Adrian, I am using gmail which threads emails and has the newest at the
bottom which is not yours.
You need to either look into how Thunderbird arranges things, or switch to
something else.
Personally I would never go back to thunderbird after getting used to gmail.
What you see is not what
Sometimes you guys are discussing the details instead of the concept.
Believe me although I never been advising the government. Yes, I did talk
to a prominent world politician and found him just a a bunch of well
formulted sentences.
I agree with David. The problem is that we allow the private and
Please help me by fwd the article to as wide of an audience as possible.
http://benthamopen.com/journal/render-volume.php?volumeID=CHEMISTRY-V1
Frank Znidarsic
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The proposal
http://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/-in-our-hands_105549266790.pdf
from the conservative thinktank American Enterprise Institute's scholar
Charles Murray is worded as follows:
Henceforth, federal, state, and local governments
Congrats Frank!
Please keep us informed as to responses or reviews by the scientific
community.
-mark
From: Frank Znidarsic [mailto:fznidar...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 5:53 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:published in a peer review
Please help me by fwd the
Dear Friends,
Two papers; waiting news from MFMP
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/12/daily-shared-lenr-news.html
I wish you well..
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Thanks Mark, I will. I have all sent it out to many organizations. The
velocity in the paper 1,094,000 meters per second comes from my cold fusion
work. I don't mention that in the paper because I want the work to get out as
far as possible.
I also mention the 1.36 fermi dimension in the
Frank--
Nice work.
I assume you know about the latest theory regarding tunneling concepts
associated with nuclear reactions proposed by Gullstrom at Uppsala. It seems
to explain the Lugano results fairly well.
Your summary--The energy of a propagating light appears as a wave. Points of
When Robots Replace Human Workers (Harvard Business Review)
Progress in information storage and processing have made possible
the creation intelligent machines at amazing speed that will soon
dominate the world economy and devalue human labor:This is why we will
soon be looking at hordes
In reply to Kevin O'Malley's message of Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:40:29 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
This seems promising. I'm having trouble seeing the difference between
neutron tunneling and neutron capture.
[snip]
Neutron capture assumes the presence of free neutrons, which one would also
expect to turn up in
A simple law will fix the problem of robots replacing people. The main
features of such a law follow:
Only real persons shall be allowed to own a robot free of tax. Additional
robots can be owned by any given biological person, but at an increasing tax
as deemed necessary to keep
Damn good idea Bob!
Yes, people can get paid for what their robot does!
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
A simple law will fix the problem of robots replacing people. The main
features of such a law follow:
Only real persons shall be allowed to
It is more probable that hydrogen provides protons which enter the nucleus
in the LENR reaction. This proton surplus excess is the function of
hydrogen in the Ni/H reactor. The Ni/H LENR reaction results in a proton
rich nucleus. This nuclear condition is stabilized through the emission of
the
https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:27064120
I don't know anything of Gullstrom. What is omitted from the paper is when
the stimulation becomes strong enough the probability of nuclear transition
increases.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Dec 11, 2014 2:52 pm
My theory is not about neutrons. Its about the non-conservation of the
magnetic forces. In the nuclear case its the non-conservation of the spin
orbit force in vibrating Bose condensate. This is beyond the scope of the
simple paper.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
ref
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/10/mfmps-project-dog-bone-thread-update-1-first-test-on-dummy-core/
You mean:
http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/12/11/when-robots-replace-human-workers-harvard-business-review/
Regarding the dog bone test, note
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
A simple law will fix the problem of robots replacing people. The main
features of such a law follow:
Only real persons shall be allowed to own a robot free of tax.
Additional robots can be owned by any given biological person, but at an
Jed--
You noted: Finally, the moment you try to regulate such things, powerful
people and unscrupulous people will find ways to get around the regulations.
I would note that those kind of people have not gotten around the Atomic Energy
Act in this country very well. Energy produced by use of
Frank--
The Gullstrom paper(s) can be obtained here:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/?p=497
Gullstrom is a student at Uppsala University. His theory seems to have been
endorsed by a Lugano report author reporte by this web site.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Frank
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
I would note that those kind of people have not gotten around the Atomic
Energy Act in this country very well.
That is because radioactive material is difficult and expensive to produce
and easy to detect, and it is produced in only a few facilities.
Hello Bob, Yes it is tempting to regulate. The first knee-jerk reaction of
all bureaucrats. It never works. Licenses is another useless instrument -
good for everybody who likes corruption. KISS is the right solution.
All corporations have boards and are regulated to some degree. That will
never
Sure, if someone dies of old age.
A different story if one or both parents die from an accident leaving their
possibly still you children to fend for themselves.
They never thought of giving a whole lot of assets to the children.
But if they did and the child dies?
Maybe a better system would
Bob, there is one point I thought of when reading Jed's post.
And that is what is the difference between one robot the size of a human
and 1 robot that is the size of 50 people and has 50-100 arms and other
components?
What would normally be an army of robots could be made as one single robot.
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:14:56 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
It is more probable that hydrogen provides protons which enter the nucleus
in the LENR reaction. This proton surplus excess is the function of
hydrogen in the Ni/H reactor. The Ni/H LENR reaction results in a proton
.
This doesn't explain why the reaction stopped at 62Ni.
The one particle is one in a million. The transmutation result is just a
result of chance.
John ! I actually agree with you in the first part. My thinking was that
people will avoid the bad situation you describe and simply hand over what
they think their children would need. The standard income goes to everybody
and should be enough to live OK.
If the state gets to inherit than the
Jed--
Your last comment: I do not think so. I do not know of any
inherently safe products that regulated solely for the good of society.
Making beer and wine is limited and distilling ethanol is prohibited without a
license. (Ethanol, however, is considered safe and can
Jed wrote 5 years ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=vortex-l@eskimo.comq=subject:%22%5BVo%5D%3AMore+from+Takashashi+about+mixing%22I
had a brief conversation at ICCF-15 with Takahashi about mixing in the
Kitamura experiment.
***Jed:
Can you get in touch with Takahashi /or his team to
29 matches
Mail list logo
