--- Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Morgan L wrote:
>
> >
> > --- Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Morgan L wrote:
--- Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this.
ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level network
--- Maciej Stachowiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
> >
> >> I think we'll have to rethink this.
> ResourceHandle is intended to
> >> be a low level networking layer, and so it
>
On Jun 12, 2007, at 5:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly we
On Jun 12, 2007, at 2:33 PM, Darin Adler wrote:
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to
be a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to
have higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly we'll need to
make a design change so there's a higher le
I went ahead and filed a bug for this issue:
http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14106
--- Morgan L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the meantime, will you accept a patch to add a
> Frame pointer to loadResourceSynchronously?
>
>
>
> --- Darin Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think
In the meantime, will you accept a patch to add a
Frame pointer to loadResourceSynchronously?
--- Darin Adler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle
> is intended to be
> a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make
> sense to have
> higher l
I think we'll have to rethink this. ResourceHandle is intended to be
a low level networking layer, and so it doesn't make sense to have
higher level concepts like a Frame*, but clearly we'll need to make a
design change so there's a higher level that's easy to plug in to.
Or we can just giv
It is important for the ResourceHandle in the apollo port to have
access to WebView state. We can live with a pointer to the Frame,
FrameLoader, Page, or any other object that allows us to walk back to
our WebView. We could add a factory method on FrameLoaderClient to
construct ResourceHa
9 matches
Mail list logo
