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic
hydrogen accumulates and is eventually converted to mesons. This energy
storage mechanism might be disrupted through the destruction of the
metallic hydrog
From: Axil Axil
➢ But Holmlid get a high energy reaction from excitation from a very low
powered laser. A petawatt laser is extreme overkill.
Yes - but the problem with the Holmlid approach (if we take his claims at face
value) is that the output energy is largely in the form of muons.
There
From: Axil Axil
➢ But Holmlid get a high energy reaction from excitation from a very low
powered laser. A petawatt laser is extreme overkill.
Yes - but the problem with the Holmlid approach (if we take his claims at face
value) is that the output energy is largely in the form of muons.
There
14 matches
Mail list logo