Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Axil Axil
Getting pad for the EVR test was still possible at that juncture and Rossi might not have wanted to say anything that would discourage that payment, On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Eric Walker wrote: > A few days seem like an eternity. Anyone remember this statement

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Eric Walker
A few days seem like an eternity. Anyone remember this statement from Rossi in early March? Velda Funderburke March 11, 2016 at 6:17 AM Dr Andrea Rossi: After the press release of Tom Darden the usual imbeciles are talking of divorce between IH and Leonardo Corporation: can you comment on this

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Frank Znidarsic
Steven Kirvit reports. Steven was in this early and went to see Rossi in Europe. http://news.newenergytimes.net/2016/04/08/industrial-heat-says-goodbye-to-rossi/#more-43319 Frank

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Daniel Rocha
So, according to Rossi, IH has everything. All the know-how necessary to build a reactor. I hope this is true and the Chinese use the invention in the most pervasive way! 2016-04-08 23:23 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil : > Rossi is pissed because his IP was given to competitors. > >

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Axil Axil
Rossi is pissed because his IP was given to competitors. Andrea Rossi April 7, 2016 at 8:32 PM Hank Mills: They prepared everything, the charges, the body of the reactor EVERYTHING !!!. I just teached to them what to do. They

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Axil Axil
The Lugano reactor was IH tech. This marginal system is what IH is concerned about. They need Rossi's new systems. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Bob Higgins > wrote: > > As I have

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Bob Higgins
Nothing to disagree with there. I think there is something fishy going on, like the MW reactor supplying heat 24/7, but Rossi is choosing to pick the best 8 hours of the day to calculate his reactor's performance. With that kind of thinking (and I am just speculating), a set of rechargeable

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Eric Walker
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: As I have previously pointed out, Clarke's analysis is flawed in terms of > COP analysis - perhaps as badly as the analysis by the Lugano researchers. > Failure to recognize and account for the transmitted radiation

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Jones Beene
From: Bob Higgins Don't get me wrong, Tom Clarke did good forensic research and wrote a good paper. In Clarke's comment about the translucency, he states: "This error is impossible to quantify because it depends on the heater wire emissivity, temperature, and surface coverage, all of which

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Dave
I do not accept this analysis as definitive. Please note the very rapid change in measured temperature of the Lugano reactor that occurs with a small change in input drive power. How would you explain that as a function of the material? Do you believe that the material changes properties

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Axil Axil
The Lugano test was a demonstration of IH technology that was in place as of a few months ago. Rossi supported the test but had nothing to do with it or had any stake in that test succeeding. The state of IH LENR tech as show by Lugano was poor even if Rossi told IH how to produce the fuel. The

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Bob Higgins
Don't get me wrong, Tom Clarke did good forensic research and wrote a good paper. In Clarke's comment about the translucency, he states: "This error is impossible to quantify because it depends on the heater wire emissivity, temperature, and surface coverage, all of which are unknown." I agree,

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Jones Beene
Bob, Your point about the transmitted radiation is answered by Clarke’s final quoted observation, which I included. Since transmitted radiation would be greater with greater input power -- if it were to be relevant -- we can judge its relevance by looking at differential COP. Since the

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Axil Axil
A large blob of melted nickel that was pealed out of the Lugano reactor speaks louder than any thermocouple. The core of the Lugano reactor got beyond 1455C no matter what the external temperature reading showed or how those measurements were made. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Bob Higgins
Jones, As I have previously pointed out, Clarke's analysis is flawed in terms of COP analysis - perhaps as badly as the analysis by the Lugano researchers. Failure to recognize and account for the transmitted radiation through the outer envelope is a BIG error. Insufficient data was taken and/or

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: > If anyone is still operating under the illusion that there was valid > thermal > gain at Lugano, please re-educate yourself via the authoritative work of > Thomas Clarke. > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1c8DgA3A7ovRVhQcHBweTVNbjg/view?pref=2 >

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Jones Beene
If anyone is still operating under the illusion that there was valid thermal gain at Lugano, please re-educate yourself via the authoritative work of Thomas Clarke. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1c8DgA3A7ovRVhQcHBweTVNbjg/view?pref=2 =1 The conclusion: The analysis here shows that the

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Jones Beene
From: Robert Dorr I stand corrected. Rossi said, just today, that I.H built the E-Cat for the Lugano test and that they even signed it. But the Lugano reactor did not produce significant excess heat, after the measurement errors were accounted for, so the Lugano fiasco reaffirms the

