I have read McCulloch's book. His proposition fails in causality. Filters
do not form with a filled state, they have a finite impulse response that
he hadn't addressed when I asked him about it.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:25 AM, Russ wrote:
> Here’s Mike McCulloch’s TedX talk last Thursday. It i
Bob Higgins—
What do you think about Mikes theory of quantized inertia (QI)? And what about
his use of QI to explain galactic mechanics without dark matter? Does the
emdrive mistake void the concept of QI?
(The Ted talk has been deleted from youtube apparently.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
There is a new study from NASA on dark matter/ dark energy and the
reinterpretation of the Chandra findings WRT the mystery radiation signature at
3.5 keV.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/a-new-twist-in-the-dark-matter-tale.html
CERN has a new report on DM as well. The informed
Hi Robin,
I've followed up on our question about photons having gravitational
influence by reading up on some threads on PhysicsForums and posing a
question of my own. The conclusion that classical beams of light bend
spacetime is a straightforward for mainstream physics; namely, they do.
(Do ind
>>black hole.
Crothers points out what mainstream says about black holes doesn't make sense:
Stephen Crothers on Black Hole`s
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
||
Stephen Crothers on Black Hole`s
Viva la Modern Physics, the monster keeps rolling | |
|
|
On Mond
Jones—
I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotation
problem. The Mills spectrum of DH surely warrants a comparative review with
the observed spectrum from the Milky Way or other near by galaxies.
Maybe Mills has already done this comparison; if not, he should I
6 matches
Mail list logo