. Worldwide attention would have been
guaranteed, especially if then police and fire brigades come and stop the
experiment. ;-)
Peter
- Original Nachricht
Von: Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October
Von: Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Hi Peter,
It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the heat
dissipater and they'd need a pretty good
- Original Nachricht
Von: Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Hi Peter,
It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the
heat
-Original Message-
From: peter.heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 3:36 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Yes this is true.
t was a quick idea that I had during work and posted during work without much
onsideration
the experiment. ;-)
Peter
- Original Nachricht
Von: Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 03.11.2011 02:43
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Hi Peter,
It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping
:43
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Hi Peter,
It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the
heat
dissipater and they'd need a pretty good pump to get a vacuum.
Colin
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:17
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think I know the reason why there is always a question in such a
demonstration. No one has ever performed an experiment that has completely
eliminated any optional explanation for the results obtained.
On the other hand, some experiments are more
Am 03.11.2011 18:25, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com mailto:dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think I know the reason why there is always a question in such a
demonstration. No one has ever performed an experiment that has
completely eliminated any optional
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
He must allow to connect tested and calibrated calorimetric equipment
provided by an independent party to the steam output of the ecat, and allow
to connect professional instruments that record the electrical input power.
Thats all. Then he must
Am 03.11.2011 19:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de
wrote:
He must allow to connect tested and calibrated calorimetric
equipment provided by an independent party to the steam output of
the ecat, and allow to connect
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 2:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Am 03.11.2011 19:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
He must allow to connect tested and calibrated calorimetric equipment
Am 03.11.2011 20:07, schrieb David Roberson:
Can you show proof that it is a scam?
No. Rossi knows how much scammers are out there and are competing. He
often complains about all these snakes that are paid by hostile and
fraudulent competition.
If he wants to be different then he must show
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
He must do this if he wants to do a scientific level proof of evidency.
He has said countless times that he does not care what scientists think. He
is only interested in what his customers think. That is a perfectly valid
set of standards. Many
diameter October 28 - new considerations
Am 03.11.2011 20:07, schrieb David Roberson:
Can you show proof that it is a scam?
No. Rossi knows how much scammers are out there and are competing. He often
complains about all these snakes that are paid by hostile and fraudulent
competition.
If he
I hope Piantelli is like Conrad Roentgen.
He worked for years in total secrecy and silency and did not tell a word
to others.
And then he presented a scientific work and experiments that gave total
proof.
Piantelli behaves like a real scientist until now.
Lets hope for a surprise.
He has
Following up on Jed's comments:
Conjecture that Rossi has been, in a sense, indirectly obfuscating
some of his own results - as if to throw the bloodhounds off of his
scent trail has been discussed to some extent within the Vort
Collective. I suspect there is some merit to such conjecture.
It's
peter.heck...@arcor.de
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 3:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
I hope Piantelli is like Conrad Roentgen.
e worked for years in total secrecy and silency and did not tell a word
o others.
nd then he presented
Am 03.11.2011 20:51, schrieb David Roberson:
I am afraid we need an engineer instead of scientist. Engineers get
the task completed in a manner that is acceptable for production, at
least eventually.
Think about this man at Fraunhofer (I dont remember his name) who
invented MP3.
He tried to
it will be
accepted.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 4:08 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Am 03.11.2011 20:51, schrieb David Roberson:
I am afraid we need
Am 03.11.2011 21:14, schrieb David Roberson:
Having the patent granted may not be such an important goal for him at
this time. The longer he waits, the further into the future it
extends. This reminds me of the submarine patents that come up far
into the future when the most money is made.
.
Beg, plead, cry, or anything else that feels right. He does what he thinks is
best.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Nov 3, 2011 4:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Pipe diameter October 28 - new considerations
Am
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I hope Piantelli is like Conrad Roentgen.
He worked for years in total secrecy and silency and did not tell a word to
others.
And then he presented a scientific work and experiments that gave total
proof.
Piantelli
I would have to say that I agree that it must be possible since the system is
working. When all the questions have been answered, it will become clear that
the ECAT is real. Let's proceed to make it a viable design.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: peter.heckert
Hi Peter,
It could only be a vacuum if they were pumping the water out of the heat
dissipater and they'd need a pretty good pump to get a vacuum.
Colin
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 8:17 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Hi,
I recalculated the pipe diameter needed for the 1MW plant.
There is an
24 matches
Mail list logo
