And other partisan hypocrisies:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/01/21/nr.sanchez.slater.limbaugh.cnn
http://tinyurl.com/bgb5ev
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Gosh Steven,
At least finish the sentence.. I hpoe He fails to turn the nation socialist.
Richard
Subject: [Vo]:OT: Limbaugh: I hope [BO] fails
And other partisan hypocrisies:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/01/21/nr.sanchez.slater.limbaugh.cnn
http://tinyurl.com/bgb5ev
R C Macaulay wrote:
At least finish the sentence.. I hpoe He fails to turn the nation socialist.
That would only be valid if Obama intended to turn the nation
socialist. I think it obvious that he does not.
Having said that, I think Limbaugh expressed himself awkwardly, and
he probably
Richard sez:
Gosh Steven,
At least finish the sentence.. I hpoe He fails to turn the nation socialist.
Richard
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/01/21/nr.sanchez.slater.limbaugh.cnn
http://tinyurl.com/bgb5ev
Look at Limbaugh's own web site:
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Many of Obamas supporters, including me, have grave doubts about
spending a trillion dollars to revive the economy.
I have few or no doubts about the need for such a remedy.
From what I have read -- long ago, it's true, when I was in school --
the attempted remedies at
Howdy Steven,
I'm not a fan of Rush Limberger cheese although I will credit him for
figuring out how to make 40 million a year as a talking head of the
republican party.. which is more than Clinton and Obama made.. well.. err..
up until ole Bill figured out how to work the Foundation angle.
I
This transcript is helpful:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/politics/2009/01/21/nr.sanchez.slater.limbaugh.cnn
It is clear that Limbaugh is either mistaken about Obama or he is
using a straw man argument (a logical fallacy
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/straw-man.html)
Limbaugh
I wrote:
I expect there will be nothing left of it, but the liquidation is
orderly, meaning the divisions and properties they sell OFF are not
going at fire-sale prices.
I mean that unless the market panics and prices fall far below normal
valuations, AIG's property should be enough to
Jed Rothwell wrote:
However, during the time the government is the majority shareholder, or
the top lender, it must have a controlling interest! Otherwise they will
just steal the money. I fear they are doing that already, because some
of the deals Bush cut gave the Feds non-voting stock,
Frontline did a revealing special on Limbaugh many years ago. The
installment is just as relevant today as when it first aired.
A famous interviewer (possibly B. Walters, but I'm not 100% sure on
that) once cornered Limbaugh in regards to his verbal tactics and
opinions on people and
Looks like cousin Tom is gonna be busy at the National Archives:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/index.htm
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 21, 2009 January 21, 2009
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT:
Terry sez:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20090121/index.htm
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
January 21, 2009 January 21, 2009
MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES
SUBJECT: Transparency and Open Government
...
I wonder
I am unaware of any comments by BO on the subject; however, many in
the cabinet are UFO Friendly. Podesta, BO's transition chair, was
Clinton's X-Files man:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/john_podesta.htm
Indeed, PRG thinks BO has assembled a UFO disclosure team,
unintentionally presumably:
In reply to Stephen A. Lawrence's message of Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:50:45 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Things look every bit as grave now as they were then, and this time
around we can't mobilize our way out -- we're *ALREADY* in a major war,
and if anything we're likely to demobilize during the next few
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:58:18 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
It is like wearing a big sign on
your back saying steal from me!
It's worse than that. The whole thing was deliberately constructed with the
collusion of those in power to provide a means for the wealthy and
Terry sez:
I am unaware of any comments by BO on the subject; however, many in
the cabinet are UFO Friendly. Podesta, BO's transition chair, was
Clinton's X-Files man:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/john_podesta.htm
Indeed, PRG thinks BO has assembled a UFO disclosure team,
OrionWorks wrote:
I continue to doubt that there will be any kind of an official
disclosure coming from the White House - especially within my life time.
A year ago, did you imagine there would be a black president in your
lifetime? I didn't. Life is full of surprises. As Eugene Robinson (a
My first thought when hearing about the From 43 to 44 envelope he found in
his desk.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:31 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:New Era of Openness
snip I wonder if BO will give us
Steven -
Not so much striking out and hating is heard on that show (if any) -
specific political opposition to liberalism is. But you wouldn't know that
unless you listened.
Far worse than completely miscasting RL's statements is your attempting to
create equivalence between regular Limbaugh
Jed sez:
I apologize for breaking apart some of your comments.
OrionWorks wrote:
I continue to doubt that there will be any kind of an official
disclosure coming from the White House - especially within my life time.
A year ago, did you imagine there would be a black president in
your
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Jed, BO has stated many liberal, progressive, and socialist policies that
will be promoted by his administration. His track record, most speech
content, and his associations indicate he is extremely liberal.
Not by my standards, but I get your point.
But he's been a
--- OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Years ago, I watched a number of late evening RL TV
shows that aired.
Almost invariably they all started out with
unimpressive cartoon skits
depicting Bubba doing something stupid, insofar as
conservatives
were concerned. Ok... I stand
Jed -
You may not agree with him, but you cannot accuse him of hiding his agenda
or views.
Synchronicity in action: At the very moment I read those words of yours
above I was listening to the recording of Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw
discussing how nobody knows where he really is philosophically
actually told the American public we need to grow
up! Talk about
audacity! Telling a bunch of overgrown children to
stop acting like
spoiled ninnies . . .
Jed,
Talk is cheap.
First point, I hope Obama DOES make things actually
better for us. It's crazy to hope that he fails so
badly that
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Alright, two can play at this game. You fellas want to further
pollute Vortex with this shit . . .
Speaking for myself, my remarks on this subject are carefully
considered, well researched and calm. I do not consider them shit.
I say that you, Kyle Mcallister, are out
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Synchronicity in action: At the very moment I read those words of yours
above I was listening to the recording of Charlie Rose and Tom Brokaw
discussing how nobody knows where he really is philosophically and to some
extent politically.
Obama resembles FDR in that he is
Rick Monteverde wrote:
Regarding guns:
A spokesperson for the NRA couldn't have said it better than he did. This
assumes (correctly) that the standard liberal take on firearms is to keep
and expand stringent laws like the (DC? NY?) law, if firearms are even
allowed to be to kept and borne at
HI Kyle,
...
I'm gonna build my windmills this summer. Maybe
they'll work, maybe not. If nothing else, I tried.
Given all I've sacrificed in making my 'carbon
footprint' smaller, it's more than I can say for the
likes of YOU. Let the finger point at whoever you are,
you know who you are.
This just in from the Hydrino-Friendly group: [SocietyforClassicalPhysics]
Mills sez:
we are working with collaborators to confirm hydrinos which is pretty
straight forward given our advances in isolation and analytical
techniques such as those given in our recent papers:
--- Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Alright, two can play at this game. You fellas want
to further
pollute Vortex with this shit . . .
Speaking for myself, my remarks on this subject are
carefully
considered, well researched and calm. I do not
haha...If you are just talking about income level, them stick
to low, middle, high *income* distinctions, rather than that
sanctimonious neo-Marxist term working-class.
Harry
- Original Message -
From: Kyle Mcallister kyle_mcallis...@yahoo.com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009 8:17 pm
No problem.
Just promote baby making. Let your (grand)children pay off the debts.
Come to think of it, perhaps that is why there was babyboom...?? haha
On second thought let's return to the gold fetish. bawahaha
Harry
- Original Message -
From: R C Macaulay walha...@cvtv.net
Date:
32 matches
Mail list logo