[Vserver] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: java crash in vserver...
Hi Jan, Jan Zuchhold wrote: I made a package of my guest 'gis' (about 465 MB): /etc/vservers/gis (config of the image) /vservers/gis (home of the guest images) http://www.archit.uni-karlsruhe.de/geoserver/vserver.tar.bz2 ok, i've tried it. Great thanks a lot! The problem is caused by running out of space on /tmp. You mount that on tmpfs, specified in fstab in the vserver-config dir: none /tmptmpfs size=16m,mode=1777 0 0 If you remove or comment-out this line (or increase the size), it works. With a size of 64m it works for me. Thanks to all for solving this topic! Regards Thomas ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Gentoo and hashified files
Hi, Does anyone successfully use vunify/vhashify with Gentoo-based vservers? If so, could you share some pointers to getting started, as well as possible pitfalls, e.g. related to emerging new packages, having different USE-flags and such? Cheers, Einar S. Idsø ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] possibly dumb question
On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:26, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 10:51:49AM -0400, Chuck wrote: i am installing a workstation which i have no plans to use as a vserver host however there may be that possibility in the mid to far future... if you add the Linux-VServer patches, you will find an application for the features sooner than you think (e.g. limit a service to certain ips, use the CoW link breaking to save diskspace ...) heh never thought of using the features elsewhere :) thanks! btw, a few hours after i sent the original message, i was forced to retire the remote kde desktop server i have set up for our other remote admins (psu failed 'hot' and several motherboard chips literally exploded) , so now i do have a need for a guest :) are the kernels produced with the vserver patches 'improved' over std kernels and generally work better? or is it by its nature causing slight overhead compared to without? if there is noticeable overhead, it is considered a bug and should be reported :) i guess it boils down to use vserver patches on a normal workstation kernel or not? i have this undefined suspicion it is better with but would like a more factual answer :) well, it should not hurt, of course, if you don't need it, and/or already patched your kernel with several other patches, I would not compile it in just for the fun of doing it ... got lazy and installed the gentoo vserver-sources rather than work on a vanilla kernel. HTH, Herbert -- Chuck ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver -- Chuck ...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger, and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] debian host wants centos guest
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:16:33PM +0200, Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: thanks , i setup the beast and have yum installed but..: bash-3.00# yum update Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - Null is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: update Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: update i cannot seems to make this works :) using vyum on the host works (this is how i setup yum on the guest. But inside it it fails :( i tried to install whitebox linux but i failed also to find how to build the guest so i stick with centos :) hi, i have some finished centos 5 images for linux vserver: http://www.cryptronic.de/wiki/Vserver_en:images_for_openvcp to get yum working: edit /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo and replace $releasever and $basearch with hardcoded values eg $relesevar: 5 $basearch: i386 after that yum works quite fine. Why would you do that? Why doesn't it have centos-release installed, and why can't it figure out the architecture on its own? best regards oliver werner htpt://www.cryptronic.de What's HTPT? ;-) a tpyo :) have fun, Herbert -- Daniel Hokka Zakrisson ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Re: [Vserver] debian host wants centos guest
Hi there, on Monday, May 14, 2007 at 5:35:12 PM there was posted: htpt://www.cryptronic.de What's HTPT? ;-) HP a tpyo :) or the new Hyper-Text protocolled transport (i.e. Data Retention enhanced service = dres:// ) HP have fun, -- regards 'n greez, Guenther Fuchs (aka muh and powerfox) ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[Vserver] Localhost definition problem with Postfix/Amavisd-new
Dear all, Today I write to Herbert because I lost my mail account password, but now I retrieve itso I have a question to ask you. I have Debian Etch with a vserver, having a base host and two vservers. One of these vservers has a LDAP server with localhost mapped to a private non-routable IP and it runs OK, and the other vserver has a mail server using Postfix/Courier/Amavisd-new/Spamassassin/Clamav, where I map localhost to 192.168.0.1 (another private non-routable IP). But I can't put the mail server to work because the Postfix can't establish a connection to the amavisd. Because of the variety of components I suspect that amavisd-new, spamassassin or clamav are hardcoded to 127.0.0.1, so I can't use a private non-routable IP as localhost. My question is: do you recommend to me to map localhost to 127.0.0.1 as usual in my mail server (vserver) because some mail packages could be hardcoded ??? Or is it OK to continue using localhost mapped to 192.168.0.1 defined as the localhost interface of my vserver Thanking in advance, Alejandro ___ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
