hi all
has anyone built a flash multi file uploader with WO. Does it work or
is the WOMultipartIterator in the way?
regards
Cornelius
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list
There is a 5.4-specific version of Wonder. Did you upgrade to that as
well?
Dave
On Mar 4, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
better subject, same message...
Hello,
Trying to bring up my WO 5.4 app on Leopard, built with Eclipse 3.2
and I'm almost there without having to resort to
No, I wasn't actually. But now, after downloading the latest Wonder
package (Wonder-4) and dragging the frameworks into /Library/
Frameworks, when I try to start eclipse and run my app, it doesn't
start and gets the following error:
[2008-3-5 12:27:19 CST] main java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
No, I wasn't actually. But now, after downloading the latest Wonder
package (Wonder-4) and dragging the frameworks into /Library/
Frameworks, when I try to start eclipse and run my app, it doesn't
start and gets the following error:
When you say the latest wonder package, what do you mean --
Is this the whole ERExtensions needs to load before the WO
Frameworks thing?
On Mar 5, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
No, I wasn't actually. But now, after downloading the latest
Wonder package (Wonder-4) and dragging the frameworks into /Library/
Frameworks, when I try to start
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=45176
I downloaded Wonder-4.0.zip
On Mar 5, 2008, at 6:41 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
No, I wasn't actually. But now, after downloading the latest
Wonder package (Wonder-4) and dragging the frameworks into /Library/
Frameworks, when I try
Now I see there's another site altogether with a wonder 5.4.
http://webobjects.mdimension.com/wonder/
I'll try that.
On Mar 5, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=45176
I downloaded Wonder-4.0.zip
On Mar 5, 2008, at 6:41 AM, Mike
Is there any way to get rid of old WO sites? We now seem to have a
problem that there are several websites that are obsolete or were
false-starts on community building.
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:34 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
Yeah, the sourceforge site is basically useless now ... Wonder-4.0 !
=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All
I have a component actton method that is calling a second component
(not nested) and the result is the action method being called twice
in the first component and also appendToResponse twice
Well, the homepage of wonder.sourceforge.net redirects to the Wonder
blog ... I don't know if we can get rid of the sourceforge files
repository, but maybe Anjo could upload a file that named
THIS_REPOSITORY_IS_OLD (or whatever) to sourceforge. Technically
4.0 is the last official
Yeah, the sourceforge site is basically useless now ... Wonder-4.0 !=
Wonder for 5.4. You want http://webobjects.mdimension.com/wonder .
ms
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=45176
I downloaded Wonder-4.0.zip
On Mar 5,
On 5 Mar 2008, at 13:59, Gino Pacitti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All
I have a component actton method that is calling a second component
(not nested) and the result is the action method being called twice
in the first component and also appendToResponse twice
Hello,
My company, Move, currently operates realtor.com and move.com. We
have been a .NET shop in the past, but that will no longer be the case.
We are building a new technology team in Campbell, California to
eventually replace all of our existing websites. This is one of those
rare
I recently implemented it, and am willing to open it up. I'll pint
Mike Schrag to see if it can/should go in Wonder.
(I believe you were in our test group for Ad Grinder, yes?)
On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all
has anyone built a flash multi file uploader with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Patrick
The content of AttractionVoucher is just the basic header content for
an empty component... No body content...
If I call super before the pdf download code then I get the double
action but if I place the super after then I get a single
Hi James,
Just looking at your list, you're getting what I would expect, i.e.
it's 4 days from Monday to Friday. But I think if you want the
calculation to be inclusive, it looks like you would always be safe in
adding one day to the end date before performing the calculation.
Regards,
Oh boy, I really started something ! :) I was hoping to get an answer
like set this variable ..., instead I got a very interesting dissertation.
Anyway, solving my problem is not that important, since it's such a rare
occurrence, but all the answers made me learn a lot and pointed me to
other
I would be very interested in taking a look at your component. Does it
handle large files? Does it stream them? Allow restart if the upload failed?
Any support for SSL?
Thanks in advance for any info or code that you can provide.
