Re: [Vo]:Nuclear spin coupling of hydrogen
In addition, these experiments show that hydrogen is not required to produce the LENR reaction. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 1:18 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > 2016 Klimov, A., et al., *High-energetic Nano-cluster Plasmoid and its > Soft X-ray Radiation.* J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2016. *19*. > > This poster can be found in > > http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedr.pdf#page=153 > > This experiment shows that the LENR reaction can occur in a plasma at > 7000C. This experiment puts to rest any low energy electron based LENR > causation. > > The same type of high energy environmental condition exists in the > production of charged clusters as described by Ken Shoulders where metal is > vaporized by a spark to produce the EVO. Also Proton 21 produces the LENR > reaction by vaporizing copper. > > On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> The interaction between the nuclear spin of hydrogen and a host metal >> like palladium is sensitive to “physics beyond the standard model.” >> >> >> >> IOW – it is not well understood. However, it may be a good time to >> assemble the main features of spin coupling which leads to facilitation of >> fusion. >> >> >> >> In the article below, the authors present a variational approach and >> calculate the constant J in the hydrogen molecule with controlled >> numerical precision, using the adiabatic approximation. This study >> supposedly improves the reliability of the NMR theory for searching new >> physics in the spin-spin coupling. But it gets much harder to characterize >> spin coupling with heavy metal hydrides. >> >> >> >> https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.083001 >> >> >> >> The constant J (and J-coupling) is not known to be relevant to a high >> energy reaction such as to facilitate nuclear fusion – but there must be >> more than electron chemistry involved to overcome the Coulomb barrier. Some >> isotopes however, have very high intrinsic nuclear spin and palladium has >> one such isotope. The standard model would need to be altered in order to >> find a way for spin coupling to overcome the Coulomb barrier – but that may >> happen easily, especially in the context of deuterium which is the only >> isotope with an overwhelming dipole bifurcation as it approaches a target >> nucleus. In addition to J-coupling we have Magic angles, a Nuclear >> Overhauser effect and Magnetic moment to deal with. >> >> >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-coupling >> >> >> >> There is a distinct likelihood that the active isotope of cold fusion in >> a palladium lattice has been identified by the recent analysis by Biberian >> of a P&F cathode from the French experiments - which produced a large >> amount of thermal gain 20 years ago. >> >> >> >> This is the palladium-105 isotope which converts to silver-107. Aside >> from that identification – the exact mechanism of the reaction is not >> known, nor is it known if helium ash is produced in this transmutation, or >> if it is – how much energy it represents. Nor is it certain that there is >> only one type of fusion reaction in cold fusion. There could be another >> distinct reaction, but as of now - the hard proof of transmutation only >> exists for the high spin isotope – 105Pd. >> >> >> >> However, almost certainly this identification of the active isotope >> serves to eliminate the hypothesis that the amount of helium produced >> correlates exactly with an energy gain in the range of 24 MeV per fusion >> reaction. >> >> >> >> At best, the gain would be less per fusion and the helium derives from >> lithium-6 fusing with palladium 105… which seems unlikely to be the prime >> reaction. >> >> >> >> More likely - for those who favor the “two step” methodology of >> Mills/Holmlid etc. or the binuclear atom of Accomazi - the proposed route >> is for UDD (or the di-deuterino or the binuclear atom) to approach the >> 105Pd nucleus as a neutral species, from whence the spin coupling results >> in additional range of strong force attraction so that we end up with a >> transmuted nucleus - 107Ag as a result plus a free deuteron, which can >> thermalize without the high energy gamma via the intrinsic spin mechanism. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [Vo]:Nuclear spin coupling of hydrogen
2016 Klimov, A., et al., *High-energetic Nano-cluster Plasmoid and its Soft X-ray Radiation.* J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2016. *19*. This poster can be found in http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedr.pdf#page=153 This experiment shows that the LENR reaction can occur in a plasma at 7000C. This experiment puts to rest any low energy electron based LENR causation. The same type of high energy environmental condition exists in the production of charged clusters as described by Ken Shoulders where metal is vaporized by a spark to produce the EVO. Also Proton 21 produces the LENR reaction by vaporizing copper. On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > > > > > The interaction between the nuclear spin of hydrogen and a host metal like > palladium is sensitive to “physics beyond the standard model.” > > > > IOW – it is not well understood. However, it may be a good time to > assemble the main features of spin coupling which leads to facilitation of > fusion. > > > > In the article below, the authors present a variational approach and > calculate the constant J in the hydrogen molecule with controlled > numerical precision, using the adiabatic approximation. This study > supposedly improves the reliability of the NMR theory for searching new > physics in the spin-spin coupling. But it gets much harder to characterize > spin coupling with heavy metal hydrides. > > > > https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.083001 > > > > The constant J (and J-coupling) is not known to be relevant to a high > energy reaction such as to facilitate nuclear fusion – but there must be > more than electron chemistry involved to overcome the Coulomb barrier. Some > isotopes however, have very high intrinsic nuclear spin and palladium has > one such isotope. The standard model would need to be altered in order to > find a way for spin coupling to overcome the Coulomb barrier – but that may > happen easily, especially in the context of deuterium which is the only > isotope with an overwhelming dipole bifurcation as it approaches a target > nucleus. In addition to J-coupling we have Magic angles, a Nuclear > Overhauser effect and Magnetic moment to deal with. