Hi All
I'm sorry, i rarely get personal on these lists but could we please
not vent our frustrations about apple and eof on the wonder people,
because that is exactly the wrong place to siphon off energy. They
need constructive feedback and inspiration. If you doubt this, try
ruby on
Which bits of it would you like them to open up ? and why ?
I would like every bit of it opened up, and the reason is that Apple
moves like a glacier in response to fixing glaring issues that
WebObjects has had in the past. If you adopted Webobjects prior to
5.2, you know what I'm
I don't disagree with anything you are saying - and if it were open
source it would no doubt attract many more people to the platform.
But it's just not going to happen.
Here's a thought: We spent some time several months back looking at
alternative frameworks and one thing we did do was
On 30/06/2007, at 6:50 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
Their refusal to ever consider open sourcing it (in spite of how
Steve Jobs rants about how he looves open source) makes me
feel even more animosity about the platform.
I think I
I am not sure what happening here is fair anyway. You guys at wonder
are doing the job of an open source community, giving Apple the tools
it works with, and what is Apple doing in counterpart? Nothing!
Or very little. WO does not evolve, or so slowly. Apple does not even
maintain the tools.
On Jun 29, 2007, at 1:37 PM, Steven Mark McCraw wrote:
Their refusal to ever consider open sourcing it (in spite of how
Steve Jobs rants about how he looves open source) makes me
feel even more animosity about the platform.
I think I know why they won't do this. No, I won't tell
Their refusal to ever consider open sourcing it (in spite of how
Steve Jobs rants about how he looves open source) makes me
feel even more animosity about the platform.
Which bits of it would you like them to open up ? and why ?
Just about everything i want to tinker with is
