Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.orgwrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: I would go for something verbose in a easy to understand format. E.g. { test: 'fast/html/keygen.html', platform: 'mac, linux', bug:

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Benjamin Poulain
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: { test: 'fast/html/keygen.html',  platform: 'mac, linux',  bug: 'webkit.org/b/6',  expectedResults: ['crash', 'text', 'image'],  action: 'skip' } As far as I know, a lot of people edit this file on a text editor so

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Benjamin Poulain benja...@webkit.orgwrote: On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: Also, complex syntax tends to be error-prone. One of the pain points of the current syntax is that many people forget to add : and =, or put

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 16, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: There was a semi-logical basis, in that the stuff on the right of the test clearly specified the outcome of the test (PASS, IMAGE, TEXT, etc.). The stuff on the left was less well defined: there's the bug numbers, the

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 16, 2012, at 10:39 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: There was a semi-logical basis, in that the stuff on the right of the test clearly specified the outcome of the test (PASS, IMAGE, TEXT, etc.).

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
I have a proposal that hopefully addresses everyone's concerns, is minimally different from the current format *and* unifies the format with Skipped lists (i.e. Skipped lists as they exist today are valid test_expectations.txt format). The changes from the current format are as follows: -Leaving

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Darin Adler
On May 17, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote: I have a proposal that hopefully addresses everyone's concerns, is minimally different from the current format *and* unifies the format with Skipped lists (i.e. Skipped lists as they exist today are valid test_expectations.txt format). The

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote: I have a proposal that hopefully addresses everyone's concerns, is minimally different from the current format *and* unifies the format with Skipped lists (i.e. Skipped lists as

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Darin Adler
Seriously, syntax is a significant barrier. Having to know which special characters to use. I don’t see this “clear delineation” you speak of. Just special punctuation I have to use to satisfy the computer. -- Darin ___ webkit-dev mailing list

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Could that be because you haven't actually tried using it? :) On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote: Seriously, syntax is a significant barrier. Having to know which special characters to use. I don’t see this “clear delineation” you speak of. Just special

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Sorry, didn't mean to come across as flip. To illustrate, here's an example: WIN SNOWLEOPARD : foo.html = TEXT IMAGE # on all windows platforms and SL, test foo.html is flaky -- fails either with text or pixel results. Easy. TEXT WIN SNOWLEOPARD IMAGE foo.html # fails with text on all windows

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote: I don’t understand why we need the : or + separators. Unfortunately, image+text is different is image text. The former indicates that the test will have mismatches in both .txt and .png files while the latter indicates that

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Kasting
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote: I actually quite like the clear delineation between test modifiers and test expectations. Me too. Please please please leave them on opposite sides. All these proposals that try to put them both before the test

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote: I actually quite like the clear delineation between test modifiers and test expectations. Me too. Please please please leave them on

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.org wrote: I actually quite like the clear delineation between test modifiers and

Re: [webkit-dev] Using namespace std

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On May 15, 2012 10:53 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: Given how little of std:: we actually use (since WTF is used instead for

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 11:28 AM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.comwrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dimitri Glazkov

Re: [webkit-dev] Using namespace std

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Kasting
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: It appears to me using fully qualified names (e.g. std::max(~) at call site) is far superior to using directive for individual symbols (e.g. using std::max). It sounds in general like a number of people have been in favor

Re: [webkit-dev] Using namespace std

2012-05-17 Thread Anders Carlsson
On May 17, 2012, at 12:33 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: It appears to me using fully qualified names (e.g. std::max(~) at call site) is far superior to using directive for individual symbols (e.g. using

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Kasting
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: Perhaps aligning the fields column after the bug URL would improve readability (though it makes things a little harder to edit): We certainly

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
There's lot of good discussion going on in this thread ... I'm going to attempt to reply to various threads in one message, hixie-style :) On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: SKIP and WONTFIX seem parallel to PASS to me. [and] On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:07

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: -Make everything but the test name case-insensitive. I don't think I like this; it could lead to a lot of arbitrarily different formatting in the

