The calculated external proton charge radius from magnetic moment is
0.840869916fm (measured 0.84087fm).
But things are not always that simple. The internal charge radius is
different and also the internal magnetic radius. That's all based on
SO(4) physics that certainly will replace SM for
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:58:02 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The answer is simple
>
>q^2 --> rm. Charge square is proportional to rotating mass. In a proton
>much more mass is needed to produce the same charge. Ergo adding an
>electron can do nothing...
>
>J.W.
Given
The answer is simple
q^2 --> rm. Charge square is proportional to rotating mass. In a proton
much more mass is needed to produce the same charge. Ergo adding an
electron can do nothing...
J.W.
Am 30.08.19 um 22:44 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri,
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:36:57 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
>nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
>function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
generation of physics models.
J.W.
Am 30.08.19 um 21:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
In
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:59:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>First a small theoretical update.
>
>A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
>with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
>structure. In SO(4) we have a 5
@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anti-matter
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>PS: And please forget the matter anti matter story. It is childish old
>physics thinking. Why e.g. can a nucleus expel antimatter
>(positron...) Annihilation is
First a small theoretical update.
A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
structure. In SO(4) we have a 5 rotation structure where core mass only
can have 4 and charge has 5. This model is highly
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>PS: And please forget the matter anti matter story. It is childish old
>physics thinking. Why e.g. can a nucleus expel antimatter
>(positron...) Annihilation is only one option when e- e+ meet.
Perhaps
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 01:59:00 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Some years ago people feared that CERN might produce black holes...
>
>the imagination of such things is deep old children instinct driven
>behavior that outplays the brain.
No, it's just caution, which is
ows 10
From: Jürg Wyttenbach
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 4:59:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Anti-matter
Some years ago people feared that CERN might produce black holes...
the imagination of such things is deep old children instinct driven
be
Some years ago people feared that CERN might produce black holes...
the imagination of such things is deep old children instinct driven
behavior that outplays the brain.
To split a proton you need to add about 53MeV. You can do this only with
dense Hydrogen as this state is able to directly
This is off topic but I have speculated that the eye creates a very small
amount of light so it might be place where spontaneous hawking radiation
occurs.
Harry
On Sat., Aug. 24, 2019, 8:49 p.m. Axil Axil, wrote:
> Rossi said that the SL reactor produces photons in the 100 to 200 nm
> range.
Rossi said that the SL reactor produces photons in the 100 to 200 nm range.
This is the photon energy that resolves when Hawking's radiation is
extracted from the vacuum. Those photons have negative frequency.
As I have repeated a few time: SK energy does not come from transmutation
but from
14 matches
Mail list logo
