On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>> For fun, I scrolled back through WebCore/ChangeLog looking for a
>> non-build fix that was missing a bug link. The first one I found was
>> 160 revs ago. I suspect the vast majority of patches already have bug
>> reports.
>
> Did you veri
On May 11, 2010, at 2:30 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
Maybe I would use webkit-patch if it really were quite easy. I
tried it in earnest for a while, but I had to give it up because:
* I couldn't find a ChangeLog workflow that fit its demands, so
using it was actually more complicated than doin
>> Maybe I would use webkit-patch if it really were quite easy. I tried it in
>> earnest for a while, but I had to give it up because:
>> * I couldn't find a ChangeLog workflow that fit its demands, so using it was
>> actually more complicated than doing everything by hand
>
> Can you explain th
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
> > Yes, this way of doing things has more overhead for you personally but
> > saves overhead for everyone else in the project.
>
> I don't think it's fair to frame my perspective as "me personally" and your
> perspective as "everyone else in
>> True, if what you're really asking for is not just a bug report but also a
>> "cooling off period" during which you wait for a result from the EWS bot,
>> even if you get a review right away. You get greater value in the case of a
>> bad patch, but also greater cost in the case of every patch
> For fun, I scrolled back through WebCore/ChangeLog looking for a
> non-build fix that was missing a bug link. The first one I found was
> 160 revs ago. I suspect the vast majority of patches already have bug
> reports.
Did you verify that they all waited for EWS bot results before committing?
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Daniel Cheng wrote:
> From the discussion on https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25882, I
> believe the general consensus is that file:// URLs should not be exposed
> when dragging and dropping.
>
> Removing file:// URL population from event.dataTransfer is pr
On May 11, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
11.05.2010, в 0:56, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
I do think making it capable of handling subdirectories would be an
improvement for SVN users. Also, I suspect it doesn't work as well
as it could for people who prefer to edit Change
HTMLInputElement's 'autofilled' property is cleared when the field
gets focused[1]. This has the visible effect of clearing the pale-
yellow background color to white. Safari only seems to use this
background-color highlighting for autofill of names, emails,
addresses, etc., but Chrome also
-
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> 11.05.2010, в 0:56, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
>
>
> I do think making it capable of handling subdirectories would be an
>> improvement for SVN users. Also, I suspect it doesn't work as well as it
>> could for people who p
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote:
>
> 11.05.2010, в 0:56, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
>
>
> I do think making it capable of handling subdirectories would be an
>> improvement for SVN users. Also, I suspect it doesn't work as well as it
>> could for people who prefer t
11.05.2010, в 0:56, Maciej Stachowiak написал(а):
I do think making it capable of handling subdirectories would be an
improvement for SVN users. Also, I suspect it doesn't work as well
as it could for people who prefer to edit ChangeLogs in a non-
command-line editor, and for people who are
On May 10, 2010, at 11:45 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
As Maciej states, webkit-patch upload is pretty quick (at least for
git users).
I'm not a git user but I still find it more convenient than any other
approach because it has fewer steps and it helps me avoid some common
mistakes.
I do th
13 matches
Mail list logo