Dov Rosenberg
On 3/5/08 10:21 AM, Joshua Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joshua
On 05.03.2008, at 16:21, Joshua Paul wrote:
I recently implemented it, and am willing to open it up. I'll pint
Mike Schrag to see if it can/should go in Wonder.
that would be great.
i found this project: http://swfupload.org and the implementation is
pretty straight forward for
Le 08-03-05 à 11:32, Cornelius Jaeger a écrit :
Hi Joshua
On 05.03.2008, at 16:21, Joshua Paul wrote:
I recently implemented it, and am willing to open it up. I'll pint
Mike Schrag to see if it can/should go in Wonder.
that would be great.
i found this project: http://swfupload.org and
Implementing a one sided one-to-many is straightforward (to prevent
pulling in a million rows just to add a few entities to the both sides
of relationship), but is there some special consideration when
implementing a one-sided many-to-many since the join table has rows
added and deleted
Do these components synchronize their bindings? If you have a
hyperlink with
action = downloadPDF;
The downloadPDF() will get called multiple times by binding
synchronization.
Chuck
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:59 AM, Gino Pacitti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All
I
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
Oh boy, I really started something ! :) I was hoping to get an
answer like set this variable ..., instead I got a very
interesting dissertation.
Anyway, solving my problem is not that important, since it's such a
rare occurrence, but all
Hi Kieran,
Am 05.03.2008 um 18:07 schrieb Kieran Kelleher:
Implementing a one sided one-to-many is straightforward (to
prevent pulling in a million rows just to add a few entities to the
both sides of relationship), but is there some special consideration
when implementing a one-sided
Implementing a one sided one-to-many is straightforward (to
prevent pulling in a million rows just to add a few entities to the
both sides of relationship), but is there some special consideration
when implementing a one-sided many-to-many since the join table
has rows added and deleted
Le 08-03-05 à 12:35, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Valerio Luccio wrote:
Oh boy, I really started something ! :) I was hoping to get an
answer like set this variable ..., instead I got a very
interesting dissertation.
Anyway, solving my problem is not that important,
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:44 AM, Miguel Arroz wrote:
Hi!
Yes, I'm living almost on the California time zone, despite the
fact that I live in a GMT country... :) Anyway, I go to sleep late
but I also wake up late. I really wish I could handle sleeping less
time per day like the Wonder boys,
Hi!
Yes, I'm living almost on the California time zone, despite the
fact that I live in a GMT country... :) Anyway, I go to sleep late but
I also wake up late. I really wish I could handle sleeping less time
per day like the Wonder boys, but unfortunately, I can't... :(
Oh, and about
This is my first attempt at consuming complex types. I've done simple
types in the past successfully, but I'm stuck when trying to
deserialize the result of a Telesign call. This is a commercial
service that rings a given phone number and speaks some code so the
called person can enter the
It works
Now, can I assume that under 5.4 things are a little more strict
regarding the html/wod stuff? It's yelling at me for a twice defined
wod variable, even though it's not used in my html. Does this mean I
have to go through all my html/wod stuff and fix all those red X's?
Yahoo currently is adding a YUI component for multi-file uploading as
well :
http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/uploader/
On Mar 5, 2008, at 4:59 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 08-03-05 à 11:32, Cornelius Jaeger a écrit :
Hi Joshua
On 05.03.2008, at 16:21, Joshua Paul wrote:
I recently
The problem with Tapestry is that it changes so drastically from
version to version, which is what caused us to look at JSF for a
project that absolutely could not be WO.
Oracle ADF is actively developed, and from experiences of colleagues,
is a nightmare, and these are not WO people saying
A project inside Apple that cannot use WO ? That's a really bad sign...
The problem with Tapestry is that it changes so drastically from
version to version, which is what caused us to look at JSF for a
project that absolutely could not be WO.
Oracle ADF is actively developed, and from
WOW, Useful html/wod error messages. Outline view. Insert Webobject
buttons. SWEET!!!
I'm going to like life in the 5.4 fast lane I think.
Jeff
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:48 PM, Jeff Schmitz wrote:
It works
Now, can I assume that under 5.4 things are a little more strict
regarding the
3 words :
pointy haired boss
On Mar 6, 2008, at 2:14 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
A project inside Apple that cannot use WO ? That's a really bad
sign...
The problem with Tapestry is that it changes so drastically from
version to version, which is what caused us to look at JSF for a
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:34 PM, David den Boer wrote:
The problem with Tapestry is that it changes so drastically from
version to version, which is what caused us to look at JSF for a
project that absolutely could not be WO.
Oracle ADF is actively developed, and from experiences of
Is JSF still alive ? Two years ago, we started a project using it.
People said it was the ultimate Java solution, better than strunt.
Using it with hibernate, looked great, seemed to be as easy as
WebObjects... if you don't know WebObjects and you want a 100 % SUN
Java Solution.
But, as
37 matches
Mail list logo
