Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Christian Ohm
On Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:52, the_cybersph...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revision: 7968 http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=7968view=rev Author: the_cybersphinx Date: 2009-08-14 11:52:46 + (Fri, 14 Aug 2009) Log Message: --- Fix

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Kreuvf
Dennis Schridde wrote: No clue, but I support that question. To my knowledge you cannot compile the unix crashdump code with bad compilers anyway. Bad compilers? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Warzone-dev mailing list

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Zarel
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Christian Ohmchr@gmx.net wrote: The question is, why do we need to be C90 compliant in unix-only code at all? r7850 removed quite a few consts that might help prevent problems. I'd prefer both this and r7850 to be reverted completely, but at least now it

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Stephen Swaney
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 05:03:18PM +0200, Dennis Schridde wrote: Am Freitag, 14. August 2009 15:02:00 schrieb Christian Ohm: On Friday, 14 August 2009 at 11:52, the_cybersph...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revision: 7968 Was broken in r7850 (#716). I reverted r7850 and then fixed the

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Christian Ohm
On Friday, 14 August 2009 at 15:12, Stephen Swaney wrote: The problem, as stated in #716 was Running default ./configure gives a bunch of mixed declaration code errors in exceptionhandler.c. gcc 4.3.2 openSUSE linux 11.2 Gcc 4.3.2 hardly fits the 'bad compiler' label, IMHO. (feel free

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Christian Ohm
As long as the default settings aren't stupid, I agree. Ehm, as long as the system isn't being stupid. ___ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Christian Ohm
On Friday, 14 August 2009 at 15:46, Stephen Swaney wrote: gcc -std=gnu99 ... -O0 -g -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused-label -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-declarations -Wstrict-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-format-security

Re: [Warzone-dev] [Warzone2100-commits] SF.net SVN: warzone2100:[7968] trunk/lib/exceptionhandler/exceptionhandler. c

2009-08-14 Thread Stephen Swaney
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:05:41PM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote: On Friday, 14 August 2009 at 15:46, Stephen Swaney wrote: gcc -std=gnu99 ... -O0 -g -Wall -Werror -Wno-unused-label -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-declarations