Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

Am I fine to make this a informal vote and decide the outcome as +1. It has been open from the allocated time and no one has -1 it. We also have all +1's from core maintainers. Ive made a record of it here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=69406715 and will update

Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

@Thomas I do not think there is enough to justify it for when we get back around to it since it was written for android 5 and were already up to 7. On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 05:36 Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > +1 > > > El El dom, 16 abr 2017 a las 16:44, Yuri Z

Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

+1 El El dom, 16 abr 2017 a las 16:44, Yuri Z escribió: > +1 > > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote: > > > If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then > > that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so

Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

+1 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote: > If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then > that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is > likely both unfinished and redundant. > That said, there's always a

Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

Dear Apache Wave Community, Last year an attempt at creating an android client was made by a member of the Google Summer of Code. This project was unfinished and has not been maintained by the current developers. To aid in our cleanup I propose that we remove the selection of code for the time

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

to entry for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

branches, and the reduced barrier to entry for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

branches, and the reduced barrier to entry for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

branches, and the reduced barrier to entry for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage

My GSoC Proposal

Hi all, As my proposal [1] for Native Android Client for Apache Wave has being accepted for GSOC 2015. I would like to thank Ali Lown for motoring my project. Project proposal [2]. I am going to start my work according to the Schedule. Cheers, [1] - https://goo.gl/xjhjWc [2] - https://goo.gl

Re: My GSoC Proposal

Congratulations and good luck! ~~~ Thomas Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 2 May 2015 at 03:43, Roshan Lakmal roshan.2013...@iit.ac.lk wrote: Hi all, As my proposal [1] for Native Android Client

Re: My GSoC Proposal

Well done Roshan and best of luck. Sent from my iPhone On 2 May 2015, at 02:43, Roshan Lakmal roshan.2013...@iit.ac.lk wrote: Hi all, As my proposal [1] for Native Android Client for Apache Wave has being accepted for GSOC 2015. I would like to thank Ali Lown for motoring my project

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers. *Confluence:* *The issues

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers. *Confluence:* *The issues

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers. *Confluence:* *The issues:* - contributors must ask

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers. *Confluence:* *The issues:* - contributors must ask

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

with the ability to keep docs synced with the releases via branches, and the reduced barrier to entry for changing them. Would you be interested in leading the migration effort? Ali On 24 April 2015 at 05:59, Evan Hughes ehu...@gmail.com wrote: woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage

Proposal - Documentation storage

This is a proposal for TL;DR

Re: Proposal - Documentation storage

woops, my bad This is a proposal for the storage of documentation to be moved to a git repository instead of on confluence and leave confluence as a place for other technical documents used by developers. *Confluence:* *The issues:* - contributors must ask for permission from

Websocket in a different port and/or subdomain (proposal)

a serious patch. Any experience with something similar? My proposal is to add a new parameter in the configuration if we think that this is reasonable. BR, -- Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado http://comunes.org http://ourproject.org http://homes.ourproject.org/~vjrj/blog (@vjrj) There's no way you're going

Re: A proposal for the websocket issue

Great, it LGTM but i won't be able to try it until next week. Just a couple of remarks (sorry for not using Review Board but i'm using my phone now) : Are the changes to PasswordRobot.java necessary? Perhaps we could use socket.io.js's WS.check() since it also prevents from detecting the Flash

Re: A proposal for the websocket issue

El 20/10/11 01:49, Nelson Silva escribió: Yes i understand but you won't be shipping both jetty 7 and 8 deps. Does socket.io java work with the other transports on jetty 8? I've tested that Socket.io works with jetty 8.0.0.M2, but, 8.0.0.M2 is not compatible with the latest websocket specs.

A proposal for the websocket issue

. Nowadays we have a conditional use_socketio = false/true in the server config, to use raw socket or socket.io. My proposal (I'm not a expert at all on this so please correct me): - To remove this conditional server configuration and use both of them at the same time. I'm not sure if this is possible

Re: A proposal for the websocket issue

. No, I jumped to 8. It might be simpler to make socket.io work. But Socketi-io-java (== socket.io.js 0.6) doesn't work with hybi-10 s, my proposal is to try to use the rest of the transports of socket-io-java... and additionally the browser native websocket support when available. I try

Re: Proposal regarding code reviews and submitting

Great. Well then unless someone objects let's henceforth gently remind people of this practice until it becomes habit :) Dan Στις 29 Απριλίου 2011 7:01 μ.μ., ο χρήστης Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com έγραψε: +1 I ll start doing it from next commit. 2011/4/29 Lennard de Rijk ljvder...@gmail.com Hi

Re: Proposal regarding code reviews and submitting

Hi Michael, I assume by the Jira issue number you mean the Jira issue number, if the patch addresses one We won't have to file a bug for every patch we submit, right? Dan Στις 30 Απριλίου 2011 1:10 π.μ., ο χρήστης Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com έγραψε: On a related note, we

Re: Proposal regarding code reviews and submitting

Dan, Correct! If you are actively working on an issue in the system, then you should put in the issue number, otherwise not. ~Michael On Apr 29, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Daniel Danilatos wrote: Hi Michael, I assume by the Jira issue number you mean the Jira issue number, if the patch addresses

Re: A proposal

Yeah that is a bit of a pain, but I think we can manage if we have everyone who wants to attend register their addresses before hand On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, we should eat our own dog food :). The only problem I foresee is that we can't just

Re: A proposal

+1 On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:07 AM, James Purser jamesrpur...@gmail.comwrote: Yeah that is a bit of a pain, but I think we can manage if we have everyone who wants to attend register their addresses before hand On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, we

Re: A proposal

Okay then now all we need is a time and primary server. On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: I think as long as the wave servers federate - it should not pose a problem. Everybody can choose whatever server they prefer. We need though provide a list of available

Re: A proposal

Great, borrowing from other thread we have 3 demo servers so far: collaborynth.com.au:9898 - federated and persistent waveinabox.net:9898 - federated and persistent demo.wave-in-a-box.org - federated but AFAIK not persistent (?) Also, the main server should be powerful enough to handle the

Re: A proposal

This sounds like a great idea. On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Yuri Z vega...@gmail.com wrote: Great, borrowing from other thread we have 3 demo servers so far: collaborynth.com.au:9898 - federated and persistent waveinabox.net:9898 - federated and persistent demo.wave-in-a-box.org -

A proposal

Hi Guys and Gals, I'm thinking we might try and organise another Apache Wave Office hour, but this time I think we should use apache wave to do it. It would be an excellent way to: a) Test the existing code base with a real world stress test b) Test the federation code as it stands and c) Show

Re: A proposal

That's a good idea. I'm in. On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:16 PM, James Purser jamesrpur...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Guys and Gals, I'm thinking we might try and organise another Apache Wave Office hour, but this time I think we should use apache wave to do it. It would be an excellent way to: a) Test

Re: A proposal

Yeah, we should eat our own dog food :). The only problem I foresee is that we can't just publish reference to the wave but need add participants explicitly (no public waves yet in WIAB). 2011/3/30 Soren Lassen so...@google.com That's a good idea. I'm in. On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:16 PM,

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

.” Yaro zmy...@gmail.com; Rafael Gorski rafa.gor...@gmail.com Sent: Sat, 12 March, 2011 6:30:21 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves Folder trees is definitely a 90'-ish feature we should want to get rid of. Regardless of that: maybe this is feature creep, but why stop on only for all tags

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

...@gmail.com To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org Sent: Sat, 12 March, 2011 19:15:32 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves How is that different from a saved search? On Mar 12, 2011 7:58 AM, Paul Thomas dt01pqt...@yahoo.com wrote: I think there has been a misunderstanding. I was proposing

Proposal for organization of waves

I passed this to another topic, to be a bit more organized. Right now we have three votes for the use of personal tags instead of folders. Personal tags: - Zachary Gamer_Z. Yaro - Peter Escamilla Mahecha - João Neves And also, how should these tags be managed? if they where chosen.

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

How about personal tags that also feeds back into a main search method? That is, you can tag stuff whatever you like and it acts more or less like gmails excellent label system. But on mass the tags associated with a wave could be used to help to categorise waves in searches. [/2 cents] ~~

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Juan Antonio Osorio jaosor...@gmail.com; JoãoNeves seve...@gmail.com; Yuri Zelikov vega...@waveinabox.net Sent: Fri, 11 March, 2011 22:55:24 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves How about personal tags that also feeds back into a main search method

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Juan Antonio Osorio jaosor...@gmail.com; JoãoNeves seve...@gmail.com; Yuri Zelikov vega...@waveinabox.net Sent: Fri, 11 March, 2011 22:55:24 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves How about personal tags that also feeds back into a main search

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

...@gmail.com; JoãoNeves seve...@gmail.com; Yuri Zelikov vega...@waveinabox.net Sent: Fri, 11 March, 2011 22:55:24 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves How about personal tags that also feeds back into a main search method? That is, you can tag stuff whatever you

Re: Proposal for organization of waves

@incubator.apache.org Cc: Juan Antonio Osorio jaosor...@gmail.com; JoãoNeves seve...@gmail.com; Yuri Zelikov vega...@waveinabox.net Sent: Fri, 11 March, 2011 22:55:24 Subject: Re: Proposal for organization of waves How about personal tags that also feeds back into a main search