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-coupling > > > > There is a distinct likelihood that the active isotope of cold fusion in a > palladium lattice has been identified by the recent analysis by Biberian of > a P&F cathode from the French experiments - which produced a large amount > of thermal gain 20 years ago. > > > > This is the palladium-105 isotope which converts to silver-107. Aside from > that identification – the exact mechanism of the reaction is not known, nor > is it known if helium ash is produced in this transmutation, or if it is – > how much energy it represents. Nor is it certain that there is only one > type of fusion reaction in cold fusion. There could be another distinct > reaction, but as of now - the hard proof of transmutation only exists for > the high spin isotope – 105Pd. > > > > However, almost certainly this identification of the active isotope serves > to eliminate the hypothesis that the amount of helium produced correlates > exactly with an energy gain in the range of 24 MeV per fusion reaction. > > > > At best, the gain would be less per fusion and the helium derives from > lithium-6 fusing with palladium 105… which seems unlikely to be the prime > reaction. > > > > More likely - for those who favor the “two step” methodology of > Mills/Holmlid etc. or the binuclear atom of Accomazi - the proposed route > is for UDD (or the di-deuterino or the binuclear atom) to approach the > 105Pd nucleus as a neutral species, from whence the spin coupling results > in additional range of strong force attraction so that we end up with a > transmuted nucleus - 107Ag as a result plus a free deuteron, which can > thermalize without the high energy gamma via the intrinsic spin mechanism. > > > > > > >
RE: [Vo]:Nuclear spin coupling of hydrogen
Biberian and I caught the first glimpse and identified this same silver anomaly at the US National Centre for Electron-Microscopy at Berkeley using a unique SEM/TOFSIMS machine back in the early 1990’s. Jean-Paul was a visiting scientist at the institute and managed to slip me in for some time studying my sonofusion samples on that unique machine that had a year-long waiting list for access time. He then volunteered and aome and work side by side in the lab that I shared with Roger Stringham and proved he is driven by the purest of scientific curiosity and a true friend could not be found. I know he remembers fondly the top burrito joint in Mountain View California where we dined. That initial work in the national lab led to extensive additional studies paid for the Electric Power Research Institute at Charles Evans Laboratory on their SEM and TOF SIMS instrument. There my good friend Tom Passell and I sat for several days with the operator of the instrument being the top expert and man who built it. There was a plethora of shifted isotope ratios observed, including the Ag 107 109, so much so it was a difficult puzzle to unravel. This was the conorstone of my coming to understand that cold fusion is a natural phenomenon readily observable and understandable when one creates and observes the rare atom-ecology environment that is ultra-dense deuterium in metals. Thanks to friend Martin Fleischmann on his considerable council to me over the years on the uniqueness and wonder of what he called ‘gamma phase’ deuterium. Proven in my collaboration with Dr. George Chambers of NRL, as provided by NRL director Nagel, to be quite uniquely stable once created in palladium. From: Jones Beene Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2018 5:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Nuclear spin coupling of hydrogen The interaction between the nuclear spin of hydrogen and a host metal like palladium is sensitive to “physics beyond the standard model.” IOW – it is not well understood. However, it may be a good time to assemble the main features of spin coupling which leads to facilitation of fusion. In the article below, the authors present a variational approach and calculate the constant J in the hydrogen molecule with controlled numerical precision, using the adiabatic approximation. This study supposedly improves the reliability of the NMR theory for searching new physics in the spin-spin coupling. But it gets much harder to characterize spin coupling with heavy metal hydrides. https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.083001 The constant J (and J-coupling) is not known to be relevant to a high energy reaction such as to facilitate nuclear fusion – but there must be more than electron chemistry involved to overcome the Coulomb barrier. Some isotopes however, have very high intrinsic nuclear spin and palladium has one such isotope. The standard model would need to be altered in order to find a way for spin coupling to overcome the Coulomb barrier – but that may happen easily, especially in the context of deuterium which is the only isotope with an overwhelming dipole bifurcation as it approaches a target nucleus. In addition to J-coupling we have Magic angles, a Nuclear Overhauser effect and Magnetic moment to deal with. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-coupling There is a distinct likelihood that the active isotope of cold fusion in a palladium lattice has been identified by the recent analysis by Biberian of a P&F cathode from the French experiments - which produced a large amount of thermal gain 20 years ago. This is the palladium-105 isotope which converts to silver-107. Aside from that identification – the exact mechanism of the reaction is not known, nor is it known if helium ash is produced in this transmutation, or if it is – how much energy it represents. Nor is it certain that there is only one type of fusion reaction in cold fusion. There could be another distinct reaction, but as of now - the hard proof of transmutation only exists for the high spin isotope – 105Pd. However, almost certainly this identification of the active isotope serves to eliminate the hypothesis that the amount of helium produced correlates exactly with an energy gain in the range of 24 MeV per fusion reaction. At best, the gain would be less per fusion and the helium derives from lithium-6 fusing with palladium 105… which seems unlikely to be the prime reaction. More likely - for those who favor the “two step” methodology of Mills/Holmlid etc. or the binuclear atom of Accomazi - the proposed route is for UDD (or the di-deuterino or the binuclear atom) to approach the 105Pd nucleus as a neutral species, from whence the spin coupling results in additional range of strong force attraction so that we end up with a transmuted nucleus - 107Ag as a result plus a free deuteron, which can thermalize without the high en
