I must admit (sheepishly) that I have Bigpond Broadband ADSL.
Yes, it is expensive, but I was able to cancel one of our office phone
lines by having it. As well, by having all plans, ie. mobile,
landline, long distance calls etc. with Telstra, I get 15% off all
bills. So pricing should be
Do members have an opinion on whether Panther is generally faster when
run on older machines ie G3?
I have a Beige 233 which currently has Jaguar but not surprisingly runs
it a bit slowly. If Panther is likely to help I might upgrade. Similar
story with: bronze powerbook 333 (handles Jaguar
Try going here but obviously real experience from real people will
also help !
http://www.apple.com/macosx/upgrade/requirements.html
Bob
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, at 06:18 AM, David de la Hunty wrote:
Do members have an opinion on whether Panther is generally faster when
run on
Thanks heaps to you all for the educational information !
My immediate problem has now been rectified by :-
Booting back into OS9.1 and recalibrating the Monitor from the Monitor
control panel.
The same adjustments did not seem to be available in OSX.
( Apple 1710 monitor. )
Reduced the
Hi:
I am considering my next Power Book purchase and am thinking about going to
the 17 model. It is really a contest between the upper-level 15 or the
17.
Could anyone out there who uses a 17 or has experience with both machines
send me an email on or off list with their personal opinion on what
Hi Nat
Just on the way out so it will be brief -
I've had 3 x 15 Ti PowerBooks (myself) and now have a 1.33GHz 17
Aluminium PowerBook. Quite simply the 17 is great. I was skeptical
about moving from a Ti model to the Aluminium but since purchase I've
never regretted the move.
I've taken
just my 2cents:
i bought a powerbook 3 weeks ago for video edits grafix --- exellent
it just took me along time to adjust to panther because it's so
different from the os 9.xx
be aware the system disk included has !old! versions of software thus
makes the $6000 machine partly unusable
i
On Saturday, February 7, 2004, at 12:57 PM, Mrs C wrote:
2. I use Adobe and Macromedia projects and am getting into iMovie and
may,
in the next few years, be thinking Final Cut Pro;
Can't imagine FC would be much fun on a 15 screen.
just a thought
Stew
5. I am debating whether an extra 2 of screen is worth the price
differential;
That 2 of screen is actually 1440x900 - 1280x854 pixels = 202880
more pixels than the 15 model which is about 18.6% more screen real
estate.
Have fun,
Shay
--
=== Shay Telfer
9 matches
Mail list logo
