I circulated a proposal several weeks ago which specified a notifications
API for workers (desktop toasts), and the feedback was that (a) persistent
workers are still far away, (b) is a notifications api necessary given it's
basically a new window?, and (c) have we thought through the security
Hi Eric,
On May 21, 2009, at 9:47 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Interesting analogy. However, closing means to me that the community
is done with the bug. Denying a patch because no one's working on it
anymore (aka, no one is there to respond to review comments even if
you make them) is not the
On Thu, 21 May 2009, John Gregg wrote:
On the security question, a substantial amount of thought has gone into
how to prevent unwanted popups (and in general how to control access to
HTML5 application features). We think user opt-in on an origin-basis is
the best policy and it's what we
On May 22, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Eric Seidel wrote:
Update: We're down to 74 patches now.
Thanks especially to Maciej for all his reviewing this evening:
curl -s https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi; | grep PDT | wc -l]
74
Still a long way to go.
FWIW I prefer this query, which counts by bug
Am 22.05.2009 um 06:41 schrieb Maciej Stachowiak:
On May 21, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
It makes no sense to me to r- a patch because reviewers don't have
time to review it. It put incentive in the wrong place. There are
other solutions to this problem that put incentive in the
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 21:41 -0700, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I discussed the review backlog with Mark Rowe earlier, and we came up
with another idea that may help. This would be to categorize the
review queues. Perhaps we could get bugzilla to show a separate review
queue per component. So for
Reviewed more before bed. We're down to:
https://bugs.webkit.org/buglist.cgi?field0-0-0=flagtypes.nametype0-0-0=equalsvalue0-0-0=review%3F
50
and
curl -s https://bugs.webkit.org/request.cgi; | grep PDT | wc -l
61
respectively.
Still awful, but much much better than yesterday.
-eric
On Fri,
Thanks.
Can you please help me understand why SquirellFish needs to generate
squirellFish byte code first before compile it to machine code?
For v8, it compiles JavaScript source code directly into machine code
when it is first executed. There are no intermediate byte codes, no
interpreter.
Hi,
Does Webkit have profiling build in on MacOS?
e.g. For each page, I would like to know how much time is spent on
html parsing, css parsing, javascript executing?
And does Webkit work with Valgrind on MacOS? Or it uses other time of
profiling tool on MacOS? e.g. for each page, find out the
Sure. We have the following plan for how to handle opt-in:
- Use of the feature by script, if permission isn't granted to the origin,
should throw an exception, not present permissions UI. So your insistent
porn site would have no effect on the user.
- A dialog box asking for permission should
The last step depends on the architecture (supported or not) and C++
compiler directives. If JIT is enabled (see wtf/Platform.h), it always
generates machine code. Otherwise an interpreter executes the byte code. A
mixed environment (both jit and interpreter) is not yet supported.
Are there
Hi,
Historical reasons. SF byte code had been implemented a year ago than jit.
SF byte code (interpreter) will never go away, since not all devices
support jit, and it is easier to generate JIT code from SF byte code than
from Abstract Syntax Tree. Perhaps the authors can tell you more about
this
Hi,
I have modified the WinLauncher application to dump what it has rendered.
Basically I have plugged in the createBitmapContextFromWebView method from
DumpRenderTree Sample, which is supposed to dump a png out of a WebView.
However, I see that the resulting png just has a blank image and not
Some of the rationale is in this blog post too http://webkit.org/blog/214/introducing-squirrelfish-extreme/
.
For example: “We also think we can get a lot more speedups out of the
JIT through techniques such as type specialization, better register
allocation and liveness analysis. [...]
Hi,
I don't think so. It is not worth to do it on a desktop pc since
interpreter is always slower than JIT. However, the story is different for
embedded systems, when they enter low-memory mode. We made some
experiments before, and it seems possible to switch between jit and
interpreter, but I am
No substantive comment, but a small style comment.
On May 21, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
// Static factory method for getting the correct repository
implementation for a given browser
static public SharedWorkerRepository* getRepository();
Generally WebKit does not use the
Thanks - I hadn't realized that about WebKit style.
I've updated the interfaces to use different verbs (like
createWorkerProxy()) or omit the verb entirely where appropriate.
-atw
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
No substantive comment, but a small style
I believe Qt uses instance() in this situation.
Sadly we have not yet found a good verb for the common get or create
idiom.
Cheers.
Kenneth
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
Hello,
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask but I would like to make
Safari developer aware of a problem in most web applications.
The web is intended to be stateless but web application naturally
require stateful behaviour. The option to append the state (for example
a shopping
Following up on this, I had a question about the best way to enable the
implementation of SharedWorkerRepository to vary for different platforms.
I'd like to provide a default WebKit implementation, but on Chromium we'll
want to provide an implementation that proxies shared worker operations to
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
Sadly we have not yet found a good verb for the common get or create
idiom.
My own code uses createObjectIfNeeded() and similar variants.
PK
___
webkit-dev mailing list
I believe HTML 5’s sessionStorage is intended to resolve this issue.
-- Darin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@google.com wrote:
Following up on this, I had a question about the best way to enable the
implementation of SharedWorkerRepository to vary for different platforms.
I'd like to provide a default WebKit implementation, but on Chromium we'll
This is _exactly_ the use case SessionStorage was developed for. :-)
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
I believe HTML 5’s sessionStorage is intended to resolve this issue.
-- Darin
___
webkit-dev mailing
24 matches
Mail list logo
