On Thursday 11 October 2007 00:47:56 Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
[...]
> If anyone has comments or objections, let me know. We will likely pull
> the trigger on this tomorrow afternoon (US Pacific time).
Sounds nice :). I think with the Qt port we're likely to track the
safari-3-branch to work on a
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:46 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
Might I suggest Safari-3-branch then? All of our other branches have
a capital Safari.
Capital S sounds good to me.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 4:24 PM, Matt Lilek wrote:
Perhaps "safari-3-branch" could be named "safari-3-apple" and then
have
Might I suggest Safari-3-branch then? All of our other branches have a
capital Safari.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 3:58 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Oct 10, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
Having "branch" in the name is redundant. I propose branches/
safari-3.
On the one hand, you're
On 10/10/07, Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 10, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
>
> Having "branch" in the name is redundant. I propose branches/safari-3.
>
>
>
> On the one hand, you're right that it's redundant. On the other hand,
> -having branch there makes
On Oct 10, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
Having "branch" in the name is redundant. I propose branches/safari-3.
On the one hand, you're right that it's redundant. On the other hand, -
having branch there makes it easier to talk about. We're more likely
to say "let's merge this c
Having "branch" in the name is redundant. I propose branches/safari-3.
On Oct 10, 2007, at 3:47 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Create branches/safari-3-branch/ from trunk/.
— Timothy Hatcher
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
ht
Hi Everyone,
Trunk has been closed to new feature development and risky changes in
general for a long time. Most of the need to do heavy stabilization
has passed. In the meantime, we have had feature-branch, which has
recently been updated and brought much closer to trunk. It's time for
7 matches
Mail list logo
