Message d'origine
De: Dennis Schridde
A: Development list
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:35:07 +0100
Sujet: Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.1 beta 2
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
On Windows I'd use quesoglc-0.7-svn-755, Linux distros would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
On Windows I'd use quesoglc-0.7-svn-755, Linux distros would need to depend
on =quesoglc-0.6 !quesoglc-0.7.0.
Any objections? Otherwise I'll do it this weekend.
I hope I am in time !
I have just released QuesoGLC 0.7.1 which
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
before I port it to the 2.1 branch. There is no reason to
Looks like r4024.
Giel van Schijndel schrieb:
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
What revision is this ?
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
I have committed some performance optimizations to trunk that doubled
the fps count on my Intel X3000. I would like to hear reports from
other people if it gives them improved performance, and no new bugs,
and on IRC:
per can those of you who are CPU-limited notice
I'd like to release 2.1_beta2.
On Windows I'd use quesoglc-0.7-svn-755, Linux distros would need to depend
on =quesoglc-0.6 !quesoglc-0.7.0.
Any objections? Otherwise I'll do it this weekend.
Per: Does r3970 / patch #994 revert Reduce the number of atmospheric
particles generated and lower the
The Mac OS X version builds just fine under the 2.1 branch right now.
Starting out the 1-player campaign works fine, too. I'm still not a
fan of the pause-when-losing-focus 'feature' but that's a personal
preference I just can't help from expressing. No objection from the
Mac OS X corner to a
eb 2008 09:33:06 +0100
De: "Per Inge Mathisen"
A: "Development list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sujet: Re: [Warzone-dev] 2.1 beta 2
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Let's make a quiet beta release for this one. That is, just anno
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2008 19:53:00 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AFAIK the font issue Per mentioned originates from QuesoGLC. May be for
the quiet release it would be safer to indicate that version 0.7.0 of
QuesoGLC is buggy on some platforms and that people should stick to 0.6.5.
Let's make a quiet beta release for this one. That is, just announced
on the forums, not on external sites. IMHO, we need to figure out if
the font issue is under control before we attract more disappointed
first time users. But I am all for a quick, new beta release. The
current beta is badly
Dennis Schridde schreef:
So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end of the
week.
Looking at this changelog I'm all for releasing a new 2.1_beta2 (and the
. Unlike last time though, I would like to reach a consensus for the
deadline/release-date on the mailing list and
Hi all,
So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end
of the
week.
So long as GLC works as expected under Windows, I am for it. If not
it might be worth holding off a few more days until we can get
something together.
On the netcode front everything is suspiciously
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Freddie Witherden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
So please vote now, for or against release of 2.1_beta2 by the end
of the
week.
So long as GLC works as expected under Windows, I am for it. If not
it might be worth holding off a few more days
13 matches
Mail list logo