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: What does the build configuration info do? Does it apply the line to only those configurations? If that is the case, it does seem potentially different in kind, though maybe also better expressed by being able to combine

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: What does the build configuration info do? Does it apply the line to only those configurations? If that is the case, it does seem potentially

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: -Make everything but the test name case-insensitive. I don't think I like

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Kasting
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: 2. Make outcomes optional. If they are left out, then the test is skipped (unless the test is marked SLOW, in which case it's expected to pass). There is no SKIP modifier. I don't think we should do this. It seems very

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: 2. Make outcomes optional. If they are left out, then the test is skipped (unless the test is marked SLOW, in which case it's expected to pass).

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
Seems reasonable as the first step except: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: 6. Use the same character as a separator before and after the test (:). I counter-propose to drop : or any other delimiter altogether. Delimiters are the biggest pain points in the

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: Seems reasonable as the first step except: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I supposed I misread Peter's earlier email as being opposed to this. But, I for one am opposed to it. I find the jumble of modifiers in the second set of lines here much harder to quickly parse than the groupings in the

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I supposed I misread Peter's earlier email as being opposed to this. But, I for one am opposed to it. I find the jumble of modifiers in the second

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Peter Kasting
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I supposed I misread Peter's earlier email as being opposed to this. You didn't misread me. I have the same opinion as you: this would be a change for the worse. PK ___

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I supposed I misread Peter's earlier email as being opposed to this. But, I for

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: Oh, I supposed I misread Peter's earlier email as being opposed to this. You didn't misread me.  I have the same opinion as you: this would be a

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: I'm just trying to make forward progress on the things we agree on. Anyway, the said changes (replace bogus BUGCR/BUGWK with URLs) and moving SKIP/WONTFIX to after test names sound like a good change anyways. I have no

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: As I said before, I believe they increase the readability of the file. I see them as pure noise. I believe the cost of learning to put delimiters in is near zero, That clearly isn't near zero. Or else people wouldn't

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: As I said before, I believe they increase the readability of the file. I see them as pure noise. Clearly, different people can have different

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: Perhaps we can address these two problems using some tools. e.g. I don't care about the format of test_expectations.txt at all if there was a GUI

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: As I said before, I believe they increase the readability of the file. I

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: I find either all-lowercase or all-caps to be much harder to read than capitalized words. They look like a blob of letters to me. We might have to

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: As I said before, I believe they increase the readability of the file. I

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: I find either all-lowercase or all-caps to be much harder to read than

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 12:53 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: I

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: 2. Make outcomes optional. If they are left out, then the test is skipped (unless

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Ryosuke Niwa rn...@webkit.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:01 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: As I

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: Let's take an example. TEXT next to a test name apparently means that the text fails. There is no way in the world I would guess that just from

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 4:40 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: Let's take an example. TEXT next to a test name apparently means that the

[webkit-dev] EFL 32-bit release buildbot starts running

2012-05-17 Thread Gyuyoung Kim
Hello webkit folks, I'm happy to inform you that the EFL 32-bit release buildbot got online. By the way, this build bot only runs build test for now because of hardware performance. I will change this bot with build and test bot in future.

[webkit-dev] Merging Skipped and test_expectations.txt formats WAS: Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: 2. Make

Re: [webkit-dev] Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ojan Vafai
Closing the loop...bug filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86796 minus item 2 since that turned out to be controversial. On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: We are arguing about too many orthogonal things at once. It seems like there are a few things

Re: [webkit-dev] Merging Skipped and test_expectations.txt formats WAS: Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Ryosuke Niwa
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote: On Thu,

Re: [webkit-dev] Merging Skipped and test_expectations.txt formats WAS: Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Dirk Pranke
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On

Re: [webkit-dev] Merging Skipped and test_expectations.txt formats WAS: Simplifying syntax in test_expectations.txt (bug 86691)

2012-05-17 Thread Maciej Stachowiak
On May 17, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Maciej Stachowiak m...@apple.com wrote: On May 17, 2012, at 1:42 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu,