[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
0-day virus = virus which is propagating before your (or any) antivirus can detect it. It happens every day. Yeah, and given that most new virii are deployed by some bored little computer geek in the ass-end of East Asia the major antivirus companies can usually catch the thing before anything

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread rudy
ross, the way to respond to a troll is not to ;o) by the way, it would be viri, not virii even better is viruses (see fowler) everybody knows what it means, too rudy • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Joseph Harris
- Original Message - From: rudy by the way, it would be viri, not virii even better is viruses (see fowler) everybody knows what it means, too Alas! Alas! Alack-a-day. I see Partridge agrees; but to this pedant it will always be viri. Joseph • The WDVL Discussion

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
rudy by the way, it would be viri, not virii Y'know I've been wondering about that for a while - the double i never looked correct but i was slammed by educators for a very long time for using a single i so I guess it's stuck, but granted viruses is probably better usage even though it is

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread rudy
viruses is probably better usage even though it is technically incorrect ;) no, viruses is technically correct that's what i been tryna tell ya! • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
no, viruses is technically correct that's what i been tryna tell ya! Well maybe I should bloody listen then :P So does this mean that octopi is now octopuses? MOU • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Scott Glasgow
FWIW: http://www.cknow.com/vtutor/vtplural.htm and http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutgrammar/plurals?view=uk Cheers, Scott - Original Message - From: Ross Clutterbuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 1:30 PM Subject: [wdvltalk] Re

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread Cheryl D Wise
Only on the web. ;-D Cheryl D. Wise Certified Professional Web Developer MS-MVP-FrontPage www.wiserways.com mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 713.353.0139 Office -Original Message- From: Ross Clutterbuck no, viruses is technically correct that's what i been tryna tell ya! Well maybe I

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread David Blakey
Well maybe I should bloody listen then :P So does this mean that octopi is now octopuses? I have been trying to stay out of this thread, but I can't let this one go. The plural of octopus in Greek is octopodes, so in English octopuses is a better choice. Octopi? You didn't think octopus was

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-07 Thread rudy
FWIW: http://www.cknow.com/vtutor/vtplural.htm and http://www.askoxford.com/asktheexperts/faq/aboutgrammar/plurals?view=uk FWIW? it's worth a lot thanks, scott those are fine, but don't really hold a candle to Fowler ;o) • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
Netsky is still very much alive on the net. It's annoying yes but as long as you're protected there's nothing to worry about. MOU • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Monday 06 September 2004 18:32, Ross Clutterbuck wrote: Netsky is still very much alive on the net. It's annoying yes but as long as you're protected there's nothing to worry about. Of course there is something to worry about! Day after day new viruses arise. How long until you become

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Cheryl D Wise
One of our Mac only clients had 5 viruses on their G4, so much for non-windows systems being safer. I get sent viruses all the time, have done so since the days of Windows 3.1 and have never been infected by a virus. Same with many people on this list. While less common there are viruses out

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Jon Haworth
Of course there is something to worry about! +-- TROLL-O-METER --+ | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | | ^ | +-+ Only using a non-Windows operating system would do. This

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread mrport
Thanks. On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 17:32:21 +0100 Ross Clutterbuck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Netsky is still very much alive on the net. It's annoying yes but as long as you're protected there's nothing to worry about. MOU Riva Portman, MCIWD Certified Webdesigner Star Quality Designs

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Ross Clutterbuck
Netsky is still very much alive on the net. It's annoying yes but as long as you're protected there's nothing to worry about. Of course there is something to worry about! I'm sorry, does turning on your computer scare you that much *cough troll cough* How long until you become victim of a 0-day

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread mrport
What have I done? grin Riva Riva Portman, MCIWD Certified Webdesigner Star Quality Designs www.starqualitydesigns.com • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To set a

[wdvltalk] Re: Viruses

2004-09-06 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Monday 06 September 2004 21:07, Ross Clutterbuck wrote: How long until you become victim of a 0-day virus? By the very nature of computer virii, there's non such thing as an 0-day virus. Of course there is. 0-day virus = virus which is propagating before your (or any) antivirus can

[wdvltalk] RE: Viruses

2003-10-03 Thread Erich D. Mansell
conspiracy_theoryI think it is because Norton and McAfee house sweatshops of virus creators in the dungeons of corporateville creating these nasty little boogers. It would seem logical to me that a company responsible for creating anti-virus software needs to have viruses to exist and some means

[wdvltalk] RE: Viruses

2003-10-03 Thread Peter MacGregor
Well, I have to say I did wonder! It certainly makes sense - especially when you see stories of hackers being offered humungous salaries to join this that and the other company!! Have a good weekend folks. Peter MacGregor At 16:42 03/10/2003, you wrote: conspiracy_theoryI think it is

[wdvltalk] RE: Viruses

2003-10-03 Thread Bob Laurence
on the web then again this is off topic ;) bob - Original Message - From: Steven Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 8:34 AM Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Viruses Peter MacGregorwrote: How does a virus identifier such as Sophos or Norton or whoever, know

[wdvltalk] RE: Viruses

2003-10-03 Thread michael ensor
- From: Bob Laurence [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 4:35 AM Subject: [wdvltalk] RE: Viruses : very simply, if MS releases a patch then the hackers and script kiddies : decompile and reverse engineer it to see what the patch is patching then : they go from