Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>> Also this would make incremental development (i.e. where change B
>> depends on change A) nearly impossible (due to the minimum of 48 hrs
>> wait time before committing if no one commented by then), thus it would
>> actually promote "mega patches" which no one understa
I applied the patch by hand, since we use Trac 0.11.
However, I created a test ticket, but somone needs to approve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as sender.
http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/40
--
Kamaze
Giel van Schijndel schrieb:
> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>
> NOTE: Setting up Trac to send a mail to
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No. But if the tracker doesn't email the list, please do so manually.
>
> NOTE: Setting up Trac to send a mail to the mailinglist for every
> *change* to a ticket (includes ticket creation) is trivial.
That is fine b
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:03 AM, bugs buggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> About these guidelines, take this:
>>
>> " Patches as a rule go into the patch tracker. Give a quick run down of what
>> it does and what it changes."
>>
>> Does it matter which tracker?
>
> No.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:03 AM, bugs buggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> About these guidelines, take this:
>
> " Patches as a rule go into the patch tracker. Give a quick run down of what
> it does and what it changes."
>
> Does it matter which tracker?
No. But if the tracker doesn't email the li
On 8/24/08, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> See http://wiki.wz2100.net/Commit_guidelines
About these guidelines, take this:
" Patches as a rule go into the patch tracker. Give a quick run down of what
it does and what it changes."
Does it matter which tracker? The Trac tracker