Hi Adam,
You raise a number of interesting points which I'll try to address.
On Jan 12, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>
>> Do you think thread in the UI process vs. completely separate process is a
>> topic worth discussing
Hi ,
I want to write CSS3 extension, I don’t have any idea about it. I saw
the code related to css in webkit but I am getting difficulties to map
it. I. want to develop own tag like webkit-animation. Please let
me know if anyone having any idea about CSS extension.
Regards,
MK
On Jan 16, 2013, at 2:54 PM, 徐征 wrote:
> So, how can I get assign for this issue(and make the status to ASSIGNED)?
You don’t need to. You can add comments and post a patch without having the bug
formally assigned to you. In fact, we don’t normally pay all that much
attention to the Assigned To
On Jan 16, 2013, at 5:46 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
> I've scoured the web and can't find any reference to anyone using it, mention
> of it's usage on any pages and no other browser supports it.
How much more common is use of the rest of the counters specification? I
understand that counters is
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote:
>
> > WebKit is the only browser that implements the magic counter named
> "list-item" and we have no tests for it.
>
> Seems like we really ought to add some tests for it.
>
> > It's not use
Thank you Adam and Darin
So, how can I get assign for this issue(and make the status to
ASSIGNED)? Should I get connect with reporter?
Now I am reading http://www.webkit.org/quality/lifecycle.html.
Zheng
(2013/01/17 2:25), Darin Adler wrote:
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
Do we know if there is a way to re-write our existing forks w/o
pulling the whole repo down, just to push it back up again? :)
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> If you were using GitHub to contribute to WebKit previously, you might
> want to delete your fork of https://github.
If you were using GitHub to contribute to WebKit previously, you might
want to delete your fork of https://github.com/WebKit/webkit and
re-fork https://github.com/WebKit/webkit. It's also possible to push
a force update to your repository that re-writes the hashes, but I
found that re-forking was
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:19 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> We more or less ignore the "is confirmed" bit in bugs.webkit.org.
I believe it’s possible to rename UNCONFIRMED to NEW and delete NEW so we can
get rid of this distinction that we don’t make use of. Might be worth doing at
some point to reduce c
We more or less ignore the "is confirmed" bit in bugs.webkit.org.
Adam
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:35 AM, 徐征 wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
> This is Zheng and nice to meet you.
>
> I want to confirm some
> issue(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78957) and try to create
> patch for it.
> Howeve
Hello everyone
This is Zheng and nice to meet you.
I want to confirm some
issue(https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78957) and try to create
patch for it.
However, it seems I need "canconfirm-bit" based on
http://www.webkit.org/quality/bugzilla.html
So, could someone give me the right to conf
Hi,
The mirror is finally ready again: https://github.com/WebKit/webkit
It now follows the same hashes of git.webkit.org. People who have
forked this repository on github before will now have to rebase their
branches.
I was hold back a bit because Github wasn't allowing me to push more
than 2GB.
12 matches
Mail list logo