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-08 Thread Robert Dorr
I stand corrected. Rossi said, just today, that I.H built the E-Cat for the Lugano test and that they even signed it. Robert Dorr WA7ZQR On 4/7/2016 7:11 PM, Robert Dorr wrote: You will notice it says that Rossi and I.H. provided an E-Cat for "a" test measurement (I read as a singular

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
Rossi: " I have to comment the press release of IH, being a press release and not a forensic act. They made the Lugano reactor ( they also signed it ) they made many replications of which we have due record and witnesses, they made multiple patent applications ( without my authotization )

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Eric Walker
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Craig Haynie wrote: Isn't it also true that one of their observers has been making positive > remarks during the past year, as well? > Fulvio Fabiani was one of the two people engaged by IH to keep tabs on the test. But he's basically a

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Robert Dorr
You will notice it says that Rossi and I.H. provided an E-Cat for "a" test measurement (I read as a singular measurment) not necessarily for the Lugano Test. Possibly to verify any ionizing radiation. So many possible ways to read all of this rapidly developing information. Robert Dorr

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Russ George
. From: Craig Haynie [mailto:cchayniepub...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 6:50 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC. On 04/07/2016 09:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote: From: Craig Haynie

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Robert Dorr wrote: > I keep seeing that supposedly I.H. was the one that built the e-cat used > in the Lugano test. As far as I can see that is completely untrue. > I.H. is mentioned in the Lugano paper three times: In the course of the year following the previous tests,

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
On 04/07/2016 09:36 PM, Jones Beene wrote: *From:*Craig Haynie ØThey also paid Rossi $10 million dollars, after validating that the device was working… Not exactly. The logical error is cause and effect. Yes, they paid the installment, but elsewhere they clearly state that "Industrial

RE: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Jones Beene
From: Craig Haynie Ø They also paid Rossi $10 million dollars, after validating that the device was working… Not exactly. The logical error is cause and effect. Yes, they paid the installment, but elsewhere they clearly state that "Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
On 04/07/2016 08:19 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: But now that IH said they could not get Rossi to prove anything, Rossi shouldn't have got anything. And note that the claim that the experiment prove anything came from Rossi's side. So, we are concluding that he got 10 million based on what "Rossi

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
But now that IH said they could not get Rossi to prove anything, Rossi shouldn't have got anything. And note that the claim that the experiment prove anything came from Rossi's side. So, we are concluding that he got 10 million based on what "Rossi said". 2016-04-07 21:03 GMT-03:00 Craig Haynie

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
On 04/07/2016 08:00 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Isnt the 10 million on an escrow account? As far as I understood, IH even bought a unit before completing the reactor. The $10 million was on escrow at the beginning, until IH validated that the machine was working, and producing at least 6 COP.

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
Isnt the 10 million on an escrow account? As far as I understood, IH even bought a unit before completing the reactor. 2016-04-07 20:57 GMT-03:00 Craig Haynie : > You're right. I have made two mistakes in two days. Something's wrong. I'm > just not concentrating on what

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
You're right. I have made two mistakes in two days. Something's wrong. I'm just not concentrating on what I'm writing. :) Craig On 04/07/2016 07:54 PM, Robert Dorr wrote: It wasn't a month long test, it was a 24 hour test performed in Ferrara Italy. I keep seeing that supposedly I.H. was

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Robert Dorr
It wasn't a month long test, it was a 24 hour test performed in Ferrara Italy. I keep seeing that supposedly I.H. was the one that built the e-cat used in the Lugano test. As far as I can see that is completely untrue. Robert Dorr WA7ZQR At 03:55 PM 4/7/2016, you wrote: They also paid

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Craig Haynie
They also paid Rossi $10 million dollars after validating that the device was working for a month. Craig On 04/07/2016 06:54 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: "Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to substantiate the results claimed by Mr. Rossi from the E-Cat technology – all without

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
This is the link: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/industrial-heat-statement-on-meritless-litigation-from-leonardo-corporation-and-andrea-rossi-300248066.html 2016-04-07 19:54 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha : > "Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to

Re: [Vo]:Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

2016-04-07 Thread Daniel Rocha
"Industrial Heat has worked for over three years to substantiate the results claimed by Mr. Rossi from the E-Cat technology – all without success". It seems imply that Rossi did not generate any extra heat. I don't think they they'd say "without success" if any COP>1 was found, since the claim