Re: [Warzone-dev] patch 835 is not right?

2007-03-04 Thread Gerard Krol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch in 835 which is (i think), pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode) if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);} Is wrong. I don't hope so, that was my first commit ;) This breaks shadows & backdrops. You can tell instant at CAM_3A.

Re: [Warzone-dev] gdmps in 2.0?

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Christian Ohm: > On Sunday, 4 March 2007 at 0:22, Per Inge Mathisen wrote: > > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >So what do you think should be done? > > >Leave it as is (was before my commits) and don't try to automate the > > >backtrace

Re: [Warzone-dev] gdmps in 2.0?

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
I think the xdg-mail app in http://portland.freedesktop.org/wiki/ is supposed to solve the problem of how to send email from an application. But how it could deal with people like me who uses gmail over http and pine over ssh, I do not know. I doubt it can. I suspect many today use webmail and sim

[Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r841 - /trunk/configure.ac

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per I. Mathisen: > Author: per > Date: Sun Mar 4 13:32:02 2007 > New Revision: 841 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=841&view=rev > Log: > If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags > (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS}

[Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r842 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per I. Mathisen: > Author: per > Date: Sun Mar 4 13:35:51 2007 > New Revision: 842 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=842&view=rev > Log: > Fix includes to make it compile again on my box. > > Modified: > trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c Perh

[Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r843 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > Author: devurandom > Date: Sun Mar 4 14:04:36 2007 > New Revision: 843 > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=843&view=rev > Log: > Remove now unneeded binary blob reader. This of course is the wrong commit message. Probably caused by th

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r841 - /trunk/configure.ac

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags > (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS} when we > sum up compiler flags. Otherwise the setting of some flags > > >from within configure will be rather pointless. I did

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r842 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box... What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU extension which caused a problem with a POSIX function... Without knowing which function this is, I have n

[Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Custom implementation of strsignal, which is a GNU extension. Can we safely assume a list of signals that is the same for all OSes? I think you should at least strip out those that are not POSIX, like SIGWINCH. See http://www.opengroup.org/

[Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
By the way, I do not believe the mapping of signal numbers to signal symbols (eg SIGSEGV) is mandated to be the same on all systems by a standard. So the wz_strsignal()'s array of strings for signal names may for all I know be system-specific. - Per _

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r842 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box... > > > > What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU > > extension which caused a problem with a

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > By the way, I do not believe the mapping of signal numbers to signal > symbols (eg SIGSEGV) is mandated to be the same on all systems by a > standard. So the wz_strsignal()'s array of strings for signal names > may for all I know be system-speci

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the other. And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime, it can never change ever thereafter... If a library compiled with SIGQUIT being 3 would communicate with a program com

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the other. > > And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime, it can never change > > ever thereafter... If a library co

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r844 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It can't... At least on compile time it is fixed in one way or the > > > other. And if eg. 3 is defined to SIGQUIT at compiletime,

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r842 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perhaps you could point out the problems the code created on your box... > > > > What do you need _GNU_SOURCE for? Maybe we can replace the GNU > > extension which caused a problem with a

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r843 - /trunk/lib/framework/exceptionhandler.c

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde: > > Author: devurandom > > Date: Sun Mar 4 14:04:36 2007 > > New Revision: 843 > > > > URL: http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/warzone?rev=843&view=rev > > Log: > > Remove now unneeded binary blob reader.

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r841 - /trunk/configure.ac

2007-03-04 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Sonntag, 4. März 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen: > On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If ${WZ_FLAGS} are to be able to override the default flags > > > (for example, -O2), it has to be *after* ${CFLAGS} when we > > > sum up compiler flags. Otherwise the setting of some f

Re: [Warzone-dev] Re: [Warzone-commits] r841 - /trunk/configure.ac

2007-03-04 Thread Per Inge Mathisen
On 3/4/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Didn't think of default values... Just used the ?automake? manual (or someone else's manual on automake, don't remember) which said that it should be done this way. So which gcc switches are the issue here? We can define a WZ_CFLAGS_2 for on

Re: [Warzone-dev] patch 835 is not right?

2007-03-04 Thread vs2k5
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The patch in 835 which is (i think), >> pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode) >> if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);} >> >> Is wrong. >> >I don't hope so, tha

Re: [Warzone-dev] patch 835 is not right?

2007-03-04 Thread Gerard Krol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch in 835 which is (i think), pimemode.c:void pie_ScreenFlip(CLEAR_MODE clearMode) if (screen_GetBackDrop()) { screen_Upload(NULL);} Is wrong.

Re: [Warzone-dev] patch 835 is not right?

2007-03-04 Thread vs2k5
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:35:09 -0500 Gerard Krol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 05:26:09 -0500 Gerard Krol >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I'm having no problems with GNA here, but maybe they are >already >>> over. >>>