On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Stephen Swaney wrote:
> Has it been tested by anyone besides yourself?
>
> Not directed at you personally, but the standard excuse for
> commiting broken code is "But I tested it myself!". It ought to be
> the punch line of a joke. Programmers are the worst people
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 01:59:31PM -0500, Zarel wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Christian Ohm wrote:
> > I object. "Let me put untested stuff in and tag immediately afterwards"
> > doesn't
> > exactly sound like good quality-control.
>
> It'd actually be rather well-tested, overall. I
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Christian Ohm wrote:
> I object. "Let me put untested stuff in and tag immediately afterwards"
> doesn't
> exactly sound like good quality-control.
It'd actually be rather well-tested, overall. I mean, I've been
testing it myself, and the code logic is simple eno
On Sunday, 26 July 2009 at 19:53, Christian Ohm wrote:
> I object. "Let me put untested stuff in and tag immediately afterwards"
> doesn't
> exactly sound like good quality-control.
... on the other hand, it sounds like a good plan to do more frequent releases.
Go ahead.
--
This is the first ag
On Sunday, 26 July 2009 at 10:57, Zarel wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Per Inge
> Mathisen wrote:
> > Unless I am hearing any objections, I'll be tagging for release today.
>
> No, no, no, by "relatively soon", I didn't mean _that_ soon! I still
> have some uncommitted patches! Wait up!
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Per Inge
Mathisen wrote:
> Unless I am hearing any objections, I'll be tagging for release today.
No, no, no, by "relatively soon", I didn't mean _that_ soon! I still
have some uncommitted patches! Wait up!
Although, unless I am hearing any objections, I can tag f
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Per Inge
Mathisen wrote:
>> Zarel is pushing for a 2.2.2 relatively soon, what is the status of
>> this?
>
> The sooner the better.
Unless I am hearing any objections, I'll be tagging for release today.
- Per
___
Warz
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM, bugs buggy wrote:
> Just curious as to where we are at?
>
> I know that most of the devs are away/busy, so things have slowed down
> tremendously.
>
> For a alpha 2.3 release, the major blockers/issues with that are power
> code, skybox, and what else?
The remainin
Just curious as to where we are at?
I know that most of the devs are away/busy, so things have slowed down
tremendously.
For a alpha 2.3 release, the major blockers/issues with that are power
code, skybox, and what else?
Zarel is pushing for a 2.2.2 relatively soon, what is the status of
this?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Posted by Dennis Schridde on June 16, 2006 - 11:45:
>I got it also compiling on MSVC 2k5 E!
>(I am using this, works well. Fell in love with MSVS. ;) )
>And it runs well, as long as you dont compile a debugbuild (DEBUG
defined).
>The reason, why it co
Am Donnerstag, 15. Juni 2006 14:12 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen:
> > Actually, seems that the list
> > isn't used for much communication at all. Is there another place
> > the devs talk to each other (IRC?)?
> > The IRC rooms seem dead?
I must admit that communication is almost dead currently.
Al
Hello there,
answers in-lined.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just trying to ping some people, to see who is alive on this list,
and to see if we can post to the list. :)
You can.
Some questions:
The Berlios page is still getting bug reports last we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just trying to ping some people, to see who is alive on this list,
and to see if we can post to the list. :)
Some questions:
The Berlios page is still getting bug reports last we checked. Is
there a reason why that page is still around? Why not clo
13 matches
Mail list logo
