2016 Klimov, A., et al., *High-energetic Nano-cluster Plasmoid and its Soft
X-ray Radiation.* J. Condensed Matter Nucl. Sci., 2016. *19*.

This poster can be found in

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/BiberianJPjcondensedr.pdf#page=153

This experiment shows that the LENR reaction can occur in a plasma at
7000C. This experiment puts to rest any low energy electron based LENR
causation.

The same type of high energy environmental condition exists in the
production of charged clusters as described by Ken Shoulders where metal is
vaporized by a spark to produce the EVO. Also Proton 21 produces the LENR
reaction by vaporizing copper.

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> The interaction between the nuclear spin of hydrogen and a host metal like
> palladium is sensitive to “physics beyond the standard model.”
>
>
>
> IOW – it is not well understood. However, it may be a good time to
> assemble the main features of spin coupling which leads to facilitation of
> fusion.
>
>
>
> In the article below, the authors present a variational approach and
> calculate the constant J in the hydrogen molecule with controlled
> numerical precision, using the adiabatic approximation. This study
> supposedly improves the reliability of the NMR theory for searching new
> physics in the spin-spin coupling. But it gets much harder to characterize
> spin coupling with heavy metal hydrides.
>
>
>
> https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.083001
>
>
>
> The constant J (and J-coupling) is not known to be relevant to a high
> energy reaction such as to facilitate nuclear fusion – but there must be
> more than electron chemistry involved to overcome the Coulomb barrier. Some
> isotopes however, have very high intrinsic nuclear spin and palladium has
> one such isotope. The standard model would need to be altered in order to
> find a way for spin coupling to overcome the Coulomb barrier – but that may
> happen easily, especially in the context of deuterium which is the only
> isotope with an overwhelming dipole bifurcation as it approaches a target
> nucleus.  In addition to J-coupling we have Magic angles, a Nuclear
> Overhauser effect and Magnetic moment to deal with.
>
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J-coupling
>
>
>
> There is a distinct likelihood that the active isotope of cold fusion in a
> palladium lattice has been identified by the recent analysis by Biberian of
> a P&F cathode from the French experiments - which produced a large amount
> of thermal gain 20 years ago.
>
>
>
> This is the palladium-105 isotope which converts to silver-107. Aside from
> that identification – the exact mechanism of the reaction is not known, nor
> is it known if helium ash is produced in this transmutation, or if it is –
> how much energy it represents. Nor is it certain that there is only one
> type of fusion reaction in cold fusion. There could be another distinct
> reaction, but as of now - the hard proof of transmutation only exists for
> the high spin isotope – 105Pd.
>
>
>
> However, almost certainly this identification of the active isotope serves
> to eliminate the hypothesis that the amount of helium produced correlates
> exactly with an energy gain in the range of 24 MeV per fusion reaction.
>
>
>
> At best, the gain would be less per fusion and the helium derives from
> lithium-6 fusing with palladium 105… which seems unlikely to be the prime
> reaction.
>
>
>
> More likely - for those who favor the “two step” methodology of
> Mills/Holmlid etc. or the binuclear atom of Accomazi - the proposed route
> is for UDD (or the di-deuterino or the binuclear atom) to approach the
> 105Pd nucleus as a neutral species, from whence the spin coupling results
> in additional range of strong force attraction so that we end up with a
> transmuted nucleus - 107Ag as a result  plus a free deuteron, which can
> thermalize without the high energy gamma via the intrinsic spin mechanism.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to