What is really good is that they want to test it for 96 hours (48+48)
minimum. I think that will give so much more credibility to the invention.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
since defkalion feel that the COP is above 20, no need to have a scientist.
At 11:09 PM 1/23/2012, Alain Sepeda wrote:
since defkalion feel that the COP is above 20, no need to have a scientist.
Static would be fine IF you monitor the entire surface of the hyperion.
But I'm not at all happy with the two-thermometer COP calculation.
I've got some other stuff to do, but
I find it a little disappointing, that Defkalion are not going to use flow
calorimetry for their demos. Their choice of course. It is a bit hard to
understand their test procedure, they specify a Bare hyperion reactor but
what that means is unclear, it also sounds like they are not using a
static calorimetry is ok, if they open their core, and it seems to be in
the plan.
smaller reactor mean also less room to hide rabits...
I think that thei perfectly know how the demo will be, and they have done
it many time.
they probably have a very precise model of their reactor.
it is why
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I find it a little disappointing, that Defkalion are not going to use flow
calorimetry for their demos. Their choice of course.
I believe they intend to do that at a later date. Static (Isoperobolic)
calorimetry is a little easier to set up,
Has anyone stepped up yet, and is preparing to perform independent testing?
I assume there HAS to be interest in this subject.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
At 09:31 AM 1/24/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
At 11:09 PM 1/23/2012, Alain
Sepeda wrote:
since defkalion feel that the
COP is above 20, no need to have a scientist.
Static would be fine IF you monitor the entire surface of the
hyperion.
But I'm not at all happy with the two-thermometer COP
If we could pick any team in the world to do this testing, who would you
trust?
Who would be the Super Star team of scientists, skeptics and journalists
who would be the most credible?
On Jan 23, 2012, at 9:14 PM, Patrick Ellul ellulpatr...@gmail.com wrote:
Steorn had done something similar. But their testing dragged on and on ad
infinitum.
I would say teams from different universities, i.e. academia would make
good candidates.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Douglas Hill hil...@lemoyne.edu wrote:
If we could pick any team in the world to do
A few thoughts come to mind.
I think this forum can put together a team that would do a great job of
testing.
I know who would NOT be a good choice:
- NOT a university that has any involvement with hot fusion, CERN, etc.
- NOT a govt agency; can't trust them to be honest, or to do it
Need publicity as well as trained people to test it. There are many qualified
persons to set up the test. I suggest John Stossel to video the testing and
edit to use in his show.
- Original Message -
From: Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, January
I think the best would be an engineer- salesman like the one who had
installed my home heater BOSCH 3000W plus a technician specialized
in radioactivity measurements for an environment protection State
authorithy.
A good generator needs NO geniuses to confirm that it works well, I think.
On Tue,
since defkalion feel that the COP is above 20, no need to have a scientist.
moreover scientist are easy to manipulate (see the books of William
Broad, *Nicholas
Wade)*, so good old tricky engineer would be better.
if you are really paranoid, a good magician/prestidigitator could be a
consultant.
13 matches
Mail list logo
