If we want to put the STIX fonts up somewhere to be downloaded, where
would that be if it can't be in subversion?
I think we'd just have a couple of the font files up for download. We
can't really download the from stixfonts.org. Of course, we'd have
to include some program for download as
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
We can't really download them from stixfonts.org.
Why?
-- Darin
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
We can't really download them from stixfonts.org.
Why?
Well, because the zip file is behind a form that requires you to
accept the license. It doesn't seem right to try to
Again, maybe something like http://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/testfonts as
QtWebKit does for the exactly same propose?
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Alex Milowski a...@milowski.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 4:39 AM, Alex
On Jul 20, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
some organization should accept the terms of the license and the
responsibility for distributing this font to test systems (or developers
running tests).
Some organization? You lost me there. Isn’t the STI Pub Companies an
organization?
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
some organization should accept the terms of the license and the
responsibility for distributing this font to test systems (or developers
running tests).
Some
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Antonio Gomes (:tonikitoo)
toniki...@gmail.com wrote:
Again, maybe something like http://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/testfonts as
QtWebKit does for the exactly same propose?
Maybe I missed this somewhere in the discussion. Sure. That looks like
an option.
Are
Le 20 juil. 2010 à 18:30, Antonio Gomes (:tonikitoo) a écrit :
Again, maybe something like http://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/testfonts as
QtWebKit does for the exactly same propose?
But, with that method, fonts should be locally included on all test machines
and as MathML implementation should be
On Jul 20, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Jul 20, 2010, at 8:24 AM, Alex Milowski wrote:
some organization should accept the terms of the license and the
responsibility for distributing this font to test systems
We can't really download them from stixfonts.org.
Alex, wouldn't be possible to contact them and ask some help? Maybe they
could offer us an acceptable solution.
Zoltan
___
webkit-dev mailing list
webkit-dev@lists.webkit.org
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
In my opinion, we, the WebKit project as a whole, are not users. It’s the
people who are making use of WebKit, building it or testing it or possibly
incorporating it into a product, that are the users. I don’t think the
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Zoltan Herczeg
zherc...@inf.u-szeged.hu wrote:
We can't really download them from stixfonts.org.
Alex, wouldn't be possible to contact them and ask some help? Maybe they
could offer us an acceptable solution.
I can try but as a consortium of mostly user
So, it sounds reasonable to use that license for fonts needed in the WebKit
project.
If nobody has objections, an update of the WebKit licensing policy and a review
of the patch [1] including fonts under that license (for MathML) would be great!
François Sausset
[1]
Apple's legal department would strongly prefer for WebKit's license terms to
remain simple. We prefer everything to be licensed under LGPL or BSD terms, or
at the very least a license which is clearly compatible with LGPL and BSD. Is
this license LGPL-compatible for cases where the fonts are
Le 19 juil. 2010 à 21:04, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
Apple's legal department would strongly prefer for WebKit's license terms to
remain simple. We prefer everything to be licensed under LGPL or BSD terms,
or at the very least a license which is clearly compatible with LGPL and BSD.
Is
On Jul 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Sausset François wrote:
Le 19 juil. 2010 à 21:04, Maciej Stachowiak a écrit :
Apple's legal department would strongly prefer for WebKit's license terms to
remain simple. We prefer everything to be licensed under LGPL or BSD terms,
or at the very least a
A little web searching produced:
It's OSI approved:
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/openfont.html
GNU thinks it's OK, albeit having an unusual requirement:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#Fonts
Fedora recommended:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Font_Licenses
It would
17 matches
Mail list logo
