Re: Wave with HTTPS?

2012-01-31 Thread Thomas Leonard
Would it be worth applying the patch anyway, with a note in the config that this doesn't work with all clients (and is disabled by default)? That would allow wider testing. On 2012-01-29 23:01, Ali Lown wrote: OpenSSL's s_client is also unable to connect when asked to use the TLS cipher

Re: Widgets

2012-01-31 Thread Ben Hegarty
I decided against a full palette as using it would make it difficult to get the same colour selected twice, I kinda took all of GWaves HTML and CSS and was going to use that as a basis for creating a new widget. Sounds like there isn't much of a preference so I'll just plough on in then :) On

Re: Widgets

2012-01-31 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Ok, good luck! Let me know if you need any GWT help. I think Id make it myself just from a composite of base widgets, either as a disclosure panel with a vertical-panel containing a list of colors, or as a gridpanel of some sort with little colored squares to click on. But, again, no right way

Wave Persistence

2012-01-31 Thread Michael MacFadden
All, I have some free time to work on some patches. I am somewhat interested on working on the server side of things, since I have done work on the client before. I see a few issues with performance and also with persistence. Have we captured the main issues that need to be addressed

Re: Wave Persistence

2012-01-31 Thread Davide Carnovale
Hi Michael, I'd say start with persistence. D Il giorno 31/gen/2012 21:26, Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com ha scritto: All, I have some free time to work on some patches. I am somewhat interested on working on the server side of things, since I have done work on the client

Re: Wave Persistence

2012-01-31 Thread Yuri Z
Maybe you can take a look at issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-305 I made several attempts to fix it, but it's a bit elusive. It somehow related to recent changes, as it didn't happen before with such frequency. The problem is probably in the connection between client and server,

Re: Wave Persistence

2012-01-31 Thread Ali Lown
I hard disabled Websockets on my server looking into this issue, and whilst it hasn't stopped it, it has certainly reduced its frequency. - This fits in with the idea of it being related to a communications issue. When it occurs though, the only solution is a server restart. As for reproducing

Re: Wave Persistence

2012-01-31 Thread Yuri Z
You can reproduce it with the Selenium script. (You would need also this plugin http://51elliot.blogspot.com/2008/02/selenium-ide-goto.html for while loop) Here are my findings regarding this problem: The message No conversations is actually means that no conversational wavelets were received

Re: Questions about implementing 'linky' WAVE-275

2012-01-31 Thread Ali Lown
On 9 December 2011 00:09, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think that Linky should be implemented as robot/robot agent. I guess you can just register listener on update events and then insert the link annotation whenever text in the edited blip looks like a URL. I have now closed the

Java 1.7?

2012-01-31 Thread Ali Lown
Any plans on moving to Java 1.7 support instead? I just tested with openjdk-7-jdk-amd64 (on Debian), and found that the ProtoBuf's failed to compile citing errors such as: compile-proto: [javac] Compiling 11 source files to /wave/build/proto [javac]

Re: Java 1.7?

2012-01-31 Thread Thomas Broyer
Just a note: GWT doesn't support Java 7; but server-side code could use it if needed. Le 31 janv. 2012 22:57, Ali Lown a...@lown.me.uk a écrit : Any plans on moving to Java 1.7 support instead? I just tested with openjdk-7-jdk-amd64 (on Debian), and found that the ProtoBuf's failed to compile

Re: Java 1.7?

2012-01-31 Thread Ali Lown
That would be a problem... A quick google[1] suggests people were asking about it last July, but that it was dependent on Eclipse's JDT having support (which it now has), so it looks like it is just waiting for GWT. Splitting the code between server + client has been needed for a while, but I

Re: Questions about implementing 'linky' WAVE-275

2012-01-31 Thread Thomas Wrobel
I guess because robots then increase bandwidth(as the server needs to send back the update befor you see it change). Probably would look more laggy. Id steer well clear of client side Regexs for something continuously checked like this. Why not just remember the last few letters typed? If its

Re: Questions about implementing 'linky' WAVE-275

2012-01-31 Thread Ali Lown
Id steer well clear of client side Regexs for something continuously checked like this. I did precisely because I knew it would only end badly. Why not just remember the last few letters typed? If only that sort of information was available. The API for this sort of thing is the

Re: Questions about implementing 'linky' WAVE-275

2012-01-31 Thread Daniel Danilatos
An idea to solve the speed problem: There is no API for this currently, but it would be fairly straight forward to listen to the operation stream coming out of the document, which would give you precise, fine-grained knowledge of where changes are occurring and what they are. The only issue here

Re: Review Request: Some user-suggested usability tweaks

2012-01-31 Thread Yuri Zelikov
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3709/#review4739 --- Can we break it into 3 patches and code reviews? - Yuri On