Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for a new way to handle porting #ifdefs

2009-05-25 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 24, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Adam Barth wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I don't think it should be discounted. It might be helpful to clarify why you think ifdefs are a bad solution. When I made changes that affect several ports, I try to

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for a new way to handle porting #ifdefs

2009-05-25 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 24, 2009, at 10:51 PM, Peter Kasting wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I don't think it should be discounted. It might be helpful to clarify why you think ifdefs are a bad solution. Generally they make it more difficult to read the

Re: [webkit-dev] Does anyone encounter this problem on NY times while using QWebKit?

2009-05-25 Thread Holger Freyther
On Monday 25 May 2009 05:29:37 TianShijun wrote: The website is shown correctly in IE8(with JavaScript error), Safari 4 beta, Firefox 3.0.10 too. I have tried other ports, but encountered many building problems. I think it may be a problem of Qt because the official safari works well. The

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for a new way to handle porting #ifdefs

2009-05-25 Thread Kevin Ollivier
Hi Maciej, On May 25, 2009, at 12:33 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: On May 24, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Adam Barth wrote: On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: I don't think it should be discounted. It might be helpful to clarify why you think ifdefs are a

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for a new way to handle porting #ifdefs

2009-05-25 Thread Peter Kasting
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: Now, the thing I _would_ like to change is to switch from pathless #includes to ones with relative paths -- but that's a totally different thread. That I definitely wouldn't like. It would make it much more painful to

Re: [webkit-dev] Proposal for a new way to handle porting #ifdefs

2009-05-25 Thread Mark Rowe
On 2009-05-25, at 13:19, Peter Kasting wrote: On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: Now, the thing I _would_ like to change is to switch from pathless #includes to ones with relative paths -- but that's a totally different thread. That I definitely

[webkit-dev] WebKit core for Windows CE

2009-05-25 Thread Seweryn Pływaczyk
Hi All. I'm new in WebKit (I've been working with it for week) and it is my first email sent to this list so first of all I'd like to say hello for everybody. My problem is the following: I'd like to build WebKit for Windows CE (ARM) but exactly in the same way like I did it on XP. I mean I'd

Re: [webkit-dev] SharedWorkers alternate design

2009-05-25 Thread John Abd-El-Malek
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote: Following up on this, I had a question about the best way to enable the implementation of SharedWorkerRepository to vary for different platforms